重度抑郁症患者及其家属治疗后电休克治疗决策过程的探讨。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106
Jordy Rovers, Lieke Schönberger, Dore Loef, Philip van Eijndhoven, Esmée Verwijk, Metten Somers, Annemiek Dols, Indira Tendolkar
{"title":"重度抑郁症患者及其家属治疗后电休克治疗决策过程的探讨。","authors":"Jordy Rovers, Lieke Schönberger, Dore Loef, Philip van Eijndhoven, Esmée Verwijk, Metten Somers, Annemiek Dols, Indira Tendolkar","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Shared decision making is used for reaching medical decisions, also in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe MDD. However, the decision-making process, specifically the exchange of evidence-based information, for ECT may be hampered by the controversy and stigma surrounding ECT. We aim to explore the experiences of the decision-making process of patients and their relatives who have chosen to receive ECT in order to guide optimization of shared decision making in ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with MDD patients and their relatives who had voluntarily received ECT between 2018-2023 at the Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meaning saturation occurred after 16 interviews. The following 3 major themes emerged: 1) information is key, 2) empowering the decision, and 3) lived experiences with ECT. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible information presented in a calm and stepwise manner. They also identified gaps in desired information, particularly regarding memory loss and difficulty in retaining the given information. Factors empowering the decision included support from family, healthcare professionals, peers, and desperation, while negative factors included stigma, negative images, lack of support, and fear. Lived experiences with ECT might influence a future decision. Positive experiences were improved attitudes, treatment effects, and empathic and involved professionals, while negative aspects included cognitive side effects and lack of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insights into factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with MDD that received ECT. It shows possibilities for improving the decision-making process in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Decision-Making Process for Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Relatives After Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Jordy Rovers, Lieke Schönberger, Dore Loef, Philip van Eijndhoven, Esmée Verwijk, Metten Somers, Annemiek Dols, Indira Tendolkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Shared decision making is used for reaching medical decisions, also in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe MDD. However, the decision-making process, specifically the exchange of evidence-based information, for ECT may be hampered by the controversy and stigma surrounding ECT. We aim to explore the experiences of the decision-making process of patients and their relatives who have chosen to receive ECT in order to guide optimization of shared decision making in ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with MDD patients and their relatives who had voluntarily received ECT between 2018-2023 at the Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meaning saturation occurred after 16 interviews. The following 3 major themes emerged: 1) information is key, 2) empowering the decision, and 3) lived experiences with ECT. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible information presented in a calm and stepwise manner. They also identified gaps in desired information, particularly regarding memory loss and difficulty in retaining the given information. Factors empowering the decision included support from family, healthcare professionals, peers, and desperation, while negative factors included stigma, negative images, lack of support, and fear. Lived experiences with ECT might influence a future decision. Positive experiences were improved attitudes, treatment effects, and empathic and involved professionals, while negative aspects included cognitive side effects and lack of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insights into factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with MDD that received ECT. It shows possibilities for improving the decision-making process in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:共同决策用于达成医疗决策,也用于重度抑郁症(MDD)的管理。电痉挛疗法(ECT)是重度重度抑郁症患者的有效治疗选择。然而,ECT的决策过程,特别是基于证据的信息交流,可能会受到围绕ECT的争议和污名的阻碍。我们旨在探讨选择电痉挛治疗的患者及其家属的决策过程,以指导电痉挛治疗中共同决策的优化。方法:对2018-2023年间在荷兰内梅德大学医学中心自愿接受电痉挛治疗的重度抑郁症患者及其亲属进行半结构化访谈。访谈采用主题分析法进行分析。结果:16次访谈后出现意义饱和。以下三个主要主题出现了:1)信息是关键,2)授权决策,3)ECT的生活体验。与会者强调以冷静和循序渐进的方式提供可获取的信息的重要性。他们还发现了所需信息的空白,特别是在记忆丧失和难以保留给定信息方面。促成这一决定的因素包括来自家庭、医疗保健专业人员、同伴和绝望的支持,而负面因素包括耻辱、负面形象、缺乏支持和恐惧。ECT的生活经历可能会影响未来的决定。积极体验包括态度的改善、治疗效果、移情和专业人员的参与,而消极体验包括认知副作用和缺乏随访。结论:本研究揭示了影响重度抑郁症患者接受电痉挛治疗决策过程的因素。它显示了在临床实践中改善决策过程的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Decision-Making Process for Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Relatives After Treatment.

Objectives: Shared decision making is used for reaching medical decisions, also in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe MDD. However, the decision-making process, specifically the exchange of evidence-based information, for ECT may be hampered by the controversy and stigma surrounding ECT. We aim to explore the experiences of the decision-making process of patients and their relatives who have chosen to receive ECT in order to guide optimization of shared decision making in ECT.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with MDD patients and their relatives who had voluntarily received ECT between 2018-2023 at the Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis.

Results: Meaning saturation occurred after 16 interviews. The following 3 major themes emerged: 1) information is key, 2) empowering the decision, and 3) lived experiences with ECT. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible information presented in a calm and stepwise manner. They also identified gaps in desired information, particularly regarding memory loss and difficulty in retaining the given information. Factors empowering the decision included support from family, healthcare professionals, peers, and desperation, while negative factors included stigma, negative images, lack of support, and fear. Lived experiences with ECT might influence a future decision. Positive experiences were improved attitudes, treatment effects, and empathic and involved professionals, while negative aspects included cognitive side effects and lack of follow-up.

Conclusions: This study offers insights into factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with MDD that received ECT. It shows possibilities for improving the decision-making process in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信