燃料与火花点火发动机计算协同优化

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Philipp Ackermann, Benjamin Auer, Patrick Burkardt, Bastian Lehrheuer, Philipp Morsch, Karl Alexander Heufer, Stefan Pischinger, Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*, 
{"title":"燃料与火花点火发动机计算协同优化","authors":"Philipp Ackermann,&nbsp;Benjamin Auer,&nbsp;Patrick Burkardt,&nbsp;Bastian Lehrheuer,&nbsp;Philipp Morsch,&nbsp;Karl Alexander Heufer,&nbsp;Stefan Pischinger,&nbsp;Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0477510.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 8","pages":"4079–4093 4079–4093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Co-optimization of Fuel and Spark-Ignition Engine\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Ackermann,&nbsp;Benjamin Auer,&nbsp;Patrick Burkardt,&nbsp;Bastian Lehrheuer,&nbsp;Philipp Morsch,&nbsp;Karl Alexander Heufer,&nbsp;Stefan Pischinger,&nbsp;Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0477510.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"4079–4093 4079–4093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对燃油和发动机的协同优化,可以提高火花点火发动机的效率。首先,计算燃料设计可以利用预测燃料特性模型(如高辛烷值)来优化燃料分子或成分。然后,通过实验对发动机结构进行优化,使可达到的效率最大化。然而,这种基于燃料性能的顺序协同优化可能会产生次优燃料,因为燃料性能不能完全捕获复杂的燃料-发动机相互作用。因此,我们提出了燃料和发动机的计算同步协同优化。为此,我们推导了一个发动机热力学模型,该模型预测了发动机性能作为燃料组成和发动机配置的函数。我们根据单缸研究发动机的实验数据校准发动机模型,这样新的候选燃料就不需要用额外的实验发动机数据重新校准模型。作为案例研究,我们选择了在之前的研究中确定的10种可能的替代燃料成分,并创建了39种二元和60种三元燃料混合物。然后,考虑爆震和峰值压力约束,对每种混合燃料的组成以及发动机的压缩比和进气压力进行共同优化,以确保发动机平稳安全运行。研究表明,小酯乙酸甲酯和乙酸乙酯是未来火花点火发动机的有希望的候选燃料。对于富含乙酸甲酯的混合物,发动机模型预测在高达20的压缩比和高达1.8 bar的增压压力下无碰撞运行,使乙酸甲酯成为甲醇的有希望的替代品。然而,考虑到显著的模型不确定性,研究结果需要实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational Co-optimization of Fuel and Spark-Ignition Engine

Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信