眼科学中的社交媒体：综合文献综述。

IF 5.9 2区医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Survey of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.003

Jennifer K. Dunnigan BS , Celeste Y. Wang BA , Livia George BS , Virginia A. Lee , Kevin E. Lai MD , Andrew R. Carey MD , Andrew G. Lee MD

{"title":"眼科学中的社交媒体：综合文献综述。","authors":"Jennifer K. Dunnigan BS , Celeste Y. Wang BA , Livia George BS , Virginia A. Lee , Kevin E. Lai MD , Andrew R. Carey MD , Andrew G. Lee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the role of social media in ophthalmology, focusing on its impact on patient education, professional networking, and practice promotion. An English language, PubMed search from 2019 to 2024 was performed using the search terms: “social media” and “ophthalmology” on PubMed. An analysis based on the existing usage patterns and impact/effect of social media platforms in ophthalmology was performed and is described. Fifty-five papers were included in the review. Social media enhance patient engagement and education with varying content quality. Platforms like X and YouTube have the potential to offer valuable educational content, while Instagram and TikTok foster interactive user engagement. Despite these benefits, misinformation, patient confidentiality, and time commitment remain a considerable issue. Social media provide substantial advantages for ophthalmologists, but requires careful management to address the spread of inaccurate information and ensure content quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 817-824"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media in ophthalmology: A comprehensive literature review\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K. Dunnigan BS , Celeste Y. Wang BA , Livia George BS , Virginia A. Lee , Kevin E. Lai MD , Andrew R. Carey MD , Andrew G. Lee MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine the role of social media in ophthalmology, focusing on its impact on patient education, professional networking, and practice promotion. An English language, PubMed search from 2019 to 2024 was performed using the search terms: “social media” and “ophthalmology” on PubMed. An analysis based on the existing usage patterns and impact/effect of social media platforms in ophthalmology was performed and is described. Fifty-five papers were included in the review. Social media enhance patient engagement and education with varying content quality. Platforms like X and YouTube have the potential to offer valuable educational content, while Instagram and TikTok foster interactive user engagement. Despite these benefits, misinformation, patient confidentiality, and time commitment remain a considerable issue. Social media provide substantial advantages for ophthalmologists, but requires careful management to address the spread of inaccurate information and ensure content quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 817-824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000311\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了社交媒体在眼科中的作用，重点关注其对患者教育、专业网络和实践推广的影响。在PubMed上使用搜索词“社交媒体”和“眼科”进行了2019年至2024年的英语PubMed搜索。基于现有的使用模式和社交媒体平台对眼科的影响/效果进行了分析，并进行了描述。这篇综述收录了55篇论文。社交媒体通过不同的内容质量提高了患者的参与度和教育。像X和YouTube这样的平台有潜力提供有价值的教育内容，而Instagram和TikTok则促进了用户的互动参与。尽管有这些好处，但错误信息、患者保密和时间承诺仍然是一个相当大的问题。社交媒体为眼科医生提供了巨大的优势，但需要仔细管理，以解决不准确信息的传播并确保内容质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Social media in ophthalmology: A comprehensive literature review

We examine the role of social media in ophthalmology, focusing on its impact on patient education, professional networking, and practice promotion. An English language, PubMed search from 2019 to 2024 was performed using the search terms: “social media” and “ophthalmology” on PubMed. An analysis based on the existing usage patterns and impact/effect of social media platforms in ophthalmology was performed and is described. Fifty-five papers were included in the review. Social media enhance patient engagement and education with varying content quality. Platforms like X and YouTube have the potential to offer valuable educational content, while Instagram and TikTok foster interactive user engagement. Despite these benefits, misinformation, patient confidentiality, and time commitment remain a considerable issue. Social media provide substantial advantages for ophthalmologists, but requires careful management to address the spread of inaccurate information and ensure content quality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

2.00%

发文量

138

审稿时长

14.8 weeks

期刊介绍： Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.