IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.3390/sports13020031
Adrian T Wolff, Sara R Sherman, Craig A Horswill
{"title":"The Effects of a Short-Term Supplemental Breathwork Protocol on the Aerobic Performance of Recreational Runners.","authors":"Adrian T Wolff, Sara R Sherman, Craig A Horswill","doi":"10.3390/sports13020031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the effects of a functional breathing program on the aerobic performance of recreational runners. Runners participated in an aerobic endurance training program with functional breathing (FBP; <i>n</i> = 8, 34.8 ± 5.1 yrs, 25.3 ± 2.5 kg·m<sup>2</sup>) or without functional breathing (CON; <i>n</i> = 8, 29 ± 5 yrs, 23 ± 2 kg·m<sup>2</sup>). The treatment group underwent daily breathing exercises, and nasal-only breathing during low-intensity sessions of the training program. The primary outcome variables measured before and after the program included the following: the breath-hold time at rest, the duration and VO<sub>2max</sub> with nasal-only breathing, and the VO<sub>2max</sub> with normal breathing during a graded running test. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (<i>p</i> < 0.05). We found a significant group x time interaction for breath-hold time (∆ from PRE: +1.9 s [CON], +11.7 s [FBP]; <i>p</i> = 0.04; d = 1.13). However, the changes in the time and VO<sub>2max</sub> with nasal-only breathing, and in the VO<sub>2max</sub> with normal breathing, did not differ between the FBP and CON groups. A small but significant time (main) effect for the increase in VO<sub>2max</sub> (~3.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.05) suggested that both groups had adequate stimuli for physiological adaptations. The four-week supplementary functional breathing protocol increased the breath-hold time, but not the maximum nasal-only breathing time, nasal-only breathing VO<sub>2max</sub>, or VO<sub>2max</sub>, in recreational runners.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13020031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了功能性呼吸训练对休闲跑步者有氧运动表现的影响。跑步者参加了一项有氧耐力训练计划,其中包括功能性呼吸(FBP;n = 8,34.8 ± 5.1 岁,25.3 ± 2.5 kg-m2)或无功能性呼吸(CON;n = 8,29 ± 5 岁,23 ± 2 kg-m2)。治疗组每天进行呼吸练习,并在训练计划的低强度课程中进行纯鼻呼吸。训练前后测量的主要结果变量包括:休息时的憋气时间、纯鼻呼吸的持续时间和 VO2max,以及分级跑步测试中正常呼吸的 VO2max。数据采用双向方差分析(P < 0.05)。我们发现憋气时间存在明显的组间 x 时间交互作用(与 PRE 相比的 ∆:+1.9 秒 [CON], +11.7 秒 [FBP];p = 0.04;d = 1.13)。然而,纯鼻呼吸的时间和 VO2max 的变化以及正常呼吸的 VO2max 的变化在 FBP 组和 CON 组之间没有差异。VO2max 增加的时间(主)效应很小,但很明显(约 3.0%,P < 0.05),这表明两组都有足够的生理适应刺激。为期四周的辅助功能性呼吸方案增加了休闲跑步者的憋气时间,但没有增加最大纯鼻呼吸时间、纯鼻呼吸 VO2max 或 VO2max。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of a Short-Term Supplemental Breathwork Protocol on the Aerobic Performance of Recreational Runners.

We investigated the effects of a functional breathing program on the aerobic performance of recreational runners. Runners participated in an aerobic endurance training program with functional breathing (FBP; n = 8, 34.8 ± 5.1 yrs, 25.3 ± 2.5 kg·m2) or without functional breathing (CON; n = 8, 29 ± 5 yrs, 23 ± 2 kg·m2). The treatment group underwent daily breathing exercises, and nasal-only breathing during low-intensity sessions of the training program. The primary outcome variables measured before and after the program included the following: the breath-hold time at rest, the duration and VO2max with nasal-only breathing, and the VO2max with normal breathing during a graded running test. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). We found a significant group x time interaction for breath-hold time (∆ from PRE: +1.9 s [CON], +11.7 s [FBP]; p = 0.04; d = 1.13). However, the changes in the time and VO2max with nasal-only breathing, and in the VO2max with normal breathing, did not differ between the FBP and CON groups. A small but significant time (main) effect for the increase in VO2max (~3.0%, p < 0.05) suggested that both groups had adequate stimuli for physiological adaptations. The four-week supplementary functional breathing protocol increased the breath-hold time, but not the maximum nasal-only breathing time, nasal-only breathing VO2max, or VO2max, in recreational runners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信