风险社会中的科学教育:应对不确定未来中的挑战与机遇

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maurício Pietrocola, Samuel Schnorr, Ernani Rodrigues
{"title":"风险社会中的科学教育:应对不确定未来中的挑战与机遇","authors":"Maurício Pietrocola, Samuel Schnorr, Ernani Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporary science education themes are marked by the inevitable uncertainty of consequences emerging from human actions. They encompass disasters, pandemics and other events that have been marking our present times. Understanding new risks as the ones resulting from human action, even when proposing a solution for an issue, is one of the central assumptions of the Risk Society theory. Given the challenges of teaching about uncertain scenarios, in this work we address ways for dealing with science teaching situations in which unpredictable events are the rule. We report a teaching and learning sequence implementation in the 9th grade of a Brazilian mid school, using a real case of disaster to develop a didactic approach accounting for human-made risks. In this work we aimed to explore strategies for preparing teachers to deal with the inherent uncertainty of risk situations, overlapping semantic network analysis, risk matrix construction and its collective evaluation with. rounds of discussion and emphasizing the risk-confidence paradigm over the traditional hazardsecurity perspective. Our results show evidence of students' appropriation of the notion of manufactured risk by enacting complex causal relations in unpredictable scenarios, something also reflected in their utterances and in their pattern of choice during risk matrix building.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science Education in a Risk Society: Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in an Uncertain Future\",\"authors\":\"Maurício Pietrocola, Samuel Schnorr, Ernani Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contemporary science education themes are marked by the inevitable uncertainty of consequences emerging from human actions. They encompass disasters, pandemics and other events that have been marking our present times. Understanding new risks as the ones resulting from human action, even when proposing a solution for an issue, is one of the central assumptions of the Risk Society theory. Given the challenges of teaching about uncertain scenarios, in this work we address ways for dealing with science teaching situations in which unpredictable events are the rule. We report a teaching and learning sequence implementation in the 9th grade of a Brazilian mid school, using a real case of disaster to develop a didactic approach accounting for human-made risks. In this work we aimed to explore strategies for preparing teachers to deal with the inherent uncertainty of risk situations, overlapping semantic network analysis, risk matrix construction and its collective evaluation with. rounds of discussion and emphasizing the risk-confidence paradigm over the traditional hazardsecurity perspective. Our results show evidence of students' appropriation of the notion of manufactured risk by enacting complex causal relations in unpredictable scenarios, something also reflected in their utterances and in their pattern of choice during risk matrix building.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代科学教育主题的特点是人类行为所产生的后果的不可避免的不确定性。它们包括灾害、流行病和其他标志着我们当今时代的事件。风险社会理论的核心假设之一是,即使是在提出解决问题的方案时,也要把新的风险理解为人类行为造成的风险。考虑到在不确定的情况下教学的挑战,在这项工作中,我们解决了处理不可预测事件是规则的科学教学情况的方法。我们报告了在巴西一所中学九年级实施的教学和学习顺序,使用一个真实的灾难案例来开发一种考虑人为风险的教学方法。在这项工作中,我们旨在探讨策略,以准备教师处理风险情境的内在不确定性,重叠语义网络分析,风险矩阵的构建及其集体评价。多轮的讨论和强调风险-信心范式优于传统的危害安全视角。我们的研究结果表明,学生通过在不可预测的情况下制定复杂的因果关系来挪用人为风险的概念,这也反映在他们的话语和他们在风险矩阵构建过程中的选择模式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science Education in a Risk Society: Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in an Uncertain Future

Contemporary science education themes are marked by the inevitable uncertainty of consequences emerging from human actions. They encompass disasters, pandemics and other events that have been marking our present times. Understanding new risks as the ones resulting from human action, even when proposing a solution for an issue, is one of the central assumptions of the Risk Society theory. Given the challenges of teaching about uncertain scenarios, in this work we address ways for dealing with science teaching situations in which unpredictable events are the rule. We report a teaching and learning sequence implementation in the 9th grade of a Brazilian mid school, using a real case of disaster to develop a didactic approach accounting for human-made risks. In this work we aimed to explore strategies for preparing teachers to deal with the inherent uncertainty of risk situations, overlapping semantic network analysis, risk matrix construction and its collective evaluation with. rounds of discussion and emphasizing the risk-confidence paradigm over the traditional hazardsecurity perspective. Our results show evidence of students' appropriation of the notion of manufactured risk by enacting complex causal relations in unpredictable scenarios, something also reflected in their utterances and in their pattern of choice during risk matrix building.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信