Mehrad Aria, Zohreh Javanmard, Donia Pishdad, Vahid Jannesari, Maryam Keshvari, Mahshid Arastonejad, Reza Safdari, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari
{"title":"白血病检测和分类的智能诊断系统:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Mehrad Aria, Zohreh Javanmard, Donia Pishdad, Vahid Jannesari, Maryam Keshvari, Mahshid Arastonejad, Reza Safdari, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Leukemia is a type of blood cancer that begins in the bone marrow and results in high numbers of abnormal white blood cells. Automated detection and classification of leukemia and its subtypes using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms plays a significant role in the early diagnosis and treatment of this fatal disease. This study aimed to review and synthesize research findings on AI-based approaches in leukemia detection and classification from peripheral blood smear images.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted across four e-databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) from January 2015 to March 2023 by searching the keywords “Leukemia,” “Machine Learning,” and “Blood Smear Image,” as well as their synonyms. All original journal articles and conference papers that used ML algorithms in detecting and classifying leukemia were included. The study quality was assessed using the Qiao Quality Assessment tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 1325 articles identified through a systematic search, 190 studies were eligible for this review. The mean validation accuracy (ACC) of the ML methods applied in the reviewed studies was 95.38%. Among different ML methods, modern techniques were mostly considered to detect and classify leukemia (60.53% of studies). Supervised learning was the dominant ML paradigm (79% of studies). Studies utilized common ML methodologies for leukemia detection and classification, including preprocessing, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. Deep learning (DL) techniques, especially convolutional neural networks, were the most widely used modern algorithms in the mentioned methodologies. Most studies relied on internal validation (87%). Moreover, K-fold cross-validation and train/test split were the commonly employed validation strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AI-based algorithms are widely used in detecting and classifying leukemia with remarkable performance. Future studies should prioritize rigorous external validation to evaluate generalizability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Diagnostic Intelligent Systems in Leukemia Detection and Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mehrad Aria, Zohreh Javanmard, Donia Pishdad, Vahid Jannesari, Maryam Keshvari, Mahshid Arastonejad, Reza Safdari, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jebm.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Leukemia is a type of blood cancer that begins in the bone marrow and results in high numbers of abnormal white blood cells. Automated detection and classification of leukemia and its subtypes using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms plays a significant role in the early diagnosis and treatment of this fatal disease. This study aimed to review and synthesize research findings on AI-based approaches in leukemia detection and classification from peripheral blood smear images.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted across four e-databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) from January 2015 to March 2023 by searching the keywords “Leukemia,” “Machine Learning,” and “Blood Smear Image,” as well as their synonyms. All original journal articles and conference papers that used ML algorithms in detecting and classifying leukemia were included. The study quality was assessed using the Qiao Quality Assessment tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From 1325 articles identified through a systematic search, 190 studies were eligible for this review. The mean validation accuracy (ACC) of the ML methods applied in the reviewed studies was 95.38%. Among different ML methods, modern techniques were mostly considered to detect and classify leukemia (60.53% of studies). Supervised learning was the dominant ML paradigm (79% of studies). Studies utilized common ML methodologies for leukemia detection and classification, including preprocessing, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. Deep learning (DL) techniques, especially convolutional neural networks, were the most widely used modern algorithms in the mentioned methodologies. Most studies relied on internal validation (87%). Moreover, K-fold cross-validation and train/test split were the commonly employed validation strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>AI-based algorithms are widely used in detecting and classifying leukemia with remarkable performance. Future studies should prioritize rigorous external validation to evaluate generalizability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的白血病是一种起源于骨髓并导致大量异常白细胞的血癌。利用人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)算法对白血病及其亚型进行自动检测和分类,在这种致命疾病的早期诊断和治疗中发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在综述和综合基于人工智能的外周血涂片图像白血病检测和分类方法的研究成果。方法系统检索2015年1月至2023年3月4个电子数据库(Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus和IEEE Xplore)的相关文献,检索关键词为“Leukemia”、“Machine Learning”和“Blood Smear Image”及其同义词。所有使用ML算法检测和分类白血病的原始期刊文章和会议论文均被纳入。采用乔氏质量评价工具对研究质量进行评价。结果通过系统检索,从1325篇文章中筛选出190篇研究纳入本综述。所回顾的研究中应用的ML方法的平均验证准确率(ACC)为95.38%。在不同的ML方法中,现代技术主要用于白血病的检测和分类(60.53%的研究)。监督学习是主要的机器学习范式(79%的研究)。研究利用常见的ML方法进行白血病检测和分类,包括预处理、特征提取、特征选择和分类。深度学习(DL)技术,特别是卷积神经网络,是上述方法中使用最广泛的现代算法。大多数研究依赖于内部验证(87%)。此外,K-fold交叉验证和训练/测试分割是常用的验证策略。结论基于人工智能的算法在白血病的检测和分类中应用广泛,具有显著的效果。未来的研究应优先考虑严格的外部验证来评估通用性。
Towards Diagnostic Intelligent Systems in Leukemia Detection and Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objective
Leukemia is a type of blood cancer that begins in the bone marrow and results in high numbers of abnormal white blood cells. Automated detection and classification of leukemia and its subtypes using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms plays a significant role in the early diagnosis and treatment of this fatal disease. This study aimed to review and synthesize research findings on AI-based approaches in leukemia detection and classification from peripheral blood smear images.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted across four e-databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) from January 2015 to March 2023 by searching the keywords “Leukemia,” “Machine Learning,” and “Blood Smear Image,” as well as their synonyms. All original journal articles and conference papers that used ML algorithms in detecting and classifying leukemia were included. The study quality was assessed using the Qiao Quality Assessment tool.
Results
From 1325 articles identified through a systematic search, 190 studies were eligible for this review. The mean validation accuracy (ACC) of the ML methods applied in the reviewed studies was 95.38%. Among different ML methods, modern techniques were mostly considered to detect and classify leukemia (60.53% of studies). Supervised learning was the dominant ML paradigm (79% of studies). Studies utilized common ML methodologies for leukemia detection and classification, including preprocessing, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. Deep learning (DL) techniques, especially convolutional neural networks, were the most widely used modern algorithms in the mentioned methodologies. Most studies relied on internal validation (87%). Moreover, K-fold cross-validation and train/test split were the commonly employed validation strategies.
Conclusion
AI-based algorithms are widely used in detecting and classifying leukemia with remarkable performance. Future studies should prioritize rigorous external validation to evaluate generalizability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.