{"title":"肝动脉输注化疗联合Lenvatinib和程序性死亡(PD)-1抑制剂治疗不可切除肝内胆管癌的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Yingxiao Cai, Wu Wen, Yangshuo Xia, Renhua Wan","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32020087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. <b>Results:</b> This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, <i>p</i> = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.104). Based on OS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Programmed Death (PD)-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yingxiao Cai, Wu Wen, Yangshuo Xia, Renhua Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32020087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. <b>Results:</b> This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, <i>p</i> = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.104). Based on OS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020087\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然全身化疗(SC)是治疗不可切除肝内胆管癌(ICC)的主要方法,但其疗效有限,且会引起严重的全身副作用。本研究的重点是评估肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)联合lenvatinib +程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)抑制剂(HLP)与SC联合lenvatinib + PD-1抑制剂(SCLP)治疗不可切除ICC的有效性和安全性。方法:我们分析了本中心于2021年3月至2023年12月期间首次诊断为不可切除ICC的患者,根据治疗方案将其分为HLP组和SCLP组。该研究评估并比较了两个治疗组的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、肿瘤反应和安全性结果。结果:本研究共纳入53名受试者;HLP组25例,SCLP组28例。两组表现出非常匹配的基线特征。与SCLP组相比,HLP组的中位OS延长(12.8个月对11.0个月,p = 0.310),中位PFS延长(8.8个月对6.4个月,p = 0.043)。HLP组客观有效率(ORR) (52% vs. 25%, p = 0.043)和疾病控制率(DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.104)较高。基于OS (p = 0.019)和PFS (p = 0.032)的结果,那些没有肝外转移的患者似乎从HLP方案中比从SCLP方案中获益更显著。HLP组的3-4级不良事件(ae)少于SCLP组。结论:对于不可切除的ICC, HLP方案是一种有效且安全的策略,可能更适合无肝外转移的患者。
The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Programmed Death (PD)-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.
Objectives: Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. Methods: We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. Results: This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, p = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.104). Based on OS (p = 0.019) and PFS (p = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. Conclusions: The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.