机器学习随机森林算法从非睫状体麻痹的临床数据预测睫状体麻痹后近视矫正。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000002230
Yansong Hao, Xianjiang Wang, Bin Sun, Jinyu Li, Yuexin Zhang, Shanhao Jiang
{"title":"机器学习随机森林算法从非睫状体麻痹的临床数据预测睫状体麻痹后近视矫正。","authors":"Yansong Hao, Xianjiang Wang, Bin Sun, Jinyu Li, Yuexin Zhang, Shanhao Jiang","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Machine learning random forest algorithms were used to predict objective refractive outcomes after cycloplegic refraction using noncycloplegic clinical data. A classification model predicted post-cycloplegic myopia and could be useful in screening, and a second regression model predicted post-cycloplegic refractive and could provide a useful objective starting point in noncycloplegic subjective refractions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A classification model sought to predict post-cycloplegic myopia using noncycloplegic clinical data to enhance myopia screening accuracy, whereas the regression model looked to predict objective refraction outcomes after cycloplegia for use as a starting point for noncycloplegic subjective refraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study included data from 2483 eyes. Pre-refraction measurements, such as uncorrected visual acuity, axial length, and corneal curvature radius, were recorded. After cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent was measured. Random forest-based classification and regression models were established with input variables including age, gender, axial length, corneal curvature radius, axial length-to-corneal curvature radius ratio, spherical equivalent, and uncorrected visual acuity. Model performance was assessed using various metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest classification model achieved high out-of-bag validation accuracy (92%), cross-validation accuracy (93%), external validation accuracy (94%), and precision (95%). The external validation sensitivity was 93%, and specificity was 95%. The regression model internal validation showed an out-of-bag validation R2 of 0.86, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.66, and mean absolute error of 0.49. The 10-fold cross-validation R2 was 0.87, the RMSE was 0.64, and the mean absolute error was 0.48. In the external validation, R2 was 0.88, the RMSE was 0.63, and the mean absolute error was 0.48.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By analyzing noncycloplegic clinical data, the classification model enables earlier detection of myopia, supporting timely intervention and management. The regression model aims to accurately predict post-cycloplegia myopic corrections, providing reliable initial data for subjective refraction. This could help optometrists perform noncycloplegic subjective refraction more efficiently and is particularly relevant in China, where retinoscopy is not yet fully popularized and many school students decline cycloplegic refraction due to academic pressures and limited free time, primarily because it requires a follow-up the next day.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":"138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning random forest algorithms predict post-cycloplegic myopic corrections from noncycloplegic clinical data.\",\"authors\":\"Yansong Hao, Xianjiang Wang, Bin Sun, Jinyu Li, Yuexin Zhang, Shanhao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Machine learning random forest algorithms were used to predict objective refractive outcomes after cycloplegic refraction using noncycloplegic clinical data. A classification model predicted post-cycloplegic myopia and could be useful in screening, and a second regression model predicted post-cycloplegic refractive and could provide a useful objective starting point in noncycloplegic subjective refractions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A classification model sought to predict post-cycloplegic myopia using noncycloplegic clinical data to enhance myopia screening accuracy, whereas the regression model looked to predict objective refraction outcomes after cycloplegia for use as a starting point for noncycloplegic subjective refraction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study included data from 2483 eyes. Pre-refraction measurements, such as uncorrected visual acuity, axial length, and corneal curvature radius, were recorded. After cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent was measured. Random forest-based classification and regression models were established with input variables including age, gender, axial length, corneal curvature radius, axial length-to-corneal curvature radius ratio, spherical equivalent, and uncorrected visual acuity. Model performance was assessed using various metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest classification model achieved high out-of-bag validation accuracy (92%), cross-validation accuracy (93%), external validation accuracy (94%), and precision (95%). The external validation sensitivity was 93%, and specificity was 95%. The regression model internal validation showed an out-of-bag validation R2 of 0.86, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.66, and mean absolute error of 0.49. The 10-fold cross-validation R2 was 0.87, the RMSE was 0.64, and the mean absolute error was 0.48. In the external validation, R2 was 0.88, the RMSE was 0.63, and the mean absolute error was 0.48.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By analyzing noncycloplegic clinical data, the classification model enables earlier detection of myopia, supporting timely intervention and management. The regression model aims to accurately predict post-cycloplegia myopic corrections, providing reliable initial data for subjective refraction. This could help optometrists perform noncycloplegic subjective refraction more efficiently and is particularly relevant in China, where retinoscopy is not yet fully popularized and many school students decline cycloplegic refraction due to academic pressures and limited free time, primarily because it requires a follow-up the next day.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"138-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:采用机器学习随机森林算法,利用非睫状体麻痹患者的临床资料预测睫状体麻痹患者屈光后的客观屈光结果。分类模型预测后睫状体麻痹近视,可用于筛选,第二个回归模型预测后睫状体麻痹屈光,可提供一个有用的客观起点,非睫状体麻痹主观屈光。目的:一个分类模型试图利用非睫状体麻痹的临床数据来预测睫状体麻痹后的近视,以提高近视筛查的准确性,而回归模型旨在预测睫状体麻痹后的客观屈光结果,作为非睫状体麻痹后主观屈光的起点。方法:横断面研究包括2483只眼睛的数据。记录前屈光测量,如未矫正视力、眼轴长度和角膜曲率半径。睫状体麻痹后,测量球面当量。以年龄、性别、眼轴长度、角膜曲率半径、眼轴长度与角膜曲率半径之比、球面等效度和未矫正视力为输入变量,建立基于随机森林的分类和回归模型。使用各种指标评估模型性能。结果:随机森林分类模型具有较高的袋外验证准确率(92%)、交叉验证准确率(93%)、外部验证准确率(94%)和精密度(95%)。外部验证灵敏度为93%,特异性为95%。回归模型内部验证结果显示,袋外验证R2为0.86,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.66,平均绝对误差为0.49。10倍交叉验证R2为0.87,RMSE为0.64,平均绝对误差为0.48。外部验证时,R2为0.88,RMSE为0.63,平均绝对误差为0.48。结论:通过分析非睫状体麻痹患者的临床资料,该分类模型可以早期发现近视,及时干预和处理。回归模型旨在准确预测睫状体麻痹后近视矫正,为主观屈光提供可靠的初始数据。这可以帮助验光师更有效地进行非睫状体麻痹的主观屈光检查,在中国尤其重要,在中国,视网膜镜检查尚未完全普及,许多学生由于学业压力和空闲时间有限而减少了睫状体麻痹的屈光检查,主要是因为它需要第二天进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine-learning random forest algorithms predict post-cycloplegic myopic corrections from noncycloplegic clinical data.

