癫痫作为原发性肿瘤表现与老年胶质母细胞瘤患者的状态、年龄和肿瘤体积相关,但与生存无关:一项回顾性双中心分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matthias Demetz, Constantin Hecker, Hamza Adel Salim, Aleksandrs Krigers, Jürgen Steinbacher, Lukas Machegger, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Melanie Buchta, Johannes Pöppe, Philipp Geiger, Antonio Spinello, Theo F J Kraus, Christoph J Griessenauer, Claudius Thomé, Christian F Freyschlag, Christoph Schwartz
{"title":"癫痫作为原发性肿瘤表现与老年胶质母细胞瘤患者的状态、年龄和肿瘤体积相关,但与生存无关:一项回顾性双中心分析。","authors":"Matthias Demetz, Constantin Hecker, Hamza Adel Salim, Aleksandrs Krigers, Jürgen Steinbacher, Lukas Machegger, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Melanie Buchta, Johannes Pöppe, Philipp Geiger, Antonio Spinello, Theo F J Kraus, Christoph J Griessenauer, Claudius Thomé, Christian F Freyschlag, Christoph Schwartz","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03397-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment of the potential impact of epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation on survival in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Two academic neurosurgical centers retrospectively analyzed all GBM patients aged 65 years and older with de-novo tumors, who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2021. Epidemiological, histopathological, imaging and survival data were obtained from patients' electronic charts, and screened for the presence of epilepsy preoperatively and during follow-up. Patient status was assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), epilepsy was evaluated using the Engel classification. Patients were categorized in an epilepsy cohort (i.e. patients with epilepsy as primary GBM manifestation, and a reference cohort (i.e. patients with no initial epilepsy). This study analyzed 451 GBM patients (55% males); median age at tumor diagnosis was 73 years. The epilepsy cohort was younger (71.0 vs. 74.0 year; p = 0.001), had better KPS (80 vs. 70; p = 0.039), and had smaller tumors (127 vs. 221 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.001) compared to the reference cohort. There were no differences with regard to neurosurgical treatment (i.e. resection vs. biopsy), tumor biomarkers, surgery-associated complications, and performed adjuvant treatment (all p > 0.05). We did not detect a significant difference in median survival between the epilepsy and reference cohorts (8 vs. 6 months; p = 0.21). New epilepsy during follow-up often coincided with tumor recurrence/progression, but also did not significantly affect survival. The majority of patients (98%) achieved seizure freedom by a combination of tumor-specific treatments and antiseizure medication. Epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation does not correlate with survival in elderly GBM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation correlates with patient status, age, and tumor volume but not with survival in elderly glioblastoma patients: a retrospective bicentric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Demetz, Constantin Hecker, Hamza Adel Salim, Aleksandrs Krigers, Jürgen Steinbacher, Lukas Machegger, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Melanie Buchta, Johannes Pöppe, Philipp Geiger, Antonio Spinello, Theo F J Kraus, Christoph J Griessenauer, Claudius Thomé, Christian F Freyschlag, Christoph Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03397-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessment of the potential impact of epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation on survival in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Two academic neurosurgical centers retrospectively analyzed all GBM patients aged 65 years and older with de-novo tumors, who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2021. Epidemiological, histopathological, imaging and survival data were obtained from patients' electronic charts, and screened for the presence of epilepsy preoperatively and during follow-up. Patient status was assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), epilepsy was evaluated using the Engel classification. Patients were categorized in an epilepsy cohort (i.e. patients with epilepsy as primary GBM manifestation, and a reference cohort (i.e. patients with no initial epilepsy). This study analyzed 451 GBM patients (55% males); median age at tumor diagnosis was 73 years. The epilepsy cohort was younger (71.0 vs. 74.0 year; p = 0.001), had better KPS (80 vs. 70; p = 0.039), and had smaller tumors (127 vs. 221 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.001) compared to the reference cohort. There were no differences with regard to neurosurgical treatment (i.e. resection vs. biopsy), tumor biomarkers, surgery-associated complications, and performed adjuvant treatment (all p > 0.05). We did not detect a significant difference in median survival between the epilepsy and reference cohorts (8 vs. 6 months; p = 0.21). New epilepsy during follow-up often coincided with tumor recurrence/progression, but also did not significantly affect survival. The majority of patients (98%) achieved seizure freedom by a combination of tumor-specific treatments and antiseizure medication. Epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation does not correlate with survival in elderly GBM patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850559/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03397-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03397-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估癫痫作为原发性肿瘤表现对老年多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者生存的潜在影响。两个学术神经外科中心回顾性分析了2006年至2021年间接受手术的所有65岁及以上的新生肿瘤GBM患者。从患者的电子病历中获取流行病学、组织病理学、影像学和生存数据,并在术前和随访期间筛查癫痫的存在。采用Karnofsky表现量表(KPS)评估患者状态,采用Engel分类评估癫痫程度。患者被分为癫痫队列(即以癫痫为原发性GBM表现的患者)和参考队列(即无首发癫痫的患者)。本研究分析了451例GBM患者(55%为男性);肿瘤诊断时的中位年龄为73岁。癫痫队列更年轻(71.0岁vs. 74.0岁;p = 0.001), KPS较好(80比70;P = 0.039),且肿瘤较小(127比221 cm3;P = 0.001)。在神经外科治疗(即切除与活检)、肿瘤生物标志物、手术相关并发症和辅助治疗方面,两组无差异(均p < 0.05)。我们没有发现癫痫组和参考组的中位生存期有显著差异(8个月vs 6个月;p = 0.21)。随访期间新发癫痫常与肿瘤复发/进展同时发生,但对患者生存无显著影响。大多数患者(98%)通过肿瘤特异性治疗和抗癫痫药物的结合实现了癫痫发作的自由。癫痫作为原发性肿瘤的表现与老年GBM患者的生存无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation correlates with patient status, age, and tumor volume but not with survival in elderly glioblastoma patients: a retrospective bicentric analysis.

Assessment of the potential impact of epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation on survival in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Two academic neurosurgical centers retrospectively analyzed all GBM patients aged 65 years and older with de-novo tumors, who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2021. Epidemiological, histopathological, imaging and survival data were obtained from patients' electronic charts, and screened for the presence of epilepsy preoperatively and during follow-up. Patient status was assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), epilepsy was evaluated using the Engel classification. Patients were categorized in an epilepsy cohort (i.e. patients with epilepsy as primary GBM manifestation, and a reference cohort (i.e. patients with no initial epilepsy). This study analyzed 451 GBM patients (55% males); median age at tumor diagnosis was 73 years. The epilepsy cohort was younger (71.0 vs. 74.0 year; p = 0.001), had better KPS (80 vs. 70; p = 0.039), and had smaller tumors (127 vs. 221 cm3; p = 0.001) compared to the reference cohort. There were no differences with regard to neurosurgical treatment (i.e. resection vs. biopsy), tumor biomarkers, surgery-associated complications, and performed adjuvant treatment (all p > 0.05). We did not detect a significant difference in median survival between the epilepsy and reference cohorts (8 vs. 6 months; p = 0.21). New epilepsy during follow-up often coincided with tumor recurrence/progression, but also did not significantly affect survival. The majority of patients (98%) achieved seizure freedom by a combination of tumor-specific treatments and antiseizure medication. Epilepsy as primary tumor manifestation does not correlate with survival in elderly GBM patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信