成人癌症恶病质的多组分干预:系统综述

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Megan Bowers, Carmine Petrasso, Amy McLuskie, Joanne Bayly, Barry J. A. Laird, Irene J. Higginson, Matthew Maddocks
{"title":"成人癌症恶病质的多组分干预:系统综述","authors":"Megan Bowers,&nbsp;Carmine Petrasso,&nbsp;Amy McLuskie,&nbsp;Joanne Bayly,&nbsp;Barry J. A. Laird,&nbsp;Irene J. Higginson,&nbsp;Matthew Maddocks","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer cachexia has substantial impacts on people's quality of life. There is no current gold standard treatment, but the complex pathophysiology of cachexia suggests that a multitargeted and individualised treatment approach is needed. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which multicomponent interventions have targeted the key features of cachexia and been tailored to individuals, and differential effects on quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic review of multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. We searched four databases, two clinical trial registers and MedRxiv on 20 June 2024. Intervention components were classified by intervention category (nutritional, exercise/physical activity, pharmacological and psychosocial), cachexia feature(s) targeted (reduced energy intake, altered metabolism, involuntary weight loss and decline in physical function) and level of tailoring. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life over time, as well as standardised mean differences between study arms, were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two multicomponent interventions were included, of which two combined components from all four intervention categories, and nine targeted all four key features of cachexia. Eighteen multicomponent interventions were fully tailored and 30 were partly tailored to individuals. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life were calculated for thirteen studies; all had a high risk of bias or raised concerns. In eleven studies, quality of life scores improved following the intervention, whereas in two studies they declined. Standardised mean differences between study arms were calculated for four studies; in three, the intervention arm showed a greater improvement in quality of life scores than the usual care arm. Amongst these data, there was no indication that the number of cachexia features targeted, or the extent of tailoring, was associated with a greater improvement in quality of life scores; however, the heterogeneity prevented us from concluding on our hypothesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review mapped out in detail the combinations of intervention categories used, the key features of cachexia targeted, and the extent of tailoring across multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. Only a small proportion of the multicomponent interventions targeted all four key features of cachexia, but most were either partly or fully tailored to individuals. Despite sixty-two multicomponent interventions being investigated, only four studies compared these to usual care and reported quality of life outcomes. High risk of bias, low sample sizes and variable outcome data remain challenges to the interpretability of results in this field.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicomponent Interventions for Adults With Cancer Cachexia: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Megan Bowers,&nbsp;Carmine Petrasso,&nbsp;Amy McLuskie,&nbsp;Joanne Bayly,&nbsp;Barry J. A. Laird,&nbsp;Irene J. Higginson,&nbsp;Matthew Maddocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcsm.13716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer cachexia has substantial impacts on people's quality of life. There is no current gold standard treatment, but the complex pathophysiology of cachexia suggests that a multitargeted and individualised treatment approach is needed. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which multicomponent interventions have targeted the key features of cachexia and been tailored to individuals, and differential effects on quality of life.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a systematic review of multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. We searched four databases, two clinical trial registers and MedRxiv on 20 June 2024. Intervention components were classified by intervention category (nutritional, exercise/physical activity, pharmacological and psychosocial), cachexia feature(s) targeted (reduced energy intake, altered metabolism, involuntary weight loss and decline in physical function) and level of tailoring. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life over time, as well as standardised mean differences between study arms, were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-two multicomponent interventions were included, of which two combined components from all four intervention categories, and nine targeted all four key features of cachexia. Eighteen multicomponent interventions were fully tailored and 30 were partly tailored to individuals. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life were calculated for thirteen studies; all had a high risk of bias or raised concerns. In eleven studies, quality of life scores improved following the intervention, whereas in two studies they declined. Standardised mean differences between study arms were calculated for four studies; in three, the intervention arm showed a greater improvement in quality of life scores than the usual care arm. Amongst these data, there was no indication that the number of cachexia features targeted, or the extent of tailoring, was associated with a greater improvement in quality of life scores; however, the heterogeneity prevented us from concluding on our hypothesis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review mapped out in detail the combinations of intervention categories used, the key features of cachexia targeted, and the extent of tailoring across multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. Only a small proportion of the multicomponent interventions targeted all four key features of cachexia, but most were either partly or fully tailored to individuals. Despite sixty-two multicomponent interventions being investigated, only four studies compared these to usual care and reported quality of life outcomes. High risk of bias, low sample sizes and variable outcome data remain challenges to the interpretability of results in this field.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13716\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13716\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13716","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症恶病质对人们的生活质量有重大影响。目前还没有黄金标准的治疗方法,但恶病质的复杂病理生理表明,需要一种多目标和个性化的治疗方法。我们旨在评估针对恶病质关键特征的多组分干预措施在多大程度上适合个体,以及对生活质量的不同影响。方法我们对成人癌症恶病质的多组分干预进行了系统回顾。我们于2024年6月20日检索了4个数据库、2个临床试验注册库和MedRxiv。干预成分按干预类别(营养、运动/身体活动、药理学和社会心理)、针对恶病质特征(能量摄入减少、代谢改变、非自愿体重减轻和身体功能下降)和定制水平进行分类。计算各组间生活质量随时间的标准化平均变化,以及各组间的标准化平均差异。结果共纳入62项多组分干预措施,其中2项组合干预来自所有4种干预类别,9项针对恶病质的所有4个关键特征。18项多组分干预措施是完全量身定制的,30项是部分针对个人定制的。计算了13项研究的组内标准化平均生活质量变化;所有这些都有很高的偏见风险或引起关注。在11项研究中,生活质量得分在干预后有所提高,而在两项研究中则有所下降。计算了4个研究组间的标准化平均差异;在第三组中,干预组在生活质量得分上比常规护理组有更大的改善。在这些数据中,没有迹象表明针对恶病质特征的数量或剪裁程度与生活质量评分的更大改善有关;然而,异质性使我们无法对我们的假设做出结论。本综述详细列出了所使用的干预类别组合,针对恶病质的关键特征,以及针对成人癌症恶病质的多组分干预的定制程度。只有一小部分多组分干预针对恶病质的所有四个关键特征,但大多数都是部分或完全针对个人量身定制的。尽管调查了62项多组分干预措施,但只有4项研究将其与常规护理和报告的生活质量结果进行了比较。高偏倚风险、低样本量和可变结果数据仍然是该领域结果可解释性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multicomponent Interventions for Adults With Cancer Cachexia: A Systematic Review

