{"title":"The Effects of a Short-Term Supplemental Breathwork Protocol on the Aerobic Performance of Recreational Runners.","authors":"Adrian T Wolff, Sara R Sherman, Craig A Horswill","doi":"10.3390/sports13020031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the effects of a functional breathing program on the aerobic performance of recreational runners. Runners participated in an aerobic endurance training program with functional breathing (FBP; <i>n</i> = 8, 34.8 ± 5.1 yrs, 25.3 ± 2.5 kg·m<sup>2</sup>) or without functional breathing (CON; <i>n</i> = 8, 29 ± 5 yrs, 23 ± 2 kg·m<sup>2</sup>). The treatment group underwent daily breathing exercises, and nasal-only breathing during low-intensity sessions of the training program. The primary outcome variables measured before and after the program included the following: the breath-hold time at rest, the duration and VO<sub>2max</sub> with nasal-only breathing, and the VO<sub>2max</sub> with normal breathing during a graded running test. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (<i>p</i> < 0.05). We found a significant group x time interaction for breath-hold time (∆ from PRE: +1.9 s [CON], +11.7 s [FBP]; <i>p</i> = 0.04; d = 1.13). However, the changes in the time and VO<sub>2max</sub> with nasal-only breathing, and in the VO<sub>2max</sub> with normal breathing, did not differ between the FBP and CON groups. A small but significant time (main) effect for the increase in VO<sub>2max</sub> (~3.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.05) suggested that both groups had adequate stimuli for physiological adaptations. The four-week supplementary functional breathing protocol increased the breath-hold time, but not the maximum nasal-only breathing time, nasal-only breathing VO<sub>2max</sub>, or VO<sub>2max</sub>, in recreational runners.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13020031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of a Short-Term Supplemental Breathwork Protocol on the Aerobic Performance of Recreational Runners.
We investigated the effects of a functional breathing program on the aerobic performance of recreational runners. Runners participated in an aerobic endurance training program with functional breathing (FBP; n = 8, 34.8 ± 5.1 yrs, 25.3 ± 2.5 kg·m2) or without functional breathing (CON; n = 8, 29 ± 5 yrs, 23 ± 2 kg·m2). The treatment group underwent daily breathing exercises, and nasal-only breathing during low-intensity sessions of the training program. The primary outcome variables measured before and after the program included the following: the breath-hold time at rest, the duration and VO2max with nasal-only breathing, and the VO2max with normal breathing during a graded running test. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). We found a significant group x time interaction for breath-hold time (∆ from PRE: +1.9 s [CON], +11.7 s [FBP]; p = 0.04; d = 1.13). However, the changes in the time and VO2max with nasal-only breathing, and in the VO2max with normal breathing, did not differ between the FBP and CON groups. A small but significant time (main) effect for the increase in VO2max (~3.0%, p < 0.05) suggested that both groups had adequate stimuli for physiological adaptations. The four-week supplementary functional breathing protocol increased the breath-hold time, but not the maximum nasal-only breathing time, nasal-only breathing VO2max, or VO2max, in recreational runners.