肋间锯肌平面阻滞与后腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜肾切除术中的应用:一项随机、对照、双盲研究。

M T Fernandez Martin, M G Matesanz, J Andres, H Muñoz, M F Muñoz, A Fadrique, P Castillo, P Casas, S Lopez
{"title":"肋间锯肌平面阻滞与后腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜肾切除术中的应用:一项随机、对照、双盲研究。","authors":"M T Fernandez Martin, M G Matesanz, J Andres, H Muñoz, M F Muñoz, A Fadrique, P Castillo, P Casas, S Lopez","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even though laparoscopic nephrectomy improves the quality of postoperative recovery, it still causes moderate to severe pain. Our objective was to determine whether serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) was noninferior to posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in terms of pain control and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, controlled, randomized, blinded study had a sample size of 120 patients who were randomly assigned to SIPB, QLB, and control groups prior to scheduled laparoscopic nephrectomy. We collected the following variables: postoperative dynamic pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h, postoperative quality of recovery (QoR15), and total opioid consumption (fentanyl and morphine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that SIPB was non-inferior to QLB with regard to the primary endpoint (NRS 0.4/0.9) and quality of recovery (QoR15 112.7/106.85) (p 0.27). Opioid consumption (fentanyl p 0.37 and morphine p 0.9) was similar in the SIPB and QLB groups, and both groups were superior to controls in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p 0.001) and pain control (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIPB and QLB showed adequate postoperative pain control, good quality of recovery and lower fentanyl consumption, especially compared to the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"501728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercostal serratus plane block versus posterior quadratuus lumbar block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: A randomized, controlled, double-blind study.\",\"authors\":\"M T Fernandez Martin, M G Matesanz, J Andres, H Muñoz, M F Muñoz, A Fadrique, P Castillo, P Casas, S Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even though laparoscopic nephrectomy improves the quality of postoperative recovery, it still causes moderate to severe pain. Our objective was to determine whether serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) was noninferior to posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in terms of pain control and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, controlled, randomized, blinded study had a sample size of 120 patients who were randomly assigned to SIPB, QLB, and control groups prior to scheduled laparoscopic nephrectomy. We collected the following variables: postoperative dynamic pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h, postoperative quality of recovery (QoR15), and total opioid consumption (fentanyl and morphine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that SIPB was non-inferior to QLB with regard to the primary endpoint (NRS 0.4/0.9) and quality of recovery (QoR15 112.7/106.85) (p 0.27). Opioid consumption (fentanyl p 0.37 and morphine p 0.9) was similar in the SIPB and QLB groups, and both groups were superior to controls in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p 0.001) and pain control (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIPB and QLB showed adequate postoperative pain control, good quality of recovery and lower fentanyl consumption, especially compared to the control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"501728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管腹腔镜肾切除术提高了术后恢复质量,但仍会引起中度至重度疼痛。我们的目的是确定在疼痛控制和恢复质量方面,锯肌肋间平面阻滞(SIPB)是否优于腰后方肌阻滞(QLB)。方法:这项多中心、对照、随机、盲法研究的样本量为120例患者,他们在预定的腹腔镜肾切除术前被随机分配到SIPB组、QLB组和对照组。我们收集了以下变量:术后0、6、12和24小时的动态疼痛评分,术后恢复质量(QoR15)和阿片类药物总用量(芬太尼和吗啡)。结果:我们的研究结果显示,在主要终点(NRS 0.4/0.9)和恢复质量(QoR15 112.7/106.85)方面,SIPB不逊于QLB (p 0.27)。SIPB组和QLB组的阿片类药物用量(芬太尼p 0.37,吗啡p 0.9)相似,两组在术中芬太尼用量(p 0.001)和疼痛控制(p)方面均优于对照组。结论:SIPB组和QLB组术后疼痛控制良好,恢复质量好,芬太尼用量较低,特别是与对照组相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intercostal serratus plane block versus posterior quadratuus lumbar block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: A randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

Background: Even though laparoscopic nephrectomy improves the quality of postoperative recovery, it still causes moderate to severe pain. Our objective was to determine whether serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) was noninferior to posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in terms of pain control and quality of recovery.

Methods: This multicentre, controlled, randomized, blinded study had a sample size of 120 patients who were randomly assigned to SIPB, QLB, and control groups prior to scheduled laparoscopic nephrectomy. We collected the following variables: postoperative dynamic pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h, postoperative quality of recovery (QoR15), and total opioid consumption (fentanyl and morphine).

Results: Our results show that SIPB was non-inferior to QLB with regard to the primary endpoint (NRS 0.4/0.9) and quality of recovery (QoR15 112.7/106.85) (p 0.27). Opioid consumption (fentanyl p 0.37 and morphine p 0.9) was similar in the SIPB and QLB groups, and both groups were superior to controls in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (p 0.001) and pain control (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: SIPB and QLB showed adequate postoperative pain control, good quality of recovery and lower fentanyl consumption, especially compared to the control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信