电磁导航支气管镜下针吸钳活检对周围性肺病变的诊断率和协同影响(confidence - enb):一项随机对照试验。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015
Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee
{"title":"电磁导航支气管镜下针吸钳活检对周围性肺病变的诊断率和协同影响(confidence - enb):一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63 of 142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73 of 142) for needle aspiration (P = .221 vs forceps), and 66.9% (95 of 142) for the combination (P < .001 vs forceps alone, P < .001 vs needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70 of 120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57 of 120) for forceps biopsy (P = .074). The combination of the 2 modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86 of 120) compared with either individual modality (P < .001 vs forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5 of 142) of patients, and 1.4% (2 of 142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared with each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05110131; URL: www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy With Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63 of 142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73 of 142) for needle aspiration (P = .221 vs forceps), and 66.9% (95 of 142) for the combination (P < .001 vs forceps alone, P < .001 vs needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70 of 120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57 of 120) for forceps biopsy (P = .074). The combination of the 2 modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86 of 120) compared with either individual modality (P < .001 vs forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5 of 142) of patients, and 1.4% (2 of 142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared with each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05110131; URL: www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电磁导航支气管镜(ENB)是一种先进的成像引导技术,用于诊断周围肺病变。然而,选择活检设备的最佳策略仍不清楚。研究问题:与单独使用单一设备相比,针吸钳活检是否能提高诊断率?研究设计和方法:我们进行了一项随机交叉研究,在中度镇静下进行ENB。该试验招募了需要活检的周围肺病变患者,这些患者符合选择性ENB的条件。enb引导下的针抽吸和钳活检按随机顺序依次进行。主要结果是诊断率,定义为活检提供了能够告知患者管理的特定诊断的患者的百分比。评估了每一种活检方式单独和联合的诊断率。结果:在2021年12月1日至2023年11月13日期间,142名参与者入组并接受了研究程序。140名参与者获得了完整的随访数据。产钳活检的诊断率为44.4%(63/142),针吸活检的诊断率为51.4% (73/142)(p=0.221 vs.产钳),联合使用的诊断率为66.9%(95/142)(解释:在中度镇静下进行ENB时,与单独使用两种方式相比,针吸和产钳活检的联合使用显著提高了恶性肿瘤的诊断率和敏感性,具有良好的安全性。这些结果表明,使用针和钳的多模式方法是ENB的有效诊断策略。临床试验注册:NCT05110131。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy With Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.

Research question: Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?

Study design and methods: We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.

Results: Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63 of 142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73 of 142) for needle aspiration (P = .221 vs forceps), and 66.9% (95 of 142) for the combination (P < .001 vs forceps alone, P < .001 vs needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70 of 120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57 of 120) for forceps biopsy (P = .074). The combination of the 2 modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86 of 120) compared with either individual modality (P < .001 vs forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5 of 142) of patients, and 1.4% (2 of 142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.

Interpretation: When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared with each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05110131; URL: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信