在心血管护理中,数字技术如何用于促进医疗保健专业人员和患者之间的共同决策?范围审查。

Dirk Leysen, Eva Propst, Hannah McGowan, Franziska Pfannerstill, Rik Crutzen, Stefan Tino Kulnik
{"title":"在心血管护理中,数字技术如何用于促进医疗保健专业人员和患者之间的共同决策?范围审查。","authors":"Dirk Leysen, Eva Propst, Hannah McGowan, Franziska Pfannerstill, Rik Crutzen, Stefan Tino Kulnik","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To (i) identify characteristics of digital technologies (DTs) used to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) within the field of cardiovascular care, (ii) examine conceptualizations of SDM underpinning these DTs, and (iii) summarize designs and outcomes of evaluation studies concerning these DTs.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following methodological guidelines by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Ten scientific databases were searched. We selected peer-reviewed articles in cardiovascular care, with SDM and DT in the title and/or abstract published between January 2000 and March 2023. We extracted data on the type of DT, intended user(s), time point and mode of use, purpose, decision topic, underlying SDM model, and designs and outcomes of evaluation studies. Data were analysed descriptively in a narrative synthesis. From 4432 search results, 48 articles reporting on 31 DTs were included. Half of the articles were published after 2018, with most published in 2022. Most DTs are web-based applications for interactive use before and during the encounter between patient and healthcare professional, to convey information on cardiovascular care, calculate personal risk, and/or recommend treatment options. Shared decision-making conceptualizations refer to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and authors in the field. Thirty-seven evaluation studies report on 31 DTs, with heterogeneous results related to variation in intervention designs, measurement time points, and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A recent increase in the reporting of DTs to facilitate SDM in cardiovascular care indicates their potential. This scoping review offers researchers, developers, and clinicians a comprehensive overview of this literature.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TRGQ5.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":"522-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is digital technology used to facilitate shared decision-making between healthcare professionals and patients in cardiovascular care? A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Leysen, Eva Propst, Hannah McGowan, Franziska Pfannerstill, Rik Crutzen, Stefan Tino Kulnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To (i) identify characteristics of digital technologies (DTs) used to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) within the field of cardiovascular care, (ii) examine conceptualizations of SDM underpinning these DTs, and (iii) summarize designs and outcomes of evaluation studies concerning these DTs.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following methodological guidelines by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Ten scientific databases were searched. We selected peer-reviewed articles in cardiovascular care, with SDM and DT in the title and/or abstract published between January 2000 and March 2023. We extracted data on the type of DT, intended user(s), time point and mode of use, purpose, decision topic, underlying SDM model, and designs and outcomes of evaluation studies. Data were analysed descriptively in a narrative synthesis. From 4432 search results, 48 articles reporting on 31 DTs were included. Half of the articles were published after 2018, with most published in 2022. Most DTs are web-based applications for interactive use before and during the encounter between patient and healthcare professional, to convey information on cardiovascular care, calculate personal risk, and/or recommend treatment options. Shared decision-making conceptualizations refer to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and authors in the field. Thirty-seven evaluation studies report on 31 DTs, with heterogeneous results related to variation in intervention designs, measurement time points, and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A recent increase in the reporting of DTs to facilitate SDM in cardiovascular care indicates their potential. This scoping review offers researchers, developers, and clinicians a comprehensive overview of this literature.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TRGQ5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"522-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1)确定用于促进心血管护理领域共享决策(SDM)的数字技术(DTs)的特征,(2)检查支撑这些DTs的SDM概念,以及(3)总结有关这些DTs的评估研究的设计和结果。方法和结果:我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法学指导方针进行了范围审查。检索了10个科学数据库。我们选择了2000年1月至2023年3月间发表的心血管护理领域的同行评审文章,标题和/或摘要中有SDM和DT。我们提取了关于DT类型、预期用户、时间点和使用模式、目的、决策主题、基础SDM模型以及评估研究的设计和结果的数据。数据以叙述综合的方式进行描述性分析。从4,432个搜索结果中,包括48篇报道31个dt的文章。一半的文章发表于2018年之后,大部分发表于2022年。大多数DTs是基于web的应用程序,在患者与医疗保健专业人员会面之前和期间进行交互使用,以传达心血管护理信息,计算个人风险和/或推荐治疗方案。SDM的概念参考了国际患者决策辅助标准和该领域的作者。37项评价研究报告了31项DTs,结果与干预设计、测量时间点和结果测量的差异有关。结论:最近关于DTs在心血管护理中促进SDM的报道有所增加,这表明了它们的潜力。本综述为研究人员、开发人员和临床医生提供了本文献的全面概述。注册:Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TRGQ5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How is digital technology used to facilitate shared decision-making between healthcare professionals and patients in cardiovascular care? A scoping review.

Aims: To (i) identify characteristics of digital technologies (DTs) used to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) within the field of cardiovascular care, (ii) examine conceptualizations of SDM underpinning these DTs, and (iii) summarize designs and outcomes of evaluation studies concerning these DTs.

Methods and results: We conducted a scoping review following methodological guidelines by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Ten scientific databases were searched. We selected peer-reviewed articles in cardiovascular care, with SDM and DT in the title and/or abstract published between January 2000 and March 2023. We extracted data on the type of DT, intended user(s), time point and mode of use, purpose, decision topic, underlying SDM model, and designs and outcomes of evaluation studies. Data were analysed descriptively in a narrative synthesis. From 4432 search results, 48 articles reporting on 31 DTs were included. Half of the articles were published after 2018, with most published in 2022. Most DTs are web-based applications for interactive use before and during the encounter between patient and healthcare professional, to convey information on cardiovascular care, calculate personal risk, and/or recommend treatment options. Shared decision-making conceptualizations refer to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and authors in the field. Thirty-seven evaluation studies report on 31 DTs, with heterogeneous results related to variation in intervention designs, measurement time points, and outcome measures.

Conclusion: A recent increase in the reporting of DTs to facilitate SDM in cardiovascular care indicates their potential. This scoping review offers researchers, developers, and clinicians a comprehensive overview of this literature.

Registration: Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TRGQ5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信