Multicomponent Interventions for Adults With Cancer Cachexia: A Systematic Review

Background

Cancer cachexia has substantial impacts on people's quality of life. There is no current gold standard treatment, but the complex pathophysiology of cachexia suggests that a multitargeted and individualised treatment approach is needed. We aimed to evaluate the extent to which multicomponent interventions have targeted the key features of cachexia and been tailored to individuals, and differential effects on quality of life.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. We searched four databases, two clinical trial registers and MedRxiv on 20 June 2024. Intervention components were classified by intervention category (nutritional, exercise/physical activity, pharmacological and psychosocial), cachexia feature(s) targeted (reduced energy intake, altered metabolism, involuntary weight loss and decline in physical function) and level of tailoring. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life over time, as well as standardised mean differences between study arms, were calculated.

Results

Sixty-two multicomponent interventions were included, of which two combined components from all four intervention categories, and nine targeted all four key features of cachexia. Eighteen multicomponent interventions were fully tailored and 30 were partly tailored to individuals. Within-arm standardised mean changes in quality of life were calculated for thirteen studies; all had a high risk of bias or raised concerns. In eleven studies, quality of life scores improved following the intervention, whereas in two studies they declined. Standardised mean differences between study arms were calculated for four studies; in three, the intervention arm showed a greater improvement in quality of life scores than the usual care arm. Amongst these data, there was no indication that the number of cachexia features targeted, or the extent of tailoring, was associated with a greater improvement in quality of life scores; however, the heterogeneity prevented us from concluding on our hypothesis.

Conclusions

This review mapped out in detail the combinations of intervention categories used, the key features of cachexia targeted, and the extent of tailoring across multicomponent interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. Only a small proportion of the multicomponent interventions targeted all four key features of cachexia, but most were either partly or fully tailored to individuals. Despite sixty-two multicomponent interventions being investigated, only four studies compared these to usual care and reported quality of life outcomes. High risk of bias, low sample sizes and variable outcome data remain challenges to the interpretability of results in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信