COVID-19期间和之后的远程工作:FSSB和边界管理在远程工作者幸福感中的作用。

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Vânia Sofia Carvalho, Yolanda Estreder, Maria José Chambel, Filipa Castanheira
{"title":"COVID-19期间和之后的远程工作:FSSB和边界管理在远程工作者幸福感中的作用。","authors":"Vânia Sofia Carvalho, Yolanda Estreder, Maria José Chambel, Filipa Castanheira","doi":"10.1002/smi.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telework gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, for this flexible work arrangement to be a favourable option nowadays, specific conditions may be necessary such as supervisory support (FSSB) and boundary management strategies. Nonetheless, telework conditions during COVID-19 may have differed from those after the pandemic. Drawing on border theory and the conservation of resources theory, FSSB is framed in this paper as an important contextual resource for teleworkers' well-being. Furthermore, boundary management strategies (i.e., boundary control and enacted work-family segmentation) are explored as linking mechanisms between FSSB and teleworkers' well-being. Study 1, with a cross-sectional design, captured telework during COVID-19, and Study 2, with a daily design, captured telework after COVID-19 with the moderating role of frequency of daily changes in the workplace, that is, telework and in-house work. Consistent findings were observed across both studies indicating not only the critical role of FSSB for teleworkers' well-being (i.e., burnout and work engagement) but also the boundary management strategies as mediators. Moreover, Study 2 reveals that the fewer the changes in the workplace, the more FSSB are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telework During and After COVID-19: The Role of FSSB and Boundary Management in Teleworkers' Well-Being.\",\"authors\":\"Vânia Sofia Carvalho, Yolanda Estreder, Maria José Chambel, Filipa Castanheira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smi.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Telework gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, for this flexible work arrangement to be a favourable option nowadays, specific conditions may be necessary such as supervisory support (FSSB) and boundary management strategies. Nonetheless, telework conditions during COVID-19 may have differed from those after the pandemic. Drawing on border theory and the conservation of resources theory, FSSB is framed in this paper as an important contextual resource for teleworkers' well-being. Furthermore, boundary management strategies (i.e., boundary control and enacted work-family segmentation) are explored as linking mechanisms between FSSB and teleworkers' well-being. Study 1, with a cross-sectional design, captured telework during COVID-19, and Study 2, with a daily design, captured telework after COVID-19 with the moderating role of frequency of daily changes in the workplace, that is, telework and in-house work. Consistent findings were observed across both studies indicating not only the critical role of FSSB for teleworkers' well-being (i.e., burnout and work engagement) but also the boundary management strategies as mediators. Moreover, Study 2 reveals that the fewer the changes in the workplace, the more FSSB are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress and Health\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e70019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程办公得到了普及。然而,要使这种灵活的工作安排成为一种有利的选择,可能需要特定的条件,例如监管支持(FSSB)和边界管理策略。尽管如此,COVID-19期间的远程工作条件可能与大流行后的情况有所不同。借鉴边界理论和资源保护理论,本文将远程工作者的社交服务作为一种重要的情境资源。此外,本文还探讨了边界管理策略(即边界控制和制定的工作-家庭分割)作为远程工作者家庭工作与幸福感之间的联系机制。研究1采用横断面设计,在COVID-19期间捕获远程工作;研究2采用日常设计,在工作场所的日常变化频率(即远程工作和内部工作)的调节作用下捕获COVID-19后的远程工作。两项研究的一致发现不仅表明FSSB对远程工作者的幸福感(即倦怠和工作投入)的关键作用,而且表明边界管理策略是中介。此外,研究2显示,工作场所的变化越少,对FSSB的需求就越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telework During and After COVID-19: The Role of FSSB and Boundary Management in Teleworkers' Well-Being.

Telework gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, for this flexible work arrangement to be a favourable option nowadays, specific conditions may be necessary such as supervisory support (FSSB) and boundary management strategies. Nonetheless, telework conditions during COVID-19 may have differed from those after the pandemic. Drawing on border theory and the conservation of resources theory, FSSB is framed in this paper as an important contextual resource for teleworkers' well-being. Furthermore, boundary management strategies (i.e., boundary control and enacted work-family segmentation) are explored as linking mechanisms between FSSB and teleworkers' well-being. Study 1, with a cross-sectional design, captured telework during COVID-19, and Study 2, with a daily design, captured telework after COVID-19 with the moderating role of frequency of daily changes in the workplace, that is, telework and in-house work. Consistent findings were observed across both studies indicating not only the critical role of FSSB for teleworkers' well-being (i.e., burnout and work engagement) but also the boundary management strategies as mediators. Moreover, Study 2 reveals that the fewer the changes in the workplace, the more FSSB are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信