单侧小耳重建耳廓的人体测量差异。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Aqilah Mumtazah, Rizka Uswatun Hasanah, Faizal Rezky Dhafin, Imaniar Fitri Aisyah, Rosa Falerina, Muhtarum Yusuf, Indri Lakhsmi Putri
{"title":"单侧小耳重建耳廓的人体测量差异。","authors":"Aqilah Mumtazah, Rizka Uswatun Hasanah, Faizal Rezky Dhafin, Imaniar Fitri Aisyah, Rosa Falerina, Muhtarum Yusuf, Indri Lakhsmi Putri","doi":"10.1177/10556656251320757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of auricular reconstruction by comparing the anthropometric differences between the reconstructed and normal auricles.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><p>All microtia patients who underwent surgery at Airlangga University Hospital, Indonesia.</p><p><p>Patients with unilateral microtia who had completed auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage at Airlangga University Hospital, with a more than 3 months follow-up between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><p>Primary data were obtained through auricle photographs, and a medical engineer performed anthropometric measurements. The data were analyzed using a paired <i>t</i> test.</p><p><p>The primary parameters measured were the ratios of auricle width to lobular width and auricle height to lobular height for each subject's right and left auricles. The differences between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side were assessed.</p><p><p>In a sample of 20 patients, no significant difference was observed in the ratio of auricle width to lobular width (<i>P</i> > .05). However, a significant difference was found in the ratio of auricle height to lobular height between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><p>Future studies should consider utilizing the ratio of auricle width to lobular width as an objective indicator of success in microtia reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251320757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropometric Difference of Unilateral Microtia Reconstructed Auricle.\",\"authors\":\"Aqilah Mumtazah, Rizka Uswatun Hasanah, Faizal Rezky Dhafin, Imaniar Fitri Aisyah, Rosa Falerina, Muhtarum Yusuf, Indri Lakhsmi Putri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656251320757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of auricular reconstruction by comparing the anthropometric differences between the reconstructed and normal auricles.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><p>All microtia patients who underwent surgery at Airlangga University Hospital, Indonesia.</p><p><p>Patients with unilateral microtia who had completed auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage at Airlangga University Hospital, with a more than 3 months follow-up between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><p>Primary data were obtained through auricle photographs, and a medical engineer performed anthropometric measurements. The data were analyzed using a paired <i>t</i> test.</p><p><p>The primary parameters measured were the ratios of auricle width to lobular width and auricle height to lobular height for each subject's right and left auricles. The differences between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side were assessed.</p><p><p>In a sample of 20 patients, no significant difference was observed in the ratio of auricle width to lobular width (<i>P</i> > .05). However, a significant difference was found in the ratio of auricle height to lobular height between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><p>Future studies should consider utilizing the ratio of auricle width to lobular width as an objective indicator of success in microtia reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656251320757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251320757\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251320757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过比较耳廓重建与正常耳廓的人体测量差异来评估耳廓重建的手术效果。横断面研究。所有在印尼艾尔朗加大学医院接受手术的小脑症患者。2019年至2022年,在艾尔朗加大学医院使用自体肋软骨完成耳廓重建的单侧小耳患者随访超过3个月。主要数据是通过耳廓照片获得的,一名医学工程师进行了人体测量。采用配对t检验对数据进行分析。测量的主要参数是每个受试者左右耳廓的耳廓宽度与小叶宽度的比值和耳廓高度与小叶高度的比值。评估重建耳廓与正常对侧耳廓的差异。在20例患者中,耳廓宽度与小叶宽度之比无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。然而,重建的耳廓高度与小叶高度之比与正常对侧耳廓有显著差异(P),未来的研究应考虑将耳廓宽度与小叶宽度之比作为小耳重建成功的客观指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anthropometric Difference of Unilateral Microtia Reconstructed Auricle.

This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of auricular reconstruction by comparing the anthropometric differences between the reconstructed and normal auricles.

Cross-sectional study.

All microtia patients who underwent surgery at Airlangga University Hospital, Indonesia.

Patients with unilateral microtia who had completed auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage at Airlangga University Hospital, with a more than 3 months follow-up between 2019 and 2022.

Primary data were obtained through auricle photographs, and a medical engineer performed anthropometric measurements. The data were analyzed using a paired t test.

The primary parameters measured were the ratios of auricle width to lobular width and auricle height to lobular height for each subject's right and left auricles. The differences between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side were assessed.

In a sample of 20 patients, no significant difference was observed in the ratio of auricle width to lobular width (P > .05). However, a significant difference was found in the ratio of auricle height to lobular height between the reconstructed auricle and the normal contralateral side (P < .05).

Future studies should consider utilizing the ratio of auricle width to lobular width as an objective indicator of success in microtia reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信