Significance: Machine learning random forest algorithms were used to predict objective refractive outcomes after cycloplegic refraction using noncycloplegic clinical data. A classification model predicted post-cycloplegic myopia and could be useful in screening, and a second regression model predicted post-cycloplegic refractive and could provide a useful objective starting point in noncycloplegic subjective refractions.

Purpose: A classification model sought to predict post-cycloplegic myopia using noncycloplegic clinical data to enhance myopia screening accuracy, whereas the regression model looked to predict objective refraction outcomes after cycloplegia for use as a starting point for noncycloplegic subjective refraction.

Methods: A cross-sectional study included data from 2483 eyes. Pre-refraction measurements, such as uncorrected visual acuity, axial length, and corneal curvature radius, were recorded. After cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent was measured. Random forest-based classification and regression models were established with input variables including age, gender, axial length, corneal curvature radius, axial length-to-corneal curvature radius ratio, spherical equivalent, and uncorrected visual acuity. Model performance was assessed using various metrics.

Results: The random forest classification model achieved high out-of-bag validation accuracy (92%), cross-validation accuracy (93%), external validation accuracy (94%), and precision (95%). The external validation sensitivity was 93%, and specificity was 95%. The regression model internal validation showed an out-of-bag validation R2 of 0.86, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.66, and mean absolute error of 0.49. The 10-fold cross-validation R2 was 0.87, the RMSE was 0.64, and the mean absolute error was 0.48. In the external validation, R2 was 0.88, the RMSE was 0.63, and the mean absolute error was 0.48.

Conclusions: By analyzing noncycloplegic clinical data, the classification model enables earlier detection of myopia, supporting timely intervention and management. The regression model aims to accurately predict post-cycloplegia myopic corrections, providing reliable initial data for subjective refraction. This could help optometrists perform noncycloplegic subjective refraction more efficiently and is particularly relevant in China, where retinoscopy is not yet fully popularized and many school students decline cycloplegic refraction due to academic pressures and limited free time, primarily because it requires a follow-up the next day.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信