环境健康和社会财富预测城市食肉动物的运动模式

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/ele.70088
Christine E. Wilkinson, Niamh Quinn, Curtis Eng, Christopher J. Schell
{"title":"环境健康和社会财富预测城市食肉动物的运动模式","authors":"Christine E. Wilkinson,&nbsp;Niamh Quinn,&nbsp;Curtis Eng,&nbsp;Christopher J. Schell","doi":"10.1111/ele.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How societal, ecological and infrastructural attributes interact to influence wildlife movement is uncertain. We explored whether neighbourhood socioeconomic status and environmental quality were associated with coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>) movement patterns in Los Angeles, California and assessed the performance of integrated social–ecological movement models. We found that coyotes living in more anthropogenically burdened regions (i.e. higher pollution, denser development, etc.) had larger home ranges and showed greater daily displacement and mean step length than coyotes in less burdened regions. Coyotes experiencing differing levels of anthropogenic burdens demonstrated divergent selection for vegetation, pollution, road densities and other habitat conditions. Further, movement models that included societal covariates performed better than models that only assessed ecological features and linear infrastructure. This study provides a unique social–ecological lens examining the anthropogenic drivers of urban wildlife movement, which should be applicable to urban planners and conservationists when building more equitable, healthy and wildlife-friendly cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Health and Societal Wealth Predict Movement Patterns of an Urban Carnivore\",\"authors\":\"Christine E. Wilkinson,&nbsp;Niamh Quinn,&nbsp;Curtis Eng,&nbsp;Christopher J. Schell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How societal, ecological and infrastructural attributes interact to influence wildlife movement is uncertain. We explored whether neighbourhood socioeconomic status and environmental quality were associated with coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>) movement patterns in Los Angeles, California and assessed the performance of integrated social–ecological movement models. We found that coyotes living in more anthropogenically burdened regions (i.e. higher pollution, denser development, etc.) had larger home ranges and showed greater daily displacement and mean step length than coyotes in less burdened regions. Coyotes experiencing differing levels of anthropogenic burdens demonstrated divergent selection for vegetation, pollution, road densities and other habitat conditions. Further, movement models that included societal covariates performed better than models that only assessed ecological features and linear infrastructure. This study provides a unique social–ecological lens examining the anthropogenic drivers of urban wildlife movement, which should be applicable to urban planners and conservationists when building more equitable, healthy and wildlife-friendly cities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70088\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会、生态和基础设施属性如何相互作用影响野生动物运动尚不确定。我们探讨了加州洛杉矶的社区社会经济地位和环境质量是否与土狼(Canis latrans)的运动模式有关,并评估了综合社会生态运动模型的表现。研究发现,与人类活动负担较轻的地区相比,生活在污染较高、发展较密集等地区的土狼有更大的活动范围、更大的日位移和平均步长。经历不同程度人为负担的土狼表现出对植被、污染、道路密度和其他栖息地条件的不同选择。此外,包含社会协变量的运动模型比只评估生态特征和线性基础设施的模型表现得更好。这项研究提供了一个独特的社会生态视角,审视了城市野生动物运动的人为驱动因素,这应该适用于城市规划者和保护主义者在建设更公平、健康和野生动物友好型城市时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental Health and Societal Wealth Predict Movement Patterns of an Urban Carnivore

Environmental Health and Societal Wealth Predict Movement Patterns of an Urban Carnivore

How societal, ecological and infrastructural attributes interact to influence wildlife movement is uncertain. We explored whether neighbourhood socioeconomic status and environmental quality were associated with coyote (Canis latrans) movement patterns in Los Angeles, California and assessed the performance of integrated social–ecological movement models. We found that coyotes living in more anthropogenically burdened regions (i.e. higher pollution, denser development, etc.) had larger home ranges and showed greater daily displacement and mean step length than coyotes in less burdened regions. Coyotes experiencing differing levels of anthropogenic burdens demonstrated divergent selection for vegetation, pollution, road densities and other habitat conditions. Further, movement models that included societal covariates performed better than models that only assessed ecological features and linear infrastructure. This study provides a unique social–ecological lens examining the anthropogenic drivers of urban wildlife movement, which should be applicable to urban planners and conservationists when building more equitable, healthy and wildlife-friendly cities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信