Francesco Segatta, Silvia Paggi, Franco Radaelli, Emanuele Rondonotti
{"title":"泛肠胶囊内镜下消化道出血——该改旧习惯了吗?","authors":"Francesco Segatta, Silvia Paggi, Franco Radaelli, Emanuele Rondonotti","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective tool for small bowel evaluation. Recent technical advancements, including long-lasting batteries and enhanced optics, have enabled featured capsules (panenteric capsules, PCs) to potentially assess the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The PC provides a potential easy-to-use, comprehensive, single-device approach for evaluating GI bleeding patients. This review critically examines the potential role of PC in patients with GI bleeding by highlighting benefits, limitations, open issues, and future challenges.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence on PC for GI bleeding patients remains limited. Two retrospective studies and one recent prospective trial consistently show that when used in the workup of GI bleeding patients, PC is safe, feasible, achieves high diagnostic yield (both in the small and large bowel), and potentially reduces the need for unnecessary colonoscopies. Nevertheless, current challenges include the need for extensive bowel preparation, incomplete colon evaluation, and limited access to trained readers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The PC holds promise for optimizing the diagnostic workup of GI bleeding patients. However, significant challenges remain. Robust clinical trials comparing standard diagnostic methods to PC-based workup are needed before the adoption of PC in managing bleeding patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panenteric capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding - time to change old habits?\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Segatta, Silvia Paggi, Franco Radaelli, Emanuele Rondonotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective tool for small bowel evaluation. Recent technical advancements, including long-lasting batteries and enhanced optics, have enabled featured capsules (panenteric capsules, PCs) to potentially assess the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The PC provides a potential easy-to-use, comprehensive, single-device approach for evaluating GI bleeding patients. This review critically examines the potential role of PC in patients with GI bleeding by highlighting benefits, limitations, open issues, and future challenges.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence on PC for GI bleeding patients remains limited. Two retrospective studies and one recent prospective trial consistently show that when used in the workup of GI bleeding patients, PC is safe, feasible, achieves high diagnostic yield (both in the small and large bowel), and potentially reduces the need for unnecessary colonoscopies. Nevertheless, current challenges include the need for extensive bowel preparation, incomplete colon evaluation, and limited access to trained readers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The PC holds promise for optimizing the diagnostic workup of GI bleeding patients. However, significant challenges remain. Robust clinical trials comparing standard diagnostic methods to PC-based workup are needed before the adoption of PC in managing bleeding patients in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"139-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
审查目的:胶囊内镜(CE)是评估小肠的有效工具。最近的技术进步,包括长效电池和增强型光学技术,使特色胶囊(肠管胶囊,PC)有可能评估整个胃肠道(GI)。PC 为评估消化道出血患者提供了一种潜在的易用、全面的单设备方法。本综述通过强调PC的益处、局限性、未决问题和未来挑战,对PC在消化道出血患者中的潜在作用进行了批判性研究:消化道出血患者使用 PC 的证据仍然有限。两项回顾性研究和最近的一项前瞻性试验一致表明,PC 用于消化道出血患者的检查安全、可行、诊断率高(包括小肠和大肠),并有可能减少不必要的结肠镜检查。然而,目前面临的挑战包括:需要进行大量肠道准备、结肠评估不全面以及训练有素的读片人员有限。然而,目前仍存在重大挑战。在临床实践中采用 PC 对出血患者进行管理之前,需要进行可靠的临床试验,将标准诊断方法与基于 PC 的检查方法进行比较。
Panenteric capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding - time to change old habits?
Purpose of review: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective tool for small bowel evaluation. Recent technical advancements, including long-lasting batteries and enhanced optics, have enabled featured capsules (panenteric capsules, PCs) to potentially assess the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The PC provides a potential easy-to-use, comprehensive, single-device approach for evaluating GI bleeding patients. This review critically examines the potential role of PC in patients with GI bleeding by highlighting benefits, limitations, open issues, and future challenges.
Recent findings: Evidence on PC for GI bleeding patients remains limited. Two retrospective studies and one recent prospective trial consistently show that when used in the workup of GI bleeding patients, PC is safe, feasible, achieves high diagnostic yield (both in the small and large bowel), and potentially reduces the need for unnecessary colonoscopies. Nevertheless, current challenges include the need for extensive bowel preparation, incomplete colon evaluation, and limited access to trained readers.
Summary: The PC holds promise for optimizing the diagnostic workup of GI bleeding patients. However, significant challenges remain. Robust clinical trials comparing standard diagnostic methods to PC-based workup are needed before the adoption of PC in managing bleeding patients in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.