肾移植受者每周一次使用达哌酮预防肺孢子虫肺炎的安全性

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Lauren Schumacher, Olivia Philippart, Abbey Carr, Catherine J Cj Sadler, Sravanthi Paluri
{"title":"肾移植受者每周一次使用达哌酮预防肺孢子虫肺炎的安全性","authors":"Lauren Schumacher, Olivia Philippart, Abbey Carr, Catherine J Cj Sadler, Sravanthi Paluri","doi":"10.1111/tid.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) is recommended first-line for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. In cases of sulfa allergy or intolerance, our center utilizes dapsone 100 mg once weekly as alternative prophylaxis. As both agents have the potential to cause hematologic abnormalities, we sought to compare hematologic effect profiles of weekly dapsone versus SMX-TMP in kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included kidney transplant recipients who received SMX-TMP or dapsone for PJP prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the change in hemoglobin from baseline to nadir. Secondary endpoints included hemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC) count at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplant, time to hemoglobin nadir, neutropenia incidence, and ANC nadir. In addition, we evaluated the incidence of hospital readmission, bacteremia, and PJP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 509 kidney transplant recipients were included (334 SMX-TMP vs. 175 dapsone). Median decrease in hemoglobin (g/dL) from baseline to nadir was greater in the dapsone group (0 SMX-TMP vs. -0.20 dapsone; p = 0.046). Mean absolute hemoglobin count was lower in the dapsone group at all time points. There was no difference in WBC, ANC nadir, or incidence of neutropenia at any time point between groups. Greater frequencies in readmissions (30.7% vs. 55.7%; p < 0.001) and bacteremia (3.6% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001) were observed in the dapsone arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Once-weekly dapsone is associated with statistically significant decreases in hemoglobin when compared to SMX-TMP in a kidney transplant cohort, which may be clinically relevant in select patients. Dapsone use may also increase infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Once-Weekly Dapsone for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Schumacher, Olivia Philippart, Abbey Carr, Catherine J Cj Sadler, Sravanthi Paluri\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) is recommended first-line for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. In cases of sulfa allergy or intolerance, our center utilizes dapsone 100 mg once weekly as alternative prophylaxis. As both agents have the potential to cause hematologic abnormalities, we sought to compare hematologic effect profiles of weekly dapsone versus SMX-TMP in kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included kidney transplant recipients who received SMX-TMP or dapsone for PJP prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the change in hemoglobin from baseline to nadir. Secondary endpoints included hemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC) count at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplant, time to hemoglobin nadir, neutropenia incidence, and ANC nadir. In addition, we evaluated the incidence of hospital readmission, bacteremia, and PJP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 509 kidney transplant recipients were included (334 SMX-TMP vs. 175 dapsone). Median decrease in hemoglobin (g/dL) from baseline to nadir was greater in the dapsone group (0 SMX-TMP vs. -0.20 dapsone; p = 0.046). Mean absolute hemoglobin count was lower in the dapsone group at all time points. There was no difference in WBC, ANC nadir, or incidence of neutropenia at any time point between groups. Greater frequencies in readmissions (30.7% vs. 55.7%; p < 0.001) and bacteremia (3.6% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001) were observed in the dapsone arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Once-weekly dapsone is associated with statistically significant decreases in hemoglobin when compared to SMX-TMP in a kidney transplant cohort, which may be clinically relevant in select patients. Dapsone use may also increase infection risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of Once-Weekly Dapsone for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Background: Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) is recommended first-line for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. In cases of sulfa allergy or intolerance, our center utilizes dapsone 100 mg once weekly as alternative prophylaxis. As both agents have the potential to cause hematologic abnormalities, we sought to compare hematologic effect profiles of weekly dapsone versus SMX-TMP in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included kidney transplant recipients who received SMX-TMP or dapsone for PJP prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the change in hemoglobin from baseline to nadir. Secondary endpoints included hemoglobin and white blood cell (WBC) count at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplant, time to hemoglobin nadir, neutropenia incidence, and ANC nadir. In addition, we evaluated the incidence of hospital readmission, bacteremia, and PJP.

Results: A total of 509 kidney transplant recipients were included (334 SMX-TMP vs. 175 dapsone). Median decrease in hemoglobin (g/dL) from baseline to nadir was greater in the dapsone group (0 SMX-TMP vs. -0.20 dapsone; p = 0.046). Mean absolute hemoglobin count was lower in the dapsone group at all time points. There was no difference in WBC, ANC nadir, or incidence of neutropenia at any time point between groups. Greater frequencies in readmissions (30.7% vs. 55.7%; p < 0.001) and bacteremia (3.6% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001) were observed in the dapsone arm.

Conclusions: Once-weekly dapsone is associated with statistically significant decreases in hemoglobin when compared to SMX-TMP in a kidney transplant cohort, which may be clinically relevant in select patients. Dapsone use may also increase infection risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信