在医学教育中使用学习分析的伦理考虑:批判性回顾。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10402-7
Kayla Marcotte, Phillip Yang, M Andrew Millis, Christian J Vercler, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Andrew E Krumm, Brian C George
{"title":"在医学教育中使用学习分析的伦理考虑:批判性回顾。","authors":"Kayla Marcotte, Phillip Yang, M Andrew Millis, Christian J Vercler, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Andrew E Krumm, Brian C George","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10402-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning analytics are increasingly used in medical education to analyze data and make decisions about learners' abilities. While there are many potential benefits of using learning analytics to drive improvement in medical education, there are also ethical concerns surrounding how this may affect learners and their patients. We conducted a critical review of studies that use learning analytics and big data within medical education. Using guidelines established by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), relevant articles were identified in MEDLINE (PubMed) and SocINDEX databases from inception to April 2021. Detailed data abstraction was performed across studies to identify current uses of learning analytics and identify potential ethical concerns. Eighteen articles met the search criteria. Our analysis identified the use of learning analytics and big data in four aspects of medical education: (1) the learning process and pedagogy; (2) retrospective assessment; (3) prospective assessment; and (4) improvement of education. We identified some ethical concerns surrounding the use of learning analytics and big data, including the (1) trustworthiness of data; (2) reliability of methodology; (3) privacy, confidentiality, and management of data; and (4) labeling of learners as \"problematic.\" Using Beauchamp and Childress's biomedical ethics as a framework, we identified potential consequences of using learning analytics for learners within the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. As learning analytics becomes more widespread in medical education, examining and mitigating potential harm towards learners is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":"87-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical considerations of using learning analytics in medical education: a critical review.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Marcotte, Phillip Yang, M Andrew Millis, Christian J Vercler, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Andrew E Krumm, Brian C George\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-024-10402-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Learning analytics are increasingly used in medical education to analyze data and make decisions about learners' abilities. While there are many potential benefits of using learning analytics to drive improvement in medical education, there are also ethical concerns surrounding how this may affect learners and their patients. We conducted a critical review of studies that use learning analytics and big data within medical education. Using guidelines established by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), relevant articles were identified in MEDLINE (PubMed) and SocINDEX databases from inception to April 2021. Detailed data abstraction was performed across studies to identify current uses of learning analytics and identify potential ethical concerns. Eighteen articles met the search criteria. Our analysis identified the use of learning analytics and big data in four aspects of medical education: (1) the learning process and pedagogy; (2) retrospective assessment; (3) prospective assessment; and (4) improvement of education. We identified some ethical concerns surrounding the use of learning analytics and big data, including the (1) trustworthiness of data; (2) reliability of methodology; (3) privacy, confidentiality, and management of data; and (4) labeling of learners as \\\"problematic.\\\" Using Beauchamp and Childress's biomedical ethics as a framework, we identified potential consequences of using learning analytics for learners within the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. As learning analytics becomes more widespread in medical education, examining and mitigating potential harm towards learners is imperative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10402-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10402-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习分析在医学教育中越来越多地用于分析数据并对学习者的能力做出决定。虽然使用学习分析来推动医学教育的改进有许多潜在的好处,但也存在关于这可能会如何影响学习者及其患者的伦理问题。我们对医学教育中使用学习分析和大数据的研究进行了批判性回顾。使用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)建立的指南,在MEDLINE (PubMed)和SocINDEX数据库中确定了从成立到2021年4月的相关文章。在研究中进行了详细的数据抽象,以确定学习分析的当前用途,并确定潜在的伦理问题。18篇文章符合检索标准。我们的分析确定了在医学教育的四个方面使用学习分析和大数据:(1)学习过程和教学法;(2)回顾性评估;(3)前瞻性评价;(4)提高教育水平。我们确定了围绕学习分析和大数据使用的一些道德问题,包括:(1)数据的可信度;(2)方法的可靠性;(3)数据的隐私、保密和管理;(4)给学习者贴上“有问题”的标签。以Beauchamp和Childress的生物医学伦理学为框架,我们确定了在仁慈、无害、自主和正义原则下对学习者使用学习分析的潜在后果。随着学习分析在医学教育中变得越来越普遍,检查和减轻对学习者的潜在伤害势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical considerations of using learning analytics in medical education: a critical review.

Learning analytics are increasingly used in medical education to analyze data and make decisions about learners' abilities. While there are many potential benefits of using learning analytics to drive improvement in medical education, there are also ethical concerns surrounding how this may affect learners and their patients. We conducted a critical review of studies that use learning analytics and big data within medical education. Using guidelines established by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), relevant articles were identified in MEDLINE (PubMed) and SocINDEX databases from inception to April 2021. Detailed data abstraction was performed across studies to identify current uses of learning analytics and identify potential ethical concerns. Eighteen articles met the search criteria. Our analysis identified the use of learning analytics and big data in four aspects of medical education: (1) the learning process and pedagogy; (2) retrospective assessment; (3) prospective assessment; and (4) improvement of education. We identified some ethical concerns surrounding the use of learning analytics and big data, including the (1) trustworthiness of data; (2) reliability of methodology; (3) privacy, confidentiality, and management of data; and (4) labeling of learners as "problematic." Using Beauchamp and Childress's biomedical ethics as a framework, we identified potential consequences of using learning analytics for learners within the principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. As learning analytics becomes more widespread in medical education, examining and mitigating potential harm towards learners is imperative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信