强化地热系统对加州能源转型的价值

IF 5 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Mohammad J. Aljubran, Dimitri M. Saad, Mo Sodwatana, Adam R. Brandt and Roland N. Horne
{"title":"强化地热系统对加州能源转型的价值","authors":"Mohammad J. Aljubran, Dimitri M. Saad, Mo Sodwatana, Adam R. Brandt and Roland N. Horne","doi":"10.1039/D4SE01520G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) offer a promising solution to decarbonizing electricity grids by providing clean firm power. We use the BRIDGES gas-electric capacity expansion model – a multi-sector energy model that optimizes energy system investment, retirements, and hourly dispatch over multiple time horizons – to explore the techno-economic impacts of integrating EGS into California's electricity and gas end-use sectors. This least-cost model co-optimizes for system expansion to meet electricity and heating demands, subject to gradually decreasing emission targets to reach a net-zero economy in 2045. We evaluated multiple EGS-focused scenarios by varying drilling depth, seismic exclusion zones, and dispatch flexibility. This allowed us to determine the influence of these factors on system capacity, costs, and emission reductions. Results showed that allowing drilling depths up to 7 km yielded up to 82 GW of EGS capacity by 2045, reducing the total system capacity requirement by 40% and system costs by 8.6% compared to cases without EGS. Flexible EGS dispatch further decreased system costs by 12.3%, although it accelerated reservoir depletion in the long term. EGS also reduced reliance on power-to-gas systems and supported electrification of heating, decreasing the total power-to-gas capacity by 50% compared to cases without EGS. This study demonstrated that EGS could be a critical component in achieving California's 2045 net-zero emissions target, offering significant cost reductions and enhanced system reliability across both the electricity and gas sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":104,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","volume":" 5","pages":" 1317-1337"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of enhanced geothermal systems for the energy transition in California\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad J. Aljubran, Dimitri M. Saad, Mo Sodwatana, Adam R. Brandt and Roland N. Horne\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4SE01520G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) offer a promising solution to decarbonizing electricity grids by providing clean firm power. We use the BRIDGES gas-electric capacity expansion model – a multi-sector energy model that optimizes energy system investment, retirements, and hourly dispatch over multiple time horizons – to explore the techno-economic impacts of integrating EGS into California's electricity and gas end-use sectors. This least-cost model co-optimizes for system expansion to meet electricity and heating demands, subject to gradually decreasing emission targets to reach a net-zero economy in 2045. We evaluated multiple EGS-focused scenarios by varying drilling depth, seismic exclusion zones, and dispatch flexibility. This allowed us to determine the influence of these factors on system capacity, costs, and emission reductions. Results showed that allowing drilling depths up to 7 km yielded up to 82 GW of EGS capacity by 2045, reducing the total system capacity requirement by 40% and system costs by 8.6% compared to cases without EGS. Flexible EGS dispatch further decreased system costs by 12.3%, although it accelerated reservoir depletion in the long term. EGS also reduced reliance on power-to-gas systems and supported electrification of heating, decreasing the total power-to-gas capacity by 50% compared to cases without EGS. This study demonstrated that EGS could be a critical component in achieving California's 2045 net-zero emissions target, offering significant cost reductions and enhanced system reliability across both the electricity and gas sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\" 1317-1337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se01520g\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se01520g","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增强型地热系统(EGS)通过提供清洁的电力为电网脱碳提供了一个很有前途的解决方案。我们使用BRIDGES气电产能扩张模型——一个多部门能源模型,优化能源系统投资、退役和在多个时间范围内的小时调度——来探索将EGS整合到加州电力和天然气终端使用部门的技术经济影响。这一成本最低的模式对系统扩展进行了协同优化,以满足电力和供暖需求,并逐步降低排放目标,到2045年实现净零经济。通过不同的钻井深度、地震隔离区和调度灵活性,我们评估了多种以egs为重点的方案。这使我们能够确定这些因素对系统容量、成本和减排的影响。结果表明,到2045年,允许钻探深度达到7公里的EGS容量可达82吉瓦,与不使用EGS的情况相比,总系统容量需求降低了40%,系统成本降低了8.6%。灵活的EGS调度进一步降低了12.3%的系统成本,尽管从长远来看它会加速油藏枯竭。EGS还减少了对电转气系统的依赖,并支持供暖电气化,与没有EGS的情况相比,总电转气容量降低了50%。这项研究表明,EGS可以成为实现加州2045年净零排放目标的关键组成部分,为电力和天然气行业提供显著的成本降低和提高系统可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The value of enhanced geothermal systems for the energy transition in California

The value of enhanced geothermal systems for the energy transition in California

Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) offer a promising solution to decarbonizing electricity grids by providing clean firm power. We use the BRIDGES gas-electric capacity expansion model – a multi-sector energy model that optimizes energy system investment, retirements, and hourly dispatch over multiple time horizons – to explore the techno-economic impacts of integrating EGS into California's electricity and gas end-use sectors. This least-cost model co-optimizes for system expansion to meet electricity and heating demands, subject to gradually decreasing emission targets to reach a net-zero economy in 2045. We evaluated multiple EGS-focused scenarios by varying drilling depth, seismic exclusion zones, and dispatch flexibility. This allowed us to determine the influence of these factors on system capacity, costs, and emission reductions. Results showed that allowing drilling depths up to 7 km yielded up to 82 GW of EGS capacity by 2045, reducing the total system capacity requirement by 40% and system costs by 8.6% compared to cases without EGS. Flexible EGS dispatch further decreased system costs by 12.3%, although it accelerated reservoir depletion in the long term. EGS also reduced reliance on power-to-gas systems and supported electrification of heating, decreasing the total power-to-gas capacity by 50% compared to cases without EGS. This study demonstrated that EGS could be a critical component in achieving California's 2045 net-zero emissions target, offering significant cost reductions and enhanced system reliability across both the electricity and gas sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Sustainable Energy & Fuels Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
394
期刊介绍: Sustainable Energy & Fuels will publish research that contributes to the development of sustainable energy technologies with a particular emphasis on new and next-generation technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信