日本类风湿性关节炎csDMARD-IR和bDMARD-IR患者的实际治疗持续性:一项大型索赔数据库研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Tsutomu Takeuchi, Craig Pfeifer, Yan Zhong, Yi Piao, Toshihiko Kaise, Mahiro Tani
{"title":"日本类风湿性关节炎csDMARD-IR和bDMARD-IR患者的实际治疗持续性:一项大型索赔数据库研究","authors":"Tsutomu Takeuchi, Craig Pfeifer, Yan Zhong, Yi Piao, Toshihiko Kaise, Mahiro Tani","doi":"10.1093/mr/roaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate treatment persistence for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), including filgotinib, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) and bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR), and to identify characteristics associated with treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2020-2023 health claims data from adults with RA who received ≥1 prescription for bDMARDs or JAKis during the study period and ≥1 prescription for csDMARDs over the previous 6 months. Persistence rates were estimated for the csDMARD-IR (patients naïve to bDMARDs/JAKis) and bDMARD-IR (patients switching to bDMARDs/JAKis from an initial bDMARD) cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7208 and 1581 patients were identified in the csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts, respectively. In the csDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 59%-70% for JAKis (67% for filgotinib) and 53%-69% for bDMARDs. In the bDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 57%-66% for JAKis (66% for filgotinib) and 19%-91% for bDMARDs. No clinical characteristics were consistently associated with the persistence of JAKi or bDMARD treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of persistence among patients taking JAKis, including filgotinib, were approximately 60% or higher in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"626-636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment persistence in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: A large claims database study.\",\"authors\":\"Tsutomu Takeuchi, Craig Pfeifer, Yan Zhong, Yi Piao, Toshihiko Kaise, Mahiro Tani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate treatment persistence for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), including filgotinib, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) and bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR), and to identify characteristics associated with treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2020-2023 health claims data from adults with RA who received ≥1 prescription for bDMARDs or JAKis during the study period and ≥1 prescription for csDMARDs over the previous 6 months. Persistence rates were estimated for the csDMARD-IR (patients naïve to bDMARDs/JAKis) and bDMARD-IR (patients switching to bDMARDs/JAKis from an initial bDMARD) cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7208 and 1581 patients were identified in the csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts, respectively. In the csDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 59%-70% for JAKis (67% for filgotinib) and 53%-69% for bDMARDs. In the bDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 57%-66% for JAKis (66% for filgotinib) and 19%-91% for bDMARDs. No clinical characteristics were consistently associated with the persistence of JAKi or bDMARD treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of persistence among patients taking JAKis, including filgotinib, were approximately 60% or higher in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"626-636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究日本类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者对传统合成dmard (csDMARD-IR)和bdmard (bDMARD-IR)反应不足(IR)的生物疾病改善抗风湿药物(bdmard)和Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKis)(包括非戈替尼)的治疗持续性,并确定与治疗中断相关的特征。方法:我们分析了2020-2023年的健康声明数据,这些数据来自于在研究期间接受≥1个bDMARDs或JAKis处方的成人RA患者,以及在过去6个月内接受≥1个csDMARDs处方的成人RA患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计csDMARD-IR(从csdmard切换到bDMARD或JAKis的患者naïve到bDMARD /JAKis)和bDMARD- ir(从初始bDMARD切换到bDMARD或JAKis的患者)队列的持续率。结果:总体而言,csDMARD-IR和bDMARD-IR队列分别确定了7208例和1581例患者。在csDMARD-IR队列中,JAKis的1年持续率为59%-70%(非戈替尼为67%),bDMARDs为53%-69%。在bDMARD-IR队列中,JAKis的1年持续率为57%-66%(非戈替尼为66%),bdmard的1年持续率为19%-91%。没有临床特征与JAKi或bDMARD治疗的持续性一致相关。结论:在csDMARD-IR和bDMARD-IR队列中,服用JAKis(包括非戈替尼)的患者的持续率约为60%或更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world treatment persistence in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: A large claims database study.

Objectives: To investigate treatment persistence for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), including filgotinib, in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) and bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR), and to identify characteristics associated with treatment discontinuation.

Methods: We analyzed 2020-2023 health claims data from adults with RA who received ≥1 prescription for bDMARDs or JAKis during the study period and ≥1 prescription for csDMARDs over the previous 6 months. Persistence rates were estimated for the csDMARD-IR (patients naïve to bDMARDs/JAKis) and bDMARD-IR (patients switching to bDMARDs/JAKis from an initial bDMARD) cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Overall, 7208 and 1581 patients were identified in the csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts, respectively. In the csDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 59%-70% for JAKis (67% for filgotinib) and 53%-69% for bDMARDs. In the bDMARD-IR cohort, 1-year persistence rates were 57%-66% for JAKis (66% for filgotinib) and 19%-91% for bDMARDs. No clinical characteristics were consistently associated with the persistence of JAKi or bDMARD treatment.

Conclusions: Rates of persistence among patients taking JAKis, including filgotinib, were approximately 60% or higher in csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信