对后天性脑损伤和智力残疾患者的治疗关系和洞察力之间关系的评估。

IF 2.7
Andrea Sica, Corinne McCabe, Kevin Tierney
{"title":"对后天性脑损伤和智力残疾患者的治疗关系和洞察力之间关系的评估。","authors":"Andrea Sica, Corinne McCabe, Kevin Tierney","doi":"10.1007/s44192-025-00150-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between therapeutic relationships (TR) and Insight into overall deficit and skill among clinical populations is supported by a very limited number of studies. Even fewer of these have explored the association in brain injury or disability populations, and none have explored the association outside of therapeutic settings with qualified professionals such as psychologists. In fact, the impact of TR on Insight when interventions are delivered by frontline, non-clinically trained staff is virtually unexplored. This explorative, correlational study of 24 adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) (N = 11) and intellectual disability (ID; N = 13) and their 24 keyworkers aimed to address this gap. The Scale To Assess Therapeutic Relationships (STAR) provided the measure of TR while the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS) provided the measure of Insight. Participants were recruited from a residential community service. Spearman's rho correlations between the STAR and PCRS and each of their subscales revealed no significant correlations in the overall sample. However, several post-hoc correlations reached statistical significance within the ABI group. These findings support the hypothesis of an interplay between TR and Insight following ABI. Reasons why this interplay was not found in the overall sample or the ID group are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"5 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the association between therapeutic relationships and insight among those with acquired brain injury and intellectual disability.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Sica, Corinne McCabe, Kevin Tierney\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44192-025-00150-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The association between therapeutic relationships (TR) and Insight into overall deficit and skill among clinical populations is supported by a very limited number of studies. Even fewer of these have explored the association in brain injury or disability populations, and none have explored the association outside of therapeutic settings with qualified professionals such as psychologists. In fact, the impact of TR on Insight when interventions are delivered by frontline, non-clinically trained staff is virtually unexplored. This explorative, correlational study of 24 adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) (N = 11) and intellectual disability (ID; N = 13) and their 24 keyworkers aimed to address this gap. The Scale To Assess Therapeutic Relationships (STAR) provided the measure of TR while the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS) provided the measure of Insight. Participants were recruited from a residential community service. Spearman's rho correlations between the STAR and PCRS and each of their subscales revealed no significant correlations in the overall sample. However, several post-hoc correlations reached statistical significance within the ABI group. These findings support the hypothesis of an interplay between TR and Insight following ABI. Reasons why this interplay was not found in the overall sample or the ID group are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discover mental health\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861831/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discover mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-025-00150-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-025-00150-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床人群中,治疗关系(TR)与洞察总体缺陷和技能之间的关联得到了数量非常有限的研究的支持。在这些研究中,对脑损伤或残障人群的关联进行研究的就更少了,而且没有人在心理学家等合格专业人士的治疗环境之外研究过这种关联。事实上,当干预措施由一线、非临床培训的工作人员提供时,TR对Insight的影响几乎没有被探索过。本文对24例成人获得性脑损伤(ABI) (N = 11)与智力残疾(ID;N = 13)和他们的24名关键员工旨在解决这一差距。治疗关系评估量表(STAR)提供了TR的测量,而患者能力评定量表(PCRS)提供了洞察力的测量。参与者是从一个住宿社区服务机构招募的。Spearman在STAR和PCRS及其每个子量表之间的rho相关性显示,在整个样本中没有显著的相关性。然而,在ABI组中,一些事后相关性达到了统计学意义。这些发现支持了TR与ABI后洞察力之间相互作用的假设。讨论了在整个样本或ID组中没有发现这种相互作用的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of the association between therapeutic relationships and insight among those with acquired brain injury and intellectual disability.

The association between therapeutic relationships (TR) and Insight into overall deficit and skill among clinical populations is supported by a very limited number of studies. Even fewer of these have explored the association in brain injury or disability populations, and none have explored the association outside of therapeutic settings with qualified professionals such as psychologists. In fact, the impact of TR on Insight when interventions are delivered by frontline, non-clinically trained staff is virtually unexplored. This explorative, correlational study of 24 adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) (N = 11) and intellectual disability (ID; N = 13) and their 24 keyworkers aimed to address this gap. The Scale To Assess Therapeutic Relationships (STAR) provided the measure of TR while the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS) provided the measure of Insight. Participants were recruited from a residential community service. Spearman's rho correlations between the STAR and PCRS and each of their subscales revealed no significant correlations in the overall sample. However, several post-hoc correlations reached statistical significance within the ABI group. These findings support the hypothesis of an interplay between TR and Insight following ABI. Reasons why this interplay was not found in the overall sample or the ID group are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信