{"title":"The clinical challenge of managing patients after sustained virological response with direct-acting antivirals for Hepatitis C.","authors":"Anna Pocurull, Sabela Lens","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review highlights the critical considerations for monitoring patients who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite the remarkable success of DAAs, challenges persist in managing long-term risks, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver decompensation, and extrahepatic manifestations, necessitating a tailored follow-up approach.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies emphasize that SVR does not eliminate risks for complications, particularly in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Advances in noninvasive tools, such as transient elastography and blood-based markers, have improved assessment of portal hypertension and liver function dynamics post-SVR. HCC surveillance remains critical for high-risk groups. Additionally, SVR improves extrahepatic conditions like mixed cryoglobulinemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, though careful monitoring for recurrence or associated risks is advised. Reinfection in high-risk populations underscores the importance of structured prevention and retreatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Tailored follow-up of post-SVR patients remains essential. Future research should focus on refining predictive tools for late complications and optimizing surveillance strategies, balancing cost-effectiveness with clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The clinical challenge of managing patients after sustained virological response with direct-acting antivirals for Hepatitis C.
Purpose of review: This review highlights the critical considerations for monitoring patients who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite the remarkable success of DAAs, challenges persist in managing long-term risks, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver decompensation, and extrahepatic manifestations, necessitating a tailored follow-up approach.
Recent findings: Recent studies emphasize that SVR does not eliminate risks for complications, particularly in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Advances in noninvasive tools, such as transient elastography and blood-based markers, have improved assessment of portal hypertension and liver function dynamics post-SVR. HCC surveillance remains critical for high-risk groups. Additionally, SVR improves extrahepatic conditions like mixed cryoglobulinemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, though careful monitoring for recurrence or associated risks is advised. Reinfection in high-risk populations underscores the importance of structured prevention and retreatment strategies.
Summary: Tailored follow-up of post-SVR patients remains essential. Future research should focus on refining predictive tools for late complications and optimizing surveillance strategies, balancing cost-effectiveness with clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.