不同粘接方法对 CAD/CAM 树脂块微拉伸粘接强度的影响

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alexandra Vinagre, Carla Delgado, Gabriela Almeida, Ana Messias, João Carlos Ramos
{"title":"不同粘接方法对 CAD/CAM 树脂块微拉伸粘接强度的影响","authors":"Alexandra Vinagre, Carla Delgado, Gabriela Almeida, Ana Messias, João Carlos Ramos","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10020123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread implementation of new CAD/CAM materials has led to the necessity of establishing an adequate luting protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the film thickness of different luting methods on CAD/CAM resin blocks. Five Brilliant Crios CAD/CAM blocks (Coltene/Whaledent) were sequentially sectioned into two halves, air abraded with 50 µm aluminum oxide, and luted according to five different cementation protocols: Brilliant EverGlow (BEG), Brilliant EverGlow with ultrasound application (BEG-US), preheated Brilliant EverGlow (BEG-H), Brilliant EverGlow Flow (BEGF), and Duo Cem<sup>®</sup> Trans (DC). Subsequently, the blocks were sectioned to obtain rods, which were then submitted to a microtensile bond strength test (n = 20). The surfaces were examined with optical microscopy to determine the failure mode and the bonding interface was assessed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Bond strength values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The bond strength values varied with the different cementation protocols (<i>p</i> < 0.001): BEG (45.48 ± 18.14 MPa), BEG-US (42.15 ± 14.90 MPa), BEG-H (41.23 ± 15.15 MPa), BEGF (58.38 ± 15.65 MPa), and DC (81.07 ± 8.75 MPa). Regarding bond strength, DC presented significantly higher values than all other experimental groups (<i>p</i> < 0.050), whereas all luting methods using BEG presented similar values (<i>p</i> = 0.894). Adhesive failures were the predominant type. On SEM evaluation, all the luting materials presented a tight and homogeneous cement-block interface with variable film thicknesses. In conclusion, among the cementation protocols, the resin cement (DC) rendered the highest bond strength values. SEM analysis revealed that the lowest film thickness was associated with the flowable composite (BEGF).</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Luting Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Vinagre, Carla Delgado, Gabriela Almeida, Ana Messias, João Carlos Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomimetics10020123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The widespread implementation of new CAD/CAM materials has led to the necessity of establishing an adequate luting protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the film thickness of different luting methods on CAD/CAM resin blocks. Five Brilliant Crios CAD/CAM blocks (Coltene/Whaledent) were sequentially sectioned into two halves, air abraded with 50 µm aluminum oxide, and luted according to five different cementation protocols: Brilliant EverGlow (BEG), Brilliant EverGlow with ultrasound application (BEG-US), preheated Brilliant EverGlow (BEG-H), Brilliant EverGlow Flow (BEGF), and Duo Cem<sup>®</sup> Trans (DC). Subsequently, the blocks were sectioned to obtain rods, which were then submitted to a microtensile bond strength test (n = 20). The surfaces were examined with optical microscopy to determine the failure mode and the bonding interface was assessed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Bond strength values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The bond strength values varied with the different cementation protocols (<i>p</i> < 0.001): BEG (45.48 ± 18.14 MPa), BEG-US (42.15 ± 14.90 MPa), BEG-H (41.23 ± 15.15 MPa), BEGF (58.38 ± 15.65 MPa), and DC (81.07 ± 8.75 MPa). Regarding bond strength, DC presented significantly higher values than all other experimental groups (<i>p</i> < 0.050), whereas all luting methods using BEG presented similar values (<i>p</i> = 0.894). Adhesive failures were the predominant type. On SEM evaluation, all the luting materials presented a tight and homogeneous cement-block interface with variable film thicknesses. In conclusion, among the cementation protocols, the resin cement (DC) rendered the highest bond strength values. SEM analysis revealed that the lowest film thickness was associated with the flowable composite (BEGF).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomimetics\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomimetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新的CAD/CAM材料的广泛实施导致了建立一个适当的布线协议的必要性。本研究的目的是评价不同粘接方法在CAD/CAM树脂块上的微拉伸结合强度(μTBS)和膜厚。五个Brilliant Crios CAD/CAM块(Coltene/Whaledent)依次切成两半,用50µm氧化铝进行空气研磨,并根据五种不同的胶结方案进行粘合:Brilliant EverGlow (BEG), Brilliant EverGlow带超声应用(BEG- us),预热Brilliant EverGlow (begh), Brilliant EverGlow Flow (BEGF)和Duo Cem®Trans (DC)。随后,对块进行切片以获得棒,然后进行微拉伸粘结强度测试(n = 20)。用光学显微镜检查表面以确定失效模式,并用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析评估键合界面。结合强度值采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α = 0.05)。不同胶凝方式的胶凝强度值分别为BEG(45.48±18.14 MPa)、BEGF - us(42.15±14.90 MPa)、BEGF - h(41.23±15.15 MPa)、BEGF(58.38±15.65 MPa)和DC(81.07±8.75 MPa),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。在键合强度方面,DC组显著高于其他所有实验组(p < 0.050),而使用BEG的所有方法的键合强度相近(p = 0.894)。粘接失效是主要类型。SEM分析结果表明,所有材料均表现为致密均匀的水泥块界面,膜厚变化。综上所述,在胶结方案中,树脂水泥(DC)具有最高的粘结强度值。SEM分析表明,最低的膜厚度与可流动复合材料(BEGF)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Luting Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks.

The widespread implementation of new CAD/CAM materials has led to the necessity of establishing an adequate luting protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the film thickness of different luting methods on CAD/CAM resin blocks. Five Brilliant Crios CAD/CAM blocks (Coltene/Whaledent) were sequentially sectioned into two halves, air abraded with 50 µm aluminum oxide, and luted according to five different cementation protocols: Brilliant EverGlow (BEG), Brilliant EverGlow with ultrasound application (BEG-US), preheated Brilliant EverGlow (BEG-H), Brilliant EverGlow Flow (BEGF), and Duo Cem® Trans (DC). Subsequently, the blocks were sectioned to obtain rods, which were then submitted to a microtensile bond strength test (n = 20). The surfaces were examined with optical microscopy to determine the failure mode and the bonding interface was assessed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Bond strength values were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (α = 0.05). The bond strength values varied with the different cementation protocols (p < 0.001): BEG (45.48 ± 18.14 MPa), BEG-US (42.15 ± 14.90 MPa), BEG-H (41.23 ± 15.15 MPa), BEGF (58.38 ± 15.65 MPa), and DC (81.07 ± 8.75 MPa). Regarding bond strength, DC presented significantly higher values than all other experimental groups (p < 0.050), whereas all luting methods using BEG presented similar values (p = 0.894). Adhesive failures were the predominant type. On SEM evaluation, all the luting materials presented a tight and homogeneous cement-block interface with variable film thicknesses. In conclusion, among the cementation protocols, the resin cement (DC) rendered the highest bond strength values. SEM analysis revealed that the lowest film thickness was associated with the flowable composite (BEGF).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信