Alipi V Bonm, Michael S Rutenberg, Kate E Therkelsen, John Herbst, Anurag Sanaf, Marissa A Sherwood, John Y Rhee, Tresa M McGranahan, Patrick J Cimino, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Derek S Tsang, Matthias A Karajannis, Seema Nagpal, Robert J Amdur, Helen Shih, Jason Barber, Lynne P Taylor
{"title":"现代成人发病髓母细胞瘤的多机构回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Alipi V Bonm, Michael S Rutenberg, Kate E Therkelsen, John Herbst, Anurag Sanaf, Marissa A Sherwood, John Y Rhee, Tresa M McGranahan, Patrick J Cimino, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Derek S Tsang, Matthias A Karajannis, Seema Nagpal, Robert J Amdur, Helen Shih, Jason Barber, Lynne P Taylor","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult onset medulloblastoma (aMB) is a rare tumor with limited available evidence. We present a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort of aMB patients treated in the modern era, with an emphasis on understanding the role of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 267 consecutive patients with aMB treated at 7 different institutions from 2000-present, controlling for chemotherapy regimen and cycles received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment factors were highly intercorrelated with one another and with treating institution. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS on univariable analyses (HR = 0.55, <i>P</i> = .029) and on multivariable analysis when adjusting for risk status (HR 0.55, <i>P</i> = .026) but not when also adjusting for treating institution. Proton craniospinal irradiation was associated with improved survival on univariable (HR = 0.50, <i>P</i> = .019) and multivariable analysis adjusting for risk status (HR = 0.51, <i>P</i> = .024) but not when treating institution was also considered. On subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in M0 (HR = 0.55, <i>P</i> = .043) but not M1 disease, in patients with subtotal resection (HR = 0.43, <i>P</i> = .048) but not those with GTR. Similarly, progression-free survival was improved with chemotherapy in patients with M0 (HR = 0.57, <i>P</i> = .032) but not M1 disease, and in patients with subtotal (HR = 0.50, <i>P</i> = .054) but not gross total resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no benefit of concurrent chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and this effect was driven by select subgroups, specifically those with M0 disease and those with residual tumor. We could not confirm that these associations are independent of the treating institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdae231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-institutional retrospective cohort of adult-onset medulloblastoma in the modern era.\",\"authors\":\"Alipi V Bonm, Michael S Rutenberg, Kate E Therkelsen, John Herbst, Anurag Sanaf, Marissa A Sherwood, John Y Rhee, Tresa M McGranahan, Patrick J Cimino, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Derek S Tsang, Matthias A Karajannis, Seema Nagpal, Robert J Amdur, Helen Shih, Jason Barber, Lynne P Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult onset medulloblastoma (aMB) is a rare tumor with limited available evidence. We present a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort of aMB patients treated in the modern era, with an emphasis on understanding the role of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 267 consecutive patients with aMB treated at 7 different institutions from 2000-present, controlling for chemotherapy regimen and cycles received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment factors were highly intercorrelated with one another and with treating institution. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS on univariable analyses (HR = 0.55, <i>P</i> = .029) and on multivariable analysis when adjusting for risk status (HR 0.55, <i>P</i> = .026) but not when also adjusting for treating institution. Proton craniospinal irradiation was associated with improved survival on univariable (HR = 0.50, <i>P</i> = .019) and multivariable analysis adjusting for risk status (HR = 0.51, <i>P</i> = .024) but not when treating institution was also considered. On subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in M0 (HR = 0.55, <i>P</i> = .043) but not M1 disease, in patients with subtotal resection (HR = 0.43, <i>P</i> = .048) but not those with GTR. Similarly, progression-free survival was improved with chemotherapy in patients with M0 (HR = 0.57, <i>P</i> = .032) but not M1 disease, and in patients with subtotal (HR = 0.50, <i>P</i> = .054) but not gross total resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no benefit of concurrent chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and this effect was driven by select subgroups, specifically those with M0 disease and those with residual tumor. We could not confirm that these associations are independent of the treating institution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:成人发病髓母细胞瘤(aMB)是一种罕见的肿瘤,现有证据有限。我们提出了一个大型的多机构回顾性队列在现代治疗的aMB患者,重点是了解化疗在初始诊断中的作用。方法:我们纳入了2000年至今在7家不同机构连续治疗的267例aMB患者,控制化疗方案和周期。结果:各治疗因素之间及与治疗机构之间均呈高度相关。同时化疗与总生存期(OS)无关。单变量分析(HR = 0.55, P = 0.029)和多变量分析(HR = 0.55, P = 0.026)显示辅助化疗与OS相关,但在调整治疗机构时无相关。在单变量分析(HR = 0.50, P = 0.019)和调整风险状态的多变量分析(HR = 0.51, P = 0.024)中,质子颅脊髓照射与生存率的提高相关,但在考虑治疗机构时则无关。在亚组分析中,辅助化疗与M0患者(HR = 0.55, P = 0.043)的生存率相关,而与M1疾病无关,与次全切除患者(HR = 0.43, P = 0.048)的生存率相关,而与GTR患者的生存率无关。同样,M0患者(HR = 0.57, P = 0.032)和总切除患者(HR = 0.50, P = 0.054)化疗可改善无进展生存期。结论:同期化疗无获益。辅助化疗与总生存率的提高相关,这种效果是由选定的亚组驱动的,特别是那些患有M0疾病和残留肿瘤的人。我们无法确认这些关联是否独立于治疗机构。
A multi-institutional retrospective cohort of adult-onset medulloblastoma in the modern era.
Background: Adult onset medulloblastoma (aMB) is a rare tumor with limited available evidence. We present a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort of aMB patients treated in the modern era, with an emphasis on understanding the role of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis.
Methods: We included 267 consecutive patients with aMB treated at 7 different institutions from 2000-present, controlling for chemotherapy regimen and cycles received.
Results: Treatment factors were highly intercorrelated with one another and with treating institution. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival (OS). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with OS on univariable analyses (HR = 0.55, P = .029) and on multivariable analysis when adjusting for risk status (HR 0.55, P = .026) but not when also adjusting for treating institution. Proton craniospinal irradiation was associated with improved survival on univariable (HR = 0.50, P = .019) and multivariable analysis adjusting for risk status (HR = 0.51, P = .024) but not when treating institution was also considered. On subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in M0 (HR = 0.55, P = .043) but not M1 disease, in patients with subtotal resection (HR = 0.43, P = .048) but not those with GTR. Similarly, progression-free survival was improved with chemotherapy in patients with M0 (HR = 0.57, P = .032) but not M1 disease, and in patients with subtotal (HR = 0.50, P = .054) but not gross total resection.
Conclusions: There was no benefit of concurrent chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and this effect was driven by select subgroups, specifically those with M0 disease and those with residual tumor. We could not confirm that these associations are independent of the treating institution.