加强患者安全教育:APSQ-III在巴西医疗保健专业学生中的跨文化验证。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Emerson Roberto Dos Santos, Rodrigo Soares Ribeiro, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Isabela Amaral de Almeida Bistafa, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Eliana Fazuoli Chubaci, Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes, Flávia Cristina Custódio, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Gustavo Schiavinato, Thalissa Catricala, José Nathan Fernandes Rocha, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Josimerci Ittavo Lamana Faria, Denise Cristina Mós Vaz Oliani, Antônio Hélio Oliani, Vânia Zaqueu Brandão, Júlio Cesar André, Rita de Cassia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro
{"title":"加强患者安全教育:APSQ-III在巴西医疗保健专业学生中的跨文化验证。","authors":"João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Emerson Roberto Dos Santos, Rodrigo Soares Ribeiro, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Isabela Amaral de Almeida Bistafa, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Eliana Fazuoli Chubaci, Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes, Flávia Cristina Custódio, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Gustavo Schiavinato, Thalissa Catricala, José Nathan Fernandes Rocha, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Josimerci Ittavo Lamana Faria, Denise Cristina Mós Vaz Oliani, Antônio Hélio Oliani, Vânia Zaqueu Brandão, Júlio Cesar André, Rita de Cassia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to adapt and validate the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III) for Brazilian Portuguese and to compare patient safety attitudes between medical and nursing students. Given the critical role of assessing safety attitudes in shaping future healthcare professionals, this research addresses a significant gap in the Brazilian educational context. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> The cross-cultural adaptation process adhered to the guidelines of for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, encompassing translation, synthesis, back-translation, and expert committee evaluation. The adapted APSQ-III was administered to a sample of 423 undergraduate students from medicine and nursing courses. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the factor structure, while reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability measures. <b>Results:</b> The CFA supported an acceptable fit for the nine-factor model with 26 items, following the exclusion of 4 items (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.92; CFI = 0.90; TLI = 0.89; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.07). Factor loadings ranged from 0.30 to 0.82, with satisfactory reliability indices, except for factors 4 (α = 0.47; ω = 0.48) and 9 (α = 0.54; ω = 0.54). Significant differences were discovered between medical and nursing students in four factors, and gender differences were noted in five items, highlighting the diverse perceptions of patient safety across these groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Brazilian version of the APSQ-III demonstrated adequate validity and reliability for seven out of the nine original factors. It is recommended to use the scale with modifications, such as developing a reduced version excluding factors with low reliability, to enhance its applicability. This study contributes to advancing patient safety research and education in Brazil, providing a robust tool for evaluating and improving safety attitudes among healthcare students. Future research should focus on refining the instrument and exploring its application in diverse healthcare educational settings across Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Patient Safety Education: Cross-Cultural Validation of the APSQ-III in Brazilian Healthcare Students.\",\"authors\":\"João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Emerson Roberto Dos Santos, Rodrigo Soares Ribeiro, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Isabela Amaral de Almeida Bistafa, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Eliana Fazuoli Chubaci, Sônia Maria Maciel Lopes, Flávia Cristina Custódio, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Gustavo Schiavinato, Thalissa Catricala, José Nathan Fernandes Rocha, Vânia Maria Sabadoto Brienze, Josimerci Ittavo Lamana Faria, Denise Cristina Mós Vaz Oliani, Antônio Hélio Oliani, Vânia Zaqueu Brandão, Júlio Cesar André, Rita de Cassia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15020033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to adapt and validate the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III) for Brazilian Portuguese and to compare patient safety attitudes between medical and nursing students. Given the critical role of assessing safety attitudes in shaping future healthcare professionals, this research addresses a significant gap in the Brazilian educational context. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> The cross-cultural adaptation process adhered to the guidelines of for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, encompassing translation, synthesis, back-translation, and expert committee evaluation. The adapted APSQ-III was administered to a sample of 423 undergraduate students from medicine and nursing courses. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the factor structure, while reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability measures. <b>Results:</b> The CFA supported an acceptable fit for the nine-factor model with 26 items, following the exclusion of 4 items (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.92; CFI = 0.90; TLI = 0.89; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.07). Factor loadings ranged from 0.30 to 0.82, with satisfactory reliability indices, except for factors 4 (α = 0.47; ω = 0.48) and 9 (α = 0.54; ω = 0.54). Significant differences were discovered between medical and nursing students in four factors, and gender differences were noted in five items, highlighting the diverse perceptions of patient safety across these groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Brazilian version of the APSQ-III demonstrated adequate validity and reliability for seven out of the nine original factors. It is recommended to use the scale with modifications, such as developing a reduced version excluding factors with low reliability, to enhance its applicability. This study contributes to advancing patient safety research and education in Brazil, providing a robust tool for evaluating and improving safety attitudes among healthcare students. Future research should focus on refining the instrument and exploring its application in diverse healthcare educational settings across Brazil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在调整和验证巴西葡萄牙语患者安全态度问卷(APSQ-III),并比较医学生和护学生的患者安全态度。鉴于评估安全态度在塑造未来医疗保健专业人员的关键作用,本研究解决了巴西教育背景下的重大差距。材料与方法:跨文化适应过程遵循《自我报告量表跨文化适应过程》的指导原则,包括翻译、综合、反译和专家委员会评估。对423名医学和护理专业本科学生进行了修改后的APSQ-III问卷调查。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)来验证因子结构,同时采用Cronbach's alpha、McDonald's omega和复合信度测量来评估信度。结果:在排除4个项目后,CFA支持包含26个项目的九因素模型的可接受拟合(χ2/df = 1.92;Cfi = 0.90;Tli = 0.89;Rmsea = 0.05;SRMR = 0.07)。因子负荷范围为0.30 ~ 0.82,除因子4 (α = 0.47;ω = 0.48)和9 (α = 0.54;ω = 0.54)。医学和护理专业学生在四个因素上存在显著差异,在五个项目上存在性别差异,突出了这些群体对患者安全的不同看法。结论:巴西版APSQ-III在9个原始因素中有7个具有足够的效度和信度。建议在使用量表时进行修改,如制定精简版本,排除可靠性低的因素,以增强其适用性。这项研究有助于推进巴西的患者安全研究和教育,为评估和改善医疗保健专业学生的安全态度提供了一个强大的工具。未来的研究应侧重于改进该工具并探索其在巴西各地不同医疗保健教育环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Patient Safety Education: Cross-Cultural Validation of the APSQ-III in Brazilian Healthcare Students.

Background: This study aimed to adapt and validate the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III) for Brazilian Portuguese and to compare patient safety attitudes between medical and nursing students. Given the critical role of assessing safety attitudes in shaping future healthcare professionals, this research addresses a significant gap in the Brazilian educational context. Materials and Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation process adhered to the guidelines of for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures, encompassing translation, synthesis, back-translation, and expert committee evaluation. The adapted APSQ-III was administered to a sample of 423 undergraduate students from medicine and nursing courses. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to verify the factor structure, while reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability measures. Results: The CFA supported an acceptable fit for the nine-factor model with 26 items, following the exclusion of 4 items (χ2/df = 1.92; CFI = 0.90; TLI = 0.89; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.07). Factor loadings ranged from 0.30 to 0.82, with satisfactory reliability indices, except for factors 4 (α = 0.47; ω = 0.48) and 9 (α = 0.54; ω = 0.54). Significant differences were discovered between medical and nursing students in four factors, and gender differences were noted in five items, highlighting the diverse perceptions of patient safety across these groups. Conclusions: The Brazilian version of the APSQ-III demonstrated adequate validity and reliability for seven out of the nine original factors. It is recommended to use the scale with modifications, such as developing a reduced version excluding factors with low reliability, to enhance its applicability. This study contributes to advancing patient safety research and education in Brazil, providing a robust tool for evaluating and improving safety attitudes among healthcare students. Future research should focus on refining the instrument and exploring its application in diverse healthcare educational settings across Brazil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信