在近暗视靶点的额外调节控制不能改善年轻人的调节反应。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/opo.13476
John Siderov, Baskar Theagarayan, Muneebah Zahir, Niall J Hynes
{"title":"在近暗视靶点的额外调节控制不能改善年轻人的调节反应。","authors":"John Siderov, Baskar Theagarayan, Muneebah Zahir, Niall J Hynes","doi":"10.1111/opo.13476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated newly designed tests to measure near heterophoria, comparing them to the Maddox Wing and Howell card, and assessed whether accommodative responses differed between the different heterophoria test targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Near horizontal heterophoria of 20 visually normal young adults was measured using the Maddox Wing, Howell Card and two versions of a newly designed Huddersfield Heterophoria Test (HHT) card. The HHT cards are based on the Prentice method, either with or without an additional spatially defined grating superimposed on the scale. The addition of a spatially defined grating has been suggested to control accommodation better. A single examiner was used to take measurements on two separate occasions, presenting each test in a random order. Monocular accommodative responses to each heterophoria target were also obtained in a separate session by another examiner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heterophoria measurements between the four tests were not significantly different, neither clinically nor statistically. Differences in test-retest measurements between test and retest conditions were small and not significantly different. Mean accommodative responses were also not significantly different between the test targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in target configurations in the Maddox Wing, Howell card or new HHT cards did not influence accommodative responses in a sample of young adults. The newly designed HHT cards (or other variations of the Prentice method) may be used to measure near horizontal heterophoria in a young adult population either with or without additional horizontal lines superimposed on the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"752-760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional accommodative controls in near heterophoria targets do not improve accommodative responses in young adults.\",\"authors\":\"John Siderov, Baskar Theagarayan, Muneebah Zahir, Niall J Hynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated newly designed tests to measure near heterophoria, comparing them to the Maddox Wing and Howell card, and assessed whether accommodative responses differed between the different heterophoria test targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Near horizontal heterophoria of 20 visually normal young adults was measured using the Maddox Wing, Howell Card and two versions of a newly designed Huddersfield Heterophoria Test (HHT) card. The HHT cards are based on the Prentice method, either with or without an additional spatially defined grating superimposed on the scale. The addition of a spatially defined grating has been suggested to control accommodation better. A single examiner was used to take measurements on two separate occasions, presenting each test in a random order. Monocular accommodative responses to each heterophoria target were also obtained in a separate session by another examiner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heterophoria measurements between the four tests were not significantly different, neither clinically nor statistically. Differences in test-retest measurements between test and retest conditions were small and not significantly different. Mean accommodative responses were also not significantly different between the test targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in target configurations in the Maddox Wing, Howell card or new HHT cards did not influence accommodative responses in a sample of young adults. The newly designed HHT cards (or other variations of the Prentice method) may be used to measure near horizontal heterophoria in a young adult population either with or without additional horizontal lines superimposed on the scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"752-760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13476\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了新设计的测量近暗视的测试,将其与Maddox Wing和Howell卡进行比较,并评估不同暗视测试目标之间的调节反应是否存在差异。方法:采用Maddox Wing、Howell Card和两种新设计的Huddersfield斜视测验(HHT)卡对20例视力正常的青年近水平斜视进行测量。HHT卡是基于普伦蒂斯方法,或有或没有一个额外的空间定义光栅叠加在规模。建议增加一个空间定义的光栅来更好地控制调节。一名审查员被用来在两个不同的场合进行测量,以随机顺序呈现每个测试。对每个斜视目标的单眼调节反应也由另一个审查员在单独的会议中获得。结果:四项试验间的斜视测量值无显著差异,无论在临床还是统计学上均无显著差异。测试和复测条件之间的测试-复测测量差异很小,差异不显著。平均调节反应在测试对象之间也无显著差异。结论:Maddox Wing、Howell card或新HHT card的目标配置差异不影响年轻人样本中的适应性反应。新设计的HHT卡片(或普伦蒂斯方法的其他变体)可用于测量年轻人的近水平斜视,在量表上可以添加或不添加额外的水平线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Additional accommodative controls in near heterophoria targets do not improve accommodative responses in young adults.

Purpose: This study evaluated newly designed tests to measure near heterophoria, comparing them to the Maddox Wing and Howell card, and assessed whether accommodative responses differed between the different heterophoria test targets.

Methods: Near horizontal heterophoria of 20 visually normal young adults was measured using the Maddox Wing, Howell Card and two versions of a newly designed Huddersfield Heterophoria Test (HHT) card. The HHT cards are based on the Prentice method, either with or without an additional spatially defined grating superimposed on the scale. The addition of a spatially defined grating has been suggested to control accommodation better. A single examiner was used to take measurements on two separate occasions, presenting each test in a random order. Monocular accommodative responses to each heterophoria target were also obtained in a separate session by another examiner.

Results: Heterophoria measurements between the four tests were not significantly different, neither clinically nor statistically. Differences in test-retest measurements between test and retest conditions were small and not significantly different. Mean accommodative responses were also not significantly different between the test targets.

Conclusions: Differences in target configurations in the Maddox Wing, Howell card or new HHT cards did not influence accommodative responses in a sample of young adults. The newly designed HHT cards (or other variations of the Prentice method) may be used to measure near horizontal heterophoria in a young adult population either with or without additional horizontal lines superimposed on the scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信