Luke Arkapaw, Sonia Hines, Anthea Brand, Oliver Black, Mary Byrne, Gillian Harvey, James A Smith
{"title":"评估澳大利亚、加拿大和新西兰偏远农村地区的临床实践指南、方案和途径:一项范围审查方案。","authors":"Luke Arkapaw, Sonia Hines, Anthea Brand, Oliver Black, Mary Byrne, Gillian Harvey, James A Smith","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review protocol is to scope the extent and type of evidence describing evaluations of clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and pathways that are used in the rural and remote areas of Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the important role that clinical guidance resources can play in minimizing health disparities, it will be useful to understand what resources are being used in rural and remote health contexts and how these are being developed, implemented, and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Records will be included from 3 high-income countries which have rural or remote regions and First Nations populations. Records will only be included if they explicitly identify the clinical guidance resource, have the resource as a primary focus of the evaluation, and show that the resource has been endorsed or implemented for use in the rural or remote health service. Evaluations of point-of-care testing instruments will be excluded, as well as records from aged care facilities, even if they are from rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Emcare (Ovid), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google. Records in English will be considered for inclusion. Covidence will be used to remove duplicates and organize the selection review process. Data will be extracted using a data charting tool created by the authors. The results will be analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and presented as a series of tables and a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>The review has been registered on Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6EM32.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluations of clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and pathways used in rural and remote Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Arkapaw, Sonia Hines, Anthea Brand, Oliver Black, Mary Byrne, Gillian Harvey, James A Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review protocol is to scope the extent and type of evidence describing evaluations of clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and pathways that are used in the rural and remote areas of Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the important role that clinical guidance resources can play in minimizing health disparities, it will be useful to understand what resources are being used in rural and remote health contexts and how these are being developed, implemented, and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Records will be included from 3 high-income countries which have rural or remote regions and First Nations populations. Records will only be included if they explicitly identify the clinical guidance resource, have the resource as a primary focus of the evaluation, and show that the resource has been endorsed or implemented for use in the rural or remote health service. Evaluations of point-of-care testing instruments will be excluded, as well as records from aged care facilities, even if they are from rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Emcare (Ovid), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google. Records in English will be considered for inclusion. Covidence will be used to remove duplicates and organize the selection review process. Data will be extracted using a data charting tool created by the authors. The results will be analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and presented as a series of tables and a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>The review has been registered on Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6EM32.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述方案的目的是确定在澳大利亚、加拿大和新西兰的农村和偏远地区使用的临床实践指南、方案和途径评价的证据范围和类型。导论:鉴于临床指导资源在尽量减少健康差距方面可以发挥的重要作用,了解在农村和偏远卫生环境中正在使用哪些资源以及如何开发、实施和评估这些资源将是有用的。纳入标准:将纳入3个拥有农村或偏远地区和原住民人口的高收入国家的记录。只有明确指出临床指导资源,将该资源作为评估的主要重点,并表明该资源已被认可或实施用于农村或偏远卫生服务的记录才会被纳入。护理点检测仪器的评估将被排除在外,以及老年护理机构的记录,即使它们来自农村和偏远地区。方法:将遵循JBI方法进行范围审查。检索将在MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Emcare (Ovid)、Scopus、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses和谷歌中进行。英文记录将被考虑纳入。covid将用于删除重复和组织选择审查过程。数据将使用作者创建的数据图表工具提取。结果将使用简单的描述性统计进行分析,并以一系列表格和叙述性摘要的形式呈现。审稿注册:审稿已在Open Science Framework上注册:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6EM32。
Evaluations of clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and pathways used in rural and remote Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review protocol.
Objective: The objective of this review protocol is to scope the extent and type of evidence describing evaluations of clinical practice guidelines, protocols, and pathways that are used in the rural and remote areas of Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand.
Introduction: Given the important role that clinical guidance resources can play in minimizing health disparities, it will be useful to understand what resources are being used in rural and remote health contexts and how these are being developed, implemented, and evaluated.
Inclusion criteria: Records will be included from 3 high-income countries which have rural or remote regions and First Nations populations. Records will only be included if they explicitly identify the clinical guidance resource, have the resource as a primary focus of the evaluation, and show that the resource has been endorsed or implemented for use in the rural or remote health service. Evaluations of point-of-care testing instruments will be excluded, as well as records from aged care facilities, even if they are from rural and remote areas.
Methods: The JBI methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Emcare (Ovid), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google. Records in English will be considered for inclusion. Covidence will be used to remove duplicates and organize the selection review process. Data will be extracted using a data charting tool created by the authors. The results will be analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and presented as a series of tables and a narrative summary.
Review registration: The review has been registered on Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6EM32.