利用膜接触器回收污泥消化液中氨作为柠檬酸铵和硫酸铵的试验研究。

IF 3.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ricardo Reyes Alva, Marius Mohr, Günter E M Tovar, Susanne Zibek
{"title":"利用膜接触器回收污泥消化液中氨作为柠檬酸铵和硫酸铵的试验研究。","authors":"Ricardo Reyes Alva, Marius Mohr, Günter E M Tovar, Susanne Zibek","doi":"10.3390/membranes15020062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Membrane contactors have proved to be effective for recovering ammonia from wastewater by absorbing it into a trapping solution. This study compares the performance of sulfuric acid and citric acid as trapping solutions in a pilot-scale plant for recovering ammonia from sludge digestion liquors using membrane contactors in a liquid-liquid configuration operating at pH 10 and a temperature of 37 °C and using ultrafiltration (UF) technology as pretreatment. The performance of the process using sulfuric acid at a lower pH (9.5) and temperature (30 °C) was also studied, as well as the advantage of including a CO<sub>2</sub>-stripping module in the process. The ammonia elimination efficiency was 88% and 86% when using sulfuric acid and citric acid, respectively. The nitrogen concentration of the produced ammonium sulfate and ammonium citrate reached 23.2 and 14.7 g NH<sub>3</sub>-N·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The ammonia elimination efficiency when using sulfuric acid decreased to 49% when decreasing the pH to 9.5 and to 85% when decreasing the temperature to 31 °C. UF technology was able to reduce the concentration of suspended solids by 90% and the chemical oxygen demand by 37%. However, the UF membranes for the pretreatment and the membrane contactors for ammonia recovery had to be constantly cleaned with acid due to scaling, which significantly increased maintenance efforts. The CO<sub>2</sub>-stripping module reduced the consumption of the caustic soda solution by 23% for increasing the pH level of the treated water. Finally, the specific energy consumption of the plant was 8 kWh·m<sup>-3</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18410,"journal":{"name":"Membranes","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering Ammonia as Ammonium Citrate and Ammonium Sulfate from Sludge Digestion Liquors Using Membrane Contactors in a Pilot Plant.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Reyes Alva, Marius Mohr, Günter E M Tovar, Susanne Zibek\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/membranes15020062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Membrane contactors have proved to be effective for recovering ammonia from wastewater by absorbing it into a trapping solution. This study compares the performance of sulfuric acid and citric acid as trapping solutions in a pilot-scale plant for recovering ammonia from sludge digestion liquors using membrane contactors in a liquid-liquid configuration operating at pH 10 and a temperature of 37 °C and using ultrafiltration (UF) technology as pretreatment. The performance of the process using sulfuric acid at a lower pH (9.5) and temperature (30 °C) was also studied, as well as the advantage of including a CO<sub>2</sub>-stripping module in the process. The ammonia elimination efficiency was 88% and 86% when using sulfuric acid and citric acid, respectively. The nitrogen concentration of the produced ammonium sulfate and ammonium citrate reached 23.2 and 14.7 g NH<sub>3</sub>-N·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The ammonia elimination efficiency when using sulfuric acid decreased to 49% when decreasing the pH to 9.5 and to 85% when decreasing the temperature to 31 °C. UF technology was able to reduce the concentration of suspended solids by 90% and the chemical oxygen demand by 37%. However, the UF membranes for the pretreatment and the membrane contactors for ammonia recovery had to be constantly cleaned with acid due to scaling, which significantly increased maintenance efforts. The CO<sub>2</sub>-stripping module reduced the consumption of the caustic soda solution by 23% for increasing the pH level of the treated water. Finally, the specific energy consumption of the plant was 8 kWh·m<sup>-3</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Membranes\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Membranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15020062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15020062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膜接触器已被证明是有效的回收氨从废水中吸收到一个捕获溶液。本研究比较了硫酸和柠檬酸作为捕集液在中试工厂的性能,在pH值为10、温度为37°C的液-液配置中使用膜接触器回收污泥消化液中的氨,并使用超滤(UF)技术作为预处理。还研究了在较低pH值(9.5)和温度(30°C)下使用硫酸的工艺性能,以及在该工艺中加入co2汽提模块的优点。硫酸和柠檬酸对氨的去除率分别为88%和86%。所得硫酸铵和柠檬酸铵的氮浓度分别达到23.2和14.7 g NH3-N·L-1。当pH值降至9.5时,使用硫酸的氨除率降至49%,当温度降至31℃时,氨除率降至85%。超滤技术可使悬浮物浓度降低90%,化学需氧量降低37%。然而,用于预处理的UF膜和用于氨回收的膜接触器由于结垢而必须经常用酸清洗,这大大增加了维护工作量。二氧化碳剥离模块通过提高处理水的pH值,将苛性钠溶液的消耗量减少了23%。最终,该装置的比能耗为8 kWh·m-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recovering Ammonia as Ammonium Citrate and Ammonium Sulfate from Sludge Digestion Liquors Using Membrane Contactors in a Pilot Plant.

Membrane contactors have proved to be effective for recovering ammonia from wastewater by absorbing it into a trapping solution. This study compares the performance of sulfuric acid and citric acid as trapping solutions in a pilot-scale plant for recovering ammonia from sludge digestion liquors using membrane contactors in a liquid-liquid configuration operating at pH 10 and a temperature of 37 °C and using ultrafiltration (UF) technology as pretreatment. The performance of the process using sulfuric acid at a lower pH (9.5) and temperature (30 °C) was also studied, as well as the advantage of including a CO2-stripping module in the process. The ammonia elimination efficiency was 88% and 86% when using sulfuric acid and citric acid, respectively. The nitrogen concentration of the produced ammonium sulfate and ammonium citrate reached 23.2 and 14.7 g NH3-N·L-1, respectively. The ammonia elimination efficiency when using sulfuric acid decreased to 49% when decreasing the pH to 9.5 and to 85% when decreasing the temperature to 31 °C. UF technology was able to reduce the concentration of suspended solids by 90% and the chemical oxygen demand by 37%. However, the UF membranes for the pretreatment and the membrane contactors for ammonia recovery had to be constantly cleaned with acid due to scaling, which significantly increased maintenance efforts. The CO2-stripping module reduced the consumption of the caustic soda solution by 23% for increasing the pH level of the treated water. Finally, the specific energy consumption of the plant was 8 kWh·m-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Membranes
Membranes Chemical Engineering-Filtration and Separation
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1071
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of separation science and technology. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信