人工智能满足整体审查:自动化医学教育招生过程的承诺和陷阱。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964
Jacob T Rosenthal, Frederic W Hafferty, Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram, Claire L Wendland, Janelle S Taylor
{"title":"人工智能满足整体审查:自动化医学教育招生过程的承诺和陷阱。","authors":"Jacob T Rosenthal, Frederic W Hafferty, Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram, Claire L Wendland, Janelle S Taylor","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Holistic review has been widely adopted in medical education as a means of promoting equity in the application process and diversity in the medical workforce. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly emerging technology already having an impact on the medical school and residency application process as students and faculty alike increasingly turn to AI tools to automate some steps in the preparation and evaluation of application materials. While AI may have the potential to improve the holistic admissions process by increasing efficiency and adding some measure of standardization among reviewers, the authors caution that this promise does not come without certain pitfalls. AI models may introduce new sources of bias and amplify existing ones, which, when combined with a lack of transparency regarding their use in the admissions process, may perpetuate the very inequities that holistic review seeks to minimize. The authors call for the medical education community to establish clear regulations to govern the acceptable use of AI in the admissions process and for a principled adoption of AI tools in a way that is sustainable for applicants and reviewers in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"541-546"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Meets Holistic Review: Promises and Pitfalls of Automating the Medical Education Admissions Process.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob T Rosenthal, Frederic W Hafferty, Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram, Claire L Wendland, Janelle S Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Holistic review has been widely adopted in medical education as a means of promoting equity in the application process and diversity in the medical workforce. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly emerging technology already having an impact on the medical school and residency application process as students and faculty alike increasingly turn to AI tools to automate some steps in the preparation and evaluation of application materials. While AI may have the potential to improve the holistic admissions process by increasing efficiency and adding some measure of standardization among reviewers, the authors caution that this promise does not come without certain pitfalls. AI models may introduce new sources of bias and amplify existing ones, which, when combined with a lack of transparency regarding their use in the admissions process, may perpetuate the very inequities that holistic review seeks to minimize. The authors call for the medical education community to establish clear regulations to govern the acceptable use of AI in the admissions process and for a principled adoption of AI tools in a way that is sustainable for applicants and reviewers in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"541-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:医学教育已广泛采用整体审查作为促进申请过程公平和医务人员多样性的一种手段。人工智能(AI)是一项迅速崛起的技术,已经对医学院和住院医师培训申请过程产生了影响,因为学生和教师都越来越多地使用人工智能工具来自动完成准备和评估申请材料的某些步骤。虽然人工智能有可能通过提高效率和增加评审人员之间的标准化程度来改善整体招生流程,但作者提醒说,这种前景并非没有隐患。人工智能模型可能会引入新的偏见来源,并放大现有的偏见,再加上在招生过程中使用这些模型缺乏透明度,可能会使整体评审试图最小化的不公平现象长期存在下去。作者呼吁医学教育界制定明确的规章制度,对招生过程中可接受的人工智能使用进行规范,并有原则地采用人工智能工具,使申请者和评审者在未来能够持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Meets Holistic Review: Promises and Pitfalls of Automating the Medical Education Admissions Process.

Abstract: Holistic review has been widely adopted in medical education as a means of promoting equity in the application process and diversity in the medical workforce. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly emerging technology already having an impact on the medical school and residency application process as students and faculty alike increasingly turn to AI tools to automate some steps in the preparation and evaluation of application materials. While AI may have the potential to improve the holistic admissions process by increasing efficiency and adding some measure of standardization among reviewers, the authors caution that this promise does not come without certain pitfalls. AI models may introduce new sources of bias and amplify existing ones, which, when combined with a lack of transparency regarding their use in the admissions process, may perpetuate the very inequities that holistic review seeks to minimize. The authors call for the medical education community to establish clear regulations to govern the acceptable use of AI in the admissions process and for a principled adoption of AI tools in a way that is sustainable for applicants and reviewers in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信