成人患者微型辅助快速腭扩张术(MARPE)与手术辅助快速腭扩张术(SARPE)的副作用比较:一项范围综述。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nicolò Sicca, Giulia Benedetti, Agnese Nieri, Sara Vitale, Gaia Lopponi, Silvia Mura, Alessio Verdecchia, Enrico Spinas
{"title":"成人患者微型辅助快速腭扩张术(MARPE)与手术辅助快速腭扩张术(SARPE)的副作用比较:一项范围综述。","authors":"Nicolò Sicca, Giulia Benedetti, Agnese Nieri, Sara Vitale, Gaia Lopponi, Silvia Mura, Alessio Verdecchia, Enrico Spinas","doi":"10.3390/dj13020047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study is to investigate the side effects of two techniques of rapid maxillary expansion-Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)-in adult patients, to guide the selection of the most cost-effective clinical treatment plan. <b>Methods</b>: The review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were defined based on the study objectives. The research team formulated a PICO question to identify relevant studies in the literature. Five databases were queried: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Additionally, a manual search was conducted. <b>Results</b>: The computer-assisted search identified 746 articles, of which only 26 fully met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Among the included studies, 11 were retrospective, 12 were prospective, and 3 were randomized clinical trials. SARPE was evaluated in 21 studies, MARPE in 4 studies, and 1 article reported complications associated with both techniques. The side effects described in the studies were synthesized and categorized into five groups: expansion failure, asymmetric expansion, dentoalveolar issues, surgical complications, and appliance-related problems. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results indicate that both techniques involve risks. The most reported adverse effects were dentoalveolar and surgical in nature. Dentoalveolar side effects, such as dental tipping, were predominantly associated with the MARPE technique, while surgical complications were more commonly observed with the SARPE technique. Patient age is crucial for treatment choice as well as proper design and planning of the expansion device. Consequently, careful patient selection and treatment planning are essential to minimize the side effects of maxillary expansion in adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Side Effects Between Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) and Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) in Adult Patients: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò Sicca, Giulia Benedetti, Agnese Nieri, Sara Vitale, Gaia Lopponi, Silvia Mura, Alessio Verdecchia, Enrico Spinas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13020047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study is to investigate the side effects of two techniques of rapid maxillary expansion-Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)-in adult patients, to guide the selection of the most cost-effective clinical treatment plan. <b>Methods</b>: The review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were defined based on the study objectives. The research team formulated a PICO question to identify relevant studies in the literature. Five databases were queried: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Additionally, a manual search was conducted. <b>Results</b>: The computer-assisted search identified 746 articles, of which only 26 fully met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Among the included studies, 11 were retrospective, 12 were prospective, and 3 were randomized clinical trials. SARPE was evaluated in 21 studies, MARPE in 4 studies, and 1 article reported complications associated with both techniques. The side effects described in the studies were synthesized and categorized into five groups: expansion failure, asymmetric expansion, dentoalveolar issues, surgical complications, and appliance-related problems. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results indicate that both techniques involve risks. The most reported adverse effects were dentoalveolar and surgical in nature. Dentoalveolar side effects, such as dental tipping, were predominantly associated with the MARPE technique, while surgical complications were more commonly observed with the SARPE technique. Patient age is crucial for treatment choice as well as proper design and planning of the expansion device. Consequently, careful patient selection and treatment planning are essential to minimize the side effects of maxillary expansion in adult patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在探讨两种快速上颌扩张技术——外科辅助快速腭扩张(SARPE)和微型辅助快速腭扩张(MARPE)在成人患者中的副作用,以指导选择最具成本效益的临床治疗方案。方法:根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)指南制定评价方案。根据研究目标确定入选标准。研究小组制定了一个PICO问题来识别文献中的相关研究。查询了5个数据库:MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase。此外,还进行了人工搜索。结果:计算机辅助检索发现746篇文章,其中只有26篇完全符合纳入标准,被纳入范围评价。纳入的研究中,11项为回顾性研究,12项为前瞻性研究,3项为随机临床试验。21项研究评估了SARPE, 4项研究评估了MARPE, 1篇文章报道了两种技术相关的并发症。研究中描述的副作用被综合并分为五组:扩张失败、不对称扩张、牙槽问题、手术并发症和器械相关问题。结论:结果表明两种技术都存在风险。报道最多的不良反应是牙槽和手术性质。牙槽的副作用,如牙齿倾斜,主要与MARPE技术相关,而SARPE技术更常见的是手术并发症。患者的年龄是治疗选择的关键,也是适当设计和规划扩张装置的关键。因此,谨慎的患者选择和治疗计划是必要的,以尽量减少上颌扩张的副作用,在成人患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Side Effects Between Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) and Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) in Adult Patients: A Scoping Review.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the side effects of two techniques of rapid maxillary expansion-Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) and Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)-in adult patients, to guide the selection of the most cost-effective clinical treatment plan. Methods: The review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were defined based on the study objectives. The research team formulated a PICO question to identify relevant studies in the literature. Five databases were queried: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Additionally, a manual search was conducted. Results: The computer-assisted search identified 746 articles, of which only 26 fully met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Among the included studies, 11 were retrospective, 12 were prospective, and 3 were randomized clinical trials. SARPE was evaluated in 21 studies, MARPE in 4 studies, and 1 article reported complications associated with both techniques. The side effects described in the studies were synthesized and categorized into five groups: expansion failure, asymmetric expansion, dentoalveolar issues, surgical complications, and appliance-related problems. Conclusions: The results indicate that both techniques involve risks. The most reported adverse effects were dentoalveolar and surgical in nature. Dentoalveolar side effects, such as dental tipping, were predominantly associated with the MARPE technique, while surgical complications were more commonly observed with the SARPE technique. Patient age is crucial for treatment choice as well as proper design and planning of the expansion device. Consequently, careful patient selection and treatment planning are essential to minimize the side effects of maxillary expansion in adult patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信