非癌基因成瘾可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的围手术期化疗免疫治疗:意大利专家小组会议。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Filippo de Marinis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Ilaria Attili, Laura Bonanno, Emilio Bria, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Margaritora, Francesca Mazzoni, Edoardo Mercadante, Alessandro Morabito, Francesco Petrella, Federico Rea, Rosario Salvi, Piergiorgio Solli, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Luca Voltolini, Cesare Gridelli
{"title":"非癌基因成瘾可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的围手术期化疗免疫治疗:意大利专家小组会议。","authors":"Filippo de Marinis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Ilaria Attili, Laura Bonanno, Emilio Bria, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Margaritora, Francesca Mazzoni, Edoardo Mercadante, Alessandro Morabito, Francesco Petrella, Federico Rea, Rosario Salvi, Piergiorgio Solli, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Luca Voltolini, Cesare Gridelli","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32020110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients' selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, panelists found agreement on seven statements. With regard to tissue and biomarker analysis, the role of increasing PD-L1 expression in predicting IO efficacy was recognized, whereas ctDNA and pCR were mainly attributed a prognostic role, in the absence of dedicated studies. The panelists acknowledged direct relationship between the benefit of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy approaches and the local burden of disease/mediastinal node involvement, supporting the inclusion of these factors, together with PD-L1, in selecting upfront surgery or induction treatment. The panelists agreed that the current literature data do not answer the issue of assessing the role of the adjuvant phase within a perioperative treatment strategy. Surgical considerations on the role of pneumonectomy and other approaches were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience highlights the importance of a synergistic approach between oncologists and surgeons to leverage the unmet needs in translating results of IO-perioperative clinical trials into clinical practice in patients with resectable NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Chemo-Immunotherapy in Non-Oncogene-Addicted Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Italian Expert Panel Meeting.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo de Marinis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Ilaria Attili, Laura Bonanno, Emilio Bria, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Margaritora, Francesca Mazzoni, Edoardo Mercadante, Alessandro Morabito, Francesco Petrella, Federico Rea, Rosario Salvi, Piergiorgio Solli, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Luca Voltolini, Cesare Gridelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32020110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients' selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, panelists found agreement on seven statements. With regard to tissue and biomarker analysis, the role of increasing PD-L1 expression in predicting IO efficacy was recognized, whereas ctDNA and pCR were mainly attributed a prognostic role, in the absence of dedicated studies. The panelists acknowledged direct relationship between the benefit of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy approaches and the local burden of disease/mediastinal node involvement, supporting the inclusion of these factors, together with PD-L1, in selecting upfront surgery or induction treatment. The panelists agreed that the current literature data do not answer the issue of assessing the role of the adjuvant phase within a perioperative treatment strategy. Surgical considerations on the role of pneumonectomy and other approaches were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience highlights the importance of a synergistic approach between oncologists and surgeons to leverage the unmet needs in translating results of IO-perioperative clinical trials into clinical practice in patients with resectable NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫治疗(IO)为基础的策略已被证明可以显著延长非癌基因成瘾非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)围手术期的生存期。在临床实践中采用这种策略取决于不同监管部门的批准以及肿瘤内科医生和胸外科医生对患者选择的一致意见。方法:由意大利胸肿瘤协会(AIOT)虚拟召开内科肿瘤学家和胸外科医生专家小组会议,讨论围手术期化疗免疫治疗的关键临床试验结果,并就该主题的开放性问题达成一致意见,根据最初提出的讨论问题制定具体声明。结果:总体而言,小组成员在7项陈述上达成一致。在组织和生物标志物分析方面,PD-L1表达的增加在预测IO疗效中的作用得到了认可,而ctDNA和pCR主要被认为是预后作用,缺乏专门的研究。小组成员承认新辅助化疗免疫治疗方法的益处与疾病/纵隔淋巴结累及的局部负担之间存在直接关系,支持在选择前期手术或诱导治疗时将这些因素与PD-L1一起纳入。小组成员一致认为,目前的文献数据并不能回答评估辅助期在围手术期治疗策略中的作用的问题。我们还讨论了肺切除术和其他入路在手术中的作用。结论:这一经验强调了肿瘤学家和外科医生之间协同方法的重要性,以利用未满足的需求,将io围手术期临床试验的结果转化为可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative Chemo-Immunotherapy in Non-Oncogene-Addicted Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Italian Expert Panel Meeting.

Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based strategies have been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival in the perioperative setting of non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adoption of such strategies in clinical practice depends on heterogeneous regulatory approvals and on the agreement between medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons on patients' selection.

Methods: An Expert Panel Meeting of medical oncologists and thoracic surgeons was held virtually by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT) to discuss results of pivotal clinical trials with perioperative chemo-immunotherapy and reach agreement on open issues for the topic, formulating specific statements based on initially proposed discussion questions.

Results: Overall, panelists found agreement on seven statements. With regard to tissue and biomarker analysis, the role of increasing PD-L1 expression in predicting IO efficacy was recognized, whereas ctDNA and pCR were mainly attributed a prognostic role, in the absence of dedicated studies. The panelists acknowledged direct relationship between the benefit of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy approaches and the local burden of disease/mediastinal node involvement, supporting the inclusion of these factors, together with PD-L1, in selecting upfront surgery or induction treatment. The panelists agreed that the current literature data do not answer the issue of assessing the role of the adjuvant phase within a perioperative treatment strategy. Surgical considerations on the role of pneumonectomy and other approaches were also discussed.

Conclusions: This experience highlights the importance of a synergistic approach between oncologists and surgeons to leverage the unmet needs in translating results of IO-perioperative clinical trials into clinical practice in patients with resectable NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信