采用椎间盘切除术治疗颈椎和腰椎间盘突出症,哪种预后效果更好?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S500287
Rongyi Zhang, Shi Chen, Liuhu Han, Bingbing Xu, Yuyu Guo, Likui Wang
{"title":"采用椎间盘切除术治疗颈椎和腰椎间盘突出症,哪种预后效果更好?","authors":"Rongyi Zhang, Shi Chen, Liuhu Han, Bingbing Xu, Yuyu Guo, Likui Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S500287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coblation nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure developed for the treatment of symptomatic disc herniation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 118 cases of cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs treated with coblation nucleoplasty. The clinical results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and efficacy. Complications and the re-surgery rate were also evaluated. The procedure was carried out under CT guidance, and the patients were followed up for 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years postoperative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 5-year follow-up, the VAS score in the cervical and lumbar groups significantly decreased from 6.20 to 2.43 and 6.11 to 3.29, respectively. While MacNab scores were indistinguishable at the 6-month follow-up, they differed significantly between the cervical (58.2%) and lumbar (34.9%) groups at the 5-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, 6 patients in the cervical group and 11 in the lumbar group underwent conventional operation. The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty at the 5-year follow-up was higher in cervical group (81.82%) compared with lumbar group (61.90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that coblation nucleoplasty is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with cervical and lumbar disc herniation. The long-term benefits of this procedure were more pronounced in patients with cervical disc herniation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400089145).</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"817-826"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Kind of Prognosis is Better in the Treatment of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation with Coblation Nucleoplasty?\",\"authors\":\"Rongyi Zhang, Shi Chen, Liuhu Han, Bingbing Xu, Yuyu Guo, Likui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S500287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coblation nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure developed for the treatment of symptomatic disc herniation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 118 cases of cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs treated with coblation nucleoplasty. The clinical results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and efficacy. Complications and the re-surgery rate were also evaluated. The procedure was carried out under CT guidance, and the patients were followed up for 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years postoperative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 5-year follow-up, the VAS score in the cervical and lumbar groups significantly decreased from 6.20 to 2.43 and 6.11 to 3.29, respectively. While MacNab scores were indistinguishable at the 6-month follow-up, they differed significantly between the cervical (58.2%) and lumbar (34.9%) groups at the 5-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, 6 patients in the cervical group and 11 in the lumbar group underwent conventional operation. The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty at the 5-year follow-up was higher in cervical group (81.82%) compared with lumbar group (61.90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that coblation nucleoplasty is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with cervical and lumbar disc herniation. The long-term benefits of this procedure were more pronounced in patients with cervical disc herniation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400089145).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"817-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S500287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S500287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:消融核成形术是一种用于治疗症状性椎间盘突出的微创手术。方法:对118例颈、腰椎间盘行核内固定成形术的患者进行评价。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、改良MacNab标准和疗效进行评估。观察并发症及再手术率。手术在CT引导下进行,术后随访1天、1个月、6个月、5年。结果:5年随访时,颈、腰椎组VAS评分分别由6.20降至2.43、6.11降至3.29,差异有统计学意义。虽然在6个月的随访中MacNab评分没有差别,但在5年随访中,颈椎组(58.2%)和腰椎组(34.9%)的评分差异显著。5年随访中,颈组6例,腰椎组11例均行常规手术。5年随访时,颈椎组(81.82%)比腰椎组(61.90%)有效率。结论:本研究结果提示消融核成形术是治疗颈腰椎间盘突出症的一种安全有效的方法。对于颈椎间盘突出的患者,这种手术的长期益处更为明显。临床试验注册:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400089145)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Kind of Prognosis is Better in the Treatment of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation with Coblation Nucleoplasty?

Introduction: Coblation nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure developed for the treatment of symptomatic disc herniation.

Methods: We evaluated 118 cases of cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs treated with coblation nucleoplasty. The clinical results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and efficacy. Complications and the re-surgery rate were also evaluated. The procedure was carried out under CT guidance, and the patients were followed up for 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years postoperative.

Results: At the 5-year follow-up, the VAS score in the cervical and lumbar groups significantly decreased from 6.20 to 2.43 and 6.11 to 3.29, respectively. While MacNab scores were indistinguishable at the 6-month follow-up, they differed significantly between the cervical (58.2%) and lumbar (34.9%) groups at the 5-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, 6 patients in the cervical group and 11 in the lumbar group underwent conventional operation. The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty at the 5-year follow-up was higher in cervical group (81.82%) compared with lumbar group (61.90%).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that coblation nucleoplasty is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with cervical and lumbar disc herniation. The long-term benefits of this procedure were more pronounced in patients with cervical disc herniation.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400089145).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信