Philipp Ackermann, Benjamin Auer, Patrick Burkardt, Bastian Lehrheuer, Philipp Morsch, Karl Alexander Heufer, Stefan Pischinger, Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*,
{"title":"燃料与火花点火发动机计算协同优化","authors":"Philipp Ackermann, Benjamin Auer, Patrick Burkardt, Bastian Lehrheuer, Philipp Morsch, Karl Alexander Heufer, Stefan Pischinger, Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0477510.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 8","pages":"4079–4093 4079–4093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Co-optimization of Fuel and Spark-Ignition Engine\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Ackermann, Benjamin Auer, Patrick Burkardt, Bastian Lehrheuer, Philipp Morsch, Karl Alexander Heufer, Stefan Pischinger, Alexander Mitsos and Manuel Dahmen*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0477510.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"4079–4093 4079–4093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computational Co-optimization of Fuel and Spark-Ignition Engine
Spark-ignition engine efficiency can be increased by co-optimizing fuel and engine. First, computational fuel design can optimize fuel molecules or composition using predictive fuel property models, e.g., for high octane numbers. Then, the engine configuration can be optimized experimentally to maximize the achievable efficiency. However, such a sequential co-optimization based on fuel properties may yield suboptimal fuels, as the fuel properties do not fully capture the complex fuel–engine interaction. Therefore, we propose the computational, simultaneous co-optimization of fuel and engine. To this end, we derive a thermodynamic engine model that predicts the engine performance as a function of fuel composition and engine configuration. We calibrate the engine model against experimental data from a single-cylinder research engine, such that new candidate fuels require no model recalibration with additional experimental engine data. As a case study, we select 10 possible alternative fuel components identified in previous studies and create 39 binary and 60 ternary fuel mixtures. The composition of each fuel mixture is then co-optimized together with the compression ratio and the intake pressure of the engine considering knock and peak pressure constraints to ensure smooth and safe engine operation. The study reveals the small esters methyl acetate and ethyl acetate as promising fuel candidates for future spark-ignition engines. For methyl-acetate-rich blends, the engine model predicts knock-free operation at compression ratios of up to 20 and boost pressures of up to 1.8 bar, rendering methyl acetate a promising alternative to methanol. Considering significant model uncertainties, however, the findings require experimental validation.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.