绘制耳鼻喉头颈外科培训项目的指导景观:一项跨加拿大调查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1166
Tanya Chen, Jennifer A Silver, Hadi Seikaly, Lily H P Nguyen, Yvonne Chan
{"title":"绘制耳鼻喉头颈外科培训项目的指导景观:一项跨加拿大调查。","authors":"Tanya Chen, Jennifer A Silver, Hadi Seikaly, Lily H P Nguyen, Yvonne Chan","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the current landscape of mentorship within Canadian Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) programs by investigating the experiences and perspectives of OHNS trainees and program directors (PDs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymized online questionnaires were sent to all residents and PDs of the 13 accredited OHNS residency programs across Canada. The questionnaires collected qualitative and quantitative information about the type of mentorship (formal vs informal) programs implemented, as well as individuals' experiences and opinions on mentorship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of residents, 57.1% (92/161) completed the survey, whereas 84.6% (11/13) of PDs completed the survey. Of residents, 45.7% (42/92) participated in formal mentorship programs and 72.8% (67/92) participated in informal mentorship programs. The PDs perceived the importance of formal mentorship at 3.0/5. Residents reported greater satisfaction with informal mentorship relationships compared to formal mentorship (4.4/5 vs 3.7/5, P < .01) due to a more organic initiation of relationship and a better personality match. The main areas for improvement of current mentorship programs included the availability of mentors, networking opportunities, and protected time for encounters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical residents found informal mentorship to be more beneficial than formal mentorship. However, residency programs should provide more guidance and structure to optimize hybrid mentorship opportunities and mentor selection/availability. Mentorship training or development resources for attending physicians and feedback opportunities are essential for efficient relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1617-1624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the Mentorship Landscape in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Training Programs: A Cross-Canadian Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Chen, Jennifer A Silver, Hadi Seikaly, Lily H P Nguyen, Yvonne Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the current landscape of mentorship within Canadian Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) programs by investigating the experiences and perspectives of OHNS trainees and program directors (PDs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymized online questionnaires were sent to all residents and PDs of the 13 accredited OHNS residency programs across Canada. The questionnaires collected qualitative and quantitative information about the type of mentorship (formal vs informal) programs implemented, as well as individuals' experiences and opinions on mentorship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of residents, 57.1% (92/161) completed the survey, whereas 84.6% (11/13) of PDs completed the survey. Of residents, 45.7% (42/92) participated in formal mentorship programs and 72.8% (67/92) participated in informal mentorship programs. The PDs perceived the importance of formal mentorship at 3.0/5. Residents reported greater satisfaction with informal mentorship relationships compared to formal mentorship (4.4/5 vs 3.7/5, P < .01) due to a more organic initiation of relationship and a better personality match. The main areas for improvement of current mentorship programs included the availability of mentors, networking opportunities, and protected time for encounters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical residents found informal mentorship to be more beneficial than formal mentorship. However, residency programs should provide more guidance and structure to optimize hybrid mentorship opportunities and mentor selection/availability. Mentorship training or development resources for attending physicians and feedback opportunities are essential for efficient relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1617-1624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过调查加拿大耳鼻喉头颈外科(OHNS)项目学员和项目主任(pd)的经验和观点,探讨目前加拿大耳鼻喉头颈外科(OHNS)项目指导的现状。研究设计:横断面调查研究。方法:将匿名在线问卷发送给加拿大13个OHNS认证居住计划的所有居民和pd。问卷收集了关于实施的师友项目类型(正式与非正式)的定性和定量信息,以及个人对师友的经验和意见。结果:57.1%的居民(92/161)完成了调查,而84.6%的pd(11/13)完成了调查。45.7%(42/92)的居民参加了正式的师徒计划,72.8%(67/92)的居民参加了非正式的师徒计划。pd认为正式指导的重要性为3.0/5。与正式师徒关系相比,住院医师对非正式师徒关系的满意度更高(4.4/5 vs 3.7/5, P)。结论:外科住院医师认为非正式师徒关系比正式师徒关系更有益。然而,实习计划应该提供更多的指导和结构,以优化混合指导机会和导师选择/可用性。为主治医生提供指导培训或发展资源以及反馈机会对于有效的关系至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the Mentorship Landscape in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Training Programs: A Cross-Canadian Survey.

Objective: This study aims to explore the current landscape of mentorship within Canadian Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) programs by investigating the experiences and perspectives of OHNS trainees and program directors (PDs).

Study design: A cross-sectional survey study.

Methods: Anonymized online questionnaires were sent to all residents and PDs of the 13 accredited OHNS residency programs across Canada. The questionnaires collected qualitative and quantitative information about the type of mentorship (formal vs informal) programs implemented, as well as individuals' experiences and opinions on mentorship.

Results: Of residents, 57.1% (92/161) completed the survey, whereas 84.6% (11/13) of PDs completed the survey. Of residents, 45.7% (42/92) participated in formal mentorship programs and 72.8% (67/92) participated in informal mentorship programs. The PDs perceived the importance of formal mentorship at 3.0/5. Residents reported greater satisfaction with informal mentorship relationships compared to formal mentorship (4.4/5 vs 3.7/5, P < .01) due to a more organic initiation of relationship and a better personality match. The main areas for improvement of current mentorship programs included the availability of mentors, networking opportunities, and protected time for encounters.

Conclusion: Surgical residents found informal mentorship to be more beneficial than formal mentorship. However, residency programs should provide more guidance and structure to optimize hybrid mentorship opportunities and mentor selection/availability. Mentorship training or development resources for attending physicians and feedback opportunities are essential for efficient relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信