听力损失和负面社会经历在我们所有人的研究项目。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1176
Angela Renne, Jenny X Chen
{"title":"听力损失和负面社会经历在我们所有人的研究项目。","authors":"Angela Renne, Jenny X Chen","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of demographic characteristics on negative social experiences for individuals with bilateral hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A 1:1 matched case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants with and without bilateral hearing loss in the All of Us Research Program database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable logistic ordinal regression, controlling for various demographic and health factors, examined the association between hearing loss and self-reports of isolation, discrimination, stress, and poor health care experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9050 participants had bilateral hearing loss. Compared to matched controls, those with hearing loss had greater odds of reporting isolation (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.21, P < .001), discrimination (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40, P < .001) but not health care experiences. Younger (18-39) and middle-aged adults (40-64) reported higher isolation (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.41-3.24, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.82-2.15, P < .001 [40-64]), discrimination (OR 4.49, 95% CI 3.51-5.73, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.45-3.00, P < .001 [40-64]), and stress (OR 6.67, 95% CI 5.22-8.53, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.38, 95% CI 2.14-2.64, P < .001 [40-64]) compared to those older than 65. Females with hearing loss reported more isolation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.23, P < .01), discrimination (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.63, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.73-1.99, P < .001). Severe hearing loss was associated with worse outcomes. Hearing aids were not protective against negative social experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain demographic factors were associated with negative social experiences in individuals with bilateral hearing loss. Future interventions should account for these differences.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1640-1648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing Loss and Negative Social Experiences in the All of Us Research Program.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Renne, Jenny X Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of demographic characteristics on negative social experiences for individuals with bilateral hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A 1:1 matched case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants with and without bilateral hearing loss in the All of Us Research Program database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable logistic ordinal regression, controlling for various demographic and health factors, examined the association between hearing loss and self-reports of isolation, discrimination, stress, and poor health care experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9050 participants had bilateral hearing loss. Compared to matched controls, those with hearing loss had greater odds of reporting isolation (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.21, P < .001), discrimination (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40, P < .001) but not health care experiences. Younger (18-39) and middle-aged adults (40-64) reported higher isolation (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.41-3.24, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.82-2.15, P < .001 [40-64]), discrimination (OR 4.49, 95% CI 3.51-5.73, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.45-3.00, P < .001 [40-64]), and stress (OR 6.67, 95% CI 5.22-8.53, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.38, 95% CI 2.14-2.64, P < .001 [40-64]) compared to those older than 65. Females with hearing loss reported more isolation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.23, P < .01), discrimination (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.63, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.73-1.99, P < .001). Severe hearing loss was associated with worse outcomes. Hearing aids were not protective against negative social experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain demographic factors were associated with negative social experiences in individuals with bilateral hearing loss. Future interventions should account for these differences.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1640-1648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估人口统计学特征对双侧听力损失个体负性社会经历的影响。研究设计:1:1匹配病例对照研究。环境:所有人研究项目数据库中有和没有双侧听力损失的参与者。方法:多变量logistic有序回归,控制各种人口统计学和健康因素,研究听力损失与自我报告的孤立、歧视、压力和不良医疗经历之间的关系。结果:共有9050名参与者出现双侧听力损失。与匹配的对照组相比,听力损失患者报告孤立的几率更大(优势比[OR] 1.15, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.09-1.21, P)。结论:某些人口统计学因素与双侧听力损失患者的负面社会经历有关。未来的干预措施应该考虑到这些差异。证据等级:3;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hearing Loss and Negative Social Experiences in the All of Us Research Program.

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of demographic characteristics on negative social experiences for individuals with bilateral hearing loss.

Study design: A 1:1 matched case-control study.

Setting: Participants with and without bilateral hearing loss in the All of Us Research Program database.

Methods: Multivariable logistic ordinal regression, controlling for various demographic and health factors, examined the association between hearing loss and self-reports of isolation, discrimination, stress, and poor health care experiences.

Results: A total of 9050 participants had bilateral hearing loss. Compared to matched controls, those with hearing loss had greater odds of reporting isolation (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.21, P < .001), discrimination (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40, P < .001) but not health care experiences. Younger (18-39) and middle-aged adults (40-64) reported higher isolation (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.41-3.24, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.82-2.15, P < .001 [40-64]), discrimination (OR 4.49, 95% CI 3.51-5.73, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.45-3.00, P < .001 [40-64]), and stress (OR 6.67, 95% CI 5.22-8.53, P < .001 [18-39]; OR 2.38, 95% CI 2.14-2.64, P < .001 [40-64]) compared to those older than 65. Females with hearing loss reported more isolation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.23, P < .01), discrimination (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.63, P < .001), and stress (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.73-1.99, P < .001). Severe hearing loss was associated with worse outcomes. Hearing aids were not protective against negative social experiences.

Conclusion: Certain demographic factors were associated with negative social experiences in individuals with bilateral hearing loss. Future interventions should account for these differences.

Level of evidence: 3:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信