谁是你的队友?痴呆症护理网络分类及其与痴呆症护理者和接受护理者福祉的关联。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Amanda N Leggett, Srabani Haldar, Sophia Tsuker, Wenhua Lai, Natasha Nemmers, HwaJung Choi, Vicki Freedman
{"title":"谁是你的队友?痴呆症护理网络分类及其与痴呆症护理者和接受护理者福祉的关联。","authors":"Amanda N Leggett, Srabani Haldar, Sophia Tsuker, Wenhua Lai, Natasha Nemmers, HwaJung Choi, Vicki Freedman","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While caregivers are typically enmeshed in broad networks of family and friends assisting with care, this network has been neglected in favor of examining a \"primary\" caregiver. This study examines types of family and unpaid friend networks for individuals with dementia and how one's network type relates to the well-being of care recipients with dementia and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are drawn from the nationally representative 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and associated National Study of Caregiving. The sample includes 336 dementia care networks (network size mean = 2.9). We first identified network types using latent class analysis and then examined the extent to which network type is associated with the well-being of care recipients with dementia (sleep, depressive symptoms) and their caregivers (emotional difficulty, overload, social support from family and friends) using ANOVA and linear regressions adjusting for demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3 network types were identified: \"Siloed\"-small networks, limited task sharing (29.8% of networks); \"Small but Mighty\"-small networks, high task sharing (23.0% of networks); and \"Complex\"-large networks, diverse membership, members who share and specialize in task assistance (47.2%). Individuals with dementia with a \"Siloed\" network had significantly poorer sleep quality and caregivers in \"Siloed\" networks reported receiving less social support from family and friends than those in \"Small but Mighty\" and \"Complex\" networks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Caregiver networks that are less collaborative may need supports to reduce isolation among caregivers and improve health outcomes for individuals with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who's On Your Team? Classifying Dementia Caregiving Networks and Associations With the Well-being of Caregivers and Care Recipients With Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda N Leggett, Srabani Haldar, Sophia Tsuker, Wenhua Lai, Natasha Nemmers, HwaJung Choi, Vicki Freedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geronb/gbaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While caregivers are typically enmeshed in broad networks of family and friends assisting with care, this network has been neglected in favor of examining a \\\"primary\\\" caregiver. This study examines types of family and unpaid friend networks for individuals with dementia and how one's network type relates to the well-being of care recipients with dementia and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are drawn from the nationally representative 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and associated National Study of Caregiving. The sample includes 336 dementia care networks (network size mean = 2.9). We first identified network types using latent class analysis and then examined the extent to which network type is associated with the well-being of care recipients with dementia (sleep, depressive symptoms) and their caregivers (emotional difficulty, overload, social support from family and friends) using ANOVA and linear regressions adjusting for demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3 network types were identified: \\\"Siloed\\\"-small networks, limited task sharing (29.8% of networks); \\\"Small but Mighty\\\"-small networks, high task sharing (23.0% of networks); and \\\"Complex\\\"-large networks, diverse membership, members who share and specialize in task assistance (47.2%). Individuals with dementia with a \\\"Siloed\\\" network had significantly poorer sleep quality and caregivers in \\\"Siloed\\\" networks reported receiving less social support from family and friends than those in \\\"Small but Mighty\\\" and \\\"Complex\\\" networks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Caregiver networks that are less collaborative may need supports to reduce isolation among caregivers and improve health outcomes for individuals with dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然照顾者通常被卷入广泛的家庭和朋友网络中,以协助照顾,但这个网络一直被忽视,有利于检查“主要”照顾者。本研究考察了痴呆症患者的家庭和无偿朋友网络类型,以及一个人的网络类型如何与痴呆症患者及其照顾者的福祉相关。方法:数据来自具有全国代表性的2017年全国健康与老龄化趋势研究和相关的全国护理研究。样本包括336个痴呆症护理网络(网络大小平均=2.9)。我们首先使用潜在类别分析确定网络类型,然后使用方差分析和人口统计学调整的线性回归检查网络类型与痴呆症护理对象(睡眠,抑郁症状)及其护理者(情绪困难,过载,家庭和朋友的社会支持)的幸福感相关的程度。结果:确定了三种网络类型:“孤立的”——小型网络,任务共享有限(占网络的29.8%);“小而强大”——网络小,任务共享高(占网络的23.0%);“复杂”——庞大的网络,多样化的成员,共享和专门从事任务协助的成员(47.2%)。“孤立”网络中的痴呆症患者睡眠质量明显较差,“孤立”网络中的护理人员报告说,与“小而强大”和“复杂”网络中的护理人员相比,“孤立”网络中的护理人员从家人和朋友那里获得的社会支持更少。讨论:协作性较差的照顾者网络可能需要支持,以减少照顾者之间的隔离,改善痴呆症患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who's On Your Team? Classifying Dementia Caregiving Networks and Associations With the Well-being of Caregivers and Care Recipients With Dementia.

Objectives: While caregivers are typically enmeshed in broad networks of family and friends assisting with care, this network has been neglected in favor of examining a "primary" caregiver. This study examines types of family and unpaid friend networks for individuals with dementia and how one's network type relates to the well-being of care recipients with dementia and their caregivers.

Methods: Data are drawn from the nationally representative 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and associated National Study of Caregiving. The sample includes 336 dementia care networks (network size mean = 2.9). We first identified network types using latent class analysis and then examined the extent to which network type is associated with the well-being of care recipients with dementia (sleep, depressive symptoms) and their caregivers (emotional difficulty, overload, social support from family and friends) using ANOVA and linear regressions adjusting for demographics.

Results: 3 network types were identified: "Siloed"-small networks, limited task sharing (29.8% of networks); "Small but Mighty"-small networks, high task sharing (23.0% of networks); and "Complex"-large networks, diverse membership, members who share and specialize in task assistance (47.2%). Individuals with dementia with a "Siloed" network had significantly poorer sleep quality and caregivers in "Siloed" networks reported receiving less social support from family and friends than those in "Small but Mighty" and "Complex" networks.

Discussion: Caregiver networks that are less collaborative may need supports to reduce isolation among caregivers and improve health outcomes for individuals with dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信