Hannah Darwazah, Jared B Hammond, Stephen L Aita, Grant G Moncrief, Ryan C Thompson, Jonathan D Lichtenstein, Robert M Roth
{"title":"COVID-19急性后后遗症患者冠状病毒焦虑及其与情绪和认知的关系","authors":"Hannah Darwazah, Jared B Hammond, Stephen L Aita, Grant G Moncrief, Ryan C Thompson, Jonathan D Lichtenstein, Robert M Roth","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2469247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction may be observed in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), and are associated with depression and general anxiety. Coronavirus anxiety (CA) is associated with subjective cognition, depression, and general anxiety in community samples. We determined the base rate of CA in patients with PASC and its relation to mood, subjective and objective cognition. <b>Design and Methods:</b> Participants were 79 patients with PASC referred for clinical neuropsychological evaluation, who completed the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), BDI-II, BAI, BRIEF-A, and cognitive tests. <b>Results:</b> Base rate of clinically elevated CAS was low (5.1%), whereas BDI-II (78.6%), BAI (80%), and BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC; 60.3%) were high. Objective dysfunction was most common for Color-Word Interference (20.8%) and Trail Making Test (TMT) Part-B (23.1%). Greater CA was associated with worse depression, general anxiety, BRIEF-A GEC, and TMT Part-A. Higher GAI accounted for the CAS and BRIEF-A GEC association. Longer time since pandemic onset was only associated with decreasing CA. Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure for the CAS. <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinically elevated CA is rare in patients with PASC seen for neuropsychological evaluation. Higher CA is associated with worse mood and subjective executive dysfunction, though the latter was accounted for by general anxiety. Patients with PASC who endorse a high level of CA would likely benefit from interventions to reduce emotional distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronavirus anxiety and its relationship to mood and cognition in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Darwazah, Jared B Hammond, Stephen L Aita, Grant G Moncrief, Ryan C Thompson, Jonathan D Lichtenstein, Robert M Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2469247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction may be observed in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), and are associated with depression and general anxiety. Coronavirus anxiety (CA) is associated with subjective cognition, depression, and general anxiety in community samples. We determined the base rate of CA in patients with PASC and its relation to mood, subjective and objective cognition. <b>Design and Methods:</b> Participants were 79 patients with PASC referred for clinical neuropsychological evaluation, who completed the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), BDI-II, BAI, BRIEF-A, and cognitive tests. <b>Results:</b> Base rate of clinically elevated CAS was low (5.1%), whereas BDI-II (78.6%), BAI (80%), and BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC; 60.3%) were high. Objective dysfunction was most common for Color-Word Interference (20.8%) and Trail Making Test (TMT) Part-B (23.1%). Greater CA was associated with worse depression, general anxiety, BRIEF-A GEC, and TMT Part-A. Higher GAI accounted for the CAS and BRIEF-A GEC association. Longer time since pandemic onset was only associated with decreasing CA. Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure for the CAS. <b>Conclusions:</b> Clinically elevated CA is rare in patients with PASC seen for neuropsychological evaluation. Higher CA is associated with worse mood and subjective executive dysfunction, though the latter was accounted for by general anxiety. Patients with PASC who endorse a high level of CA would likely benefit from interventions to reduce emotional distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2469247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2469247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新冠肺炎急性后后遗症(PASC)患者可观察到主观和客观认知功能障碍,并与抑郁和一般焦虑相关。在社区样本中,冠状病毒焦虑(CA)与主观认知、抑郁和一般焦虑有关。测定PASC患者CA的基本发生率及其与情绪、主观认知和客观认知的关系。设计和方法:参与者为79例PASC患者,进行临床神经心理学评估,他们完成了冠状病毒焦虑量表(CAS)、BDI-II、BAI、BRIEF-A和认知测试。结果:临床CAS升高的基础率较低(5.1%),而BDI-II(78.6%)、BAI(80%)和BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC;60.3%)高。客观功能障碍在色字干扰(20.8%)和TMT - b部分(23.1%)中最为常见。更大的CA与更严重的抑郁、一般焦虑、BRIEF-A GEC和TMT Part-A相关。较高的GAI是CAS和BRIEF-A GEC关联的原因。大流行发生的时间越长,仅与CA降低有关。探索性因素分析支持CAS的一维结构。结论:临床CA升高在PASC患者中是罕见的,用于神经心理学评估。较高的CA与较差的情绪和主观执行功能障碍有关,尽管后者是由普遍焦虑引起的。高CA水平的PASC患者可能会从减少情绪困扰的干预中受益。
Coronavirus anxiety and its relationship to mood and cognition in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.
Background: Subjective and objective cognitive dysfunction may be observed in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), and are associated with depression and general anxiety. Coronavirus anxiety (CA) is associated with subjective cognition, depression, and general anxiety in community samples. We determined the base rate of CA in patients with PASC and its relation to mood, subjective and objective cognition. Design and Methods: Participants were 79 patients with PASC referred for clinical neuropsychological evaluation, who completed the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), BDI-II, BAI, BRIEF-A, and cognitive tests. Results: Base rate of clinically elevated CAS was low (5.1%), whereas BDI-II (78.6%), BAI (80%), and BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (GEC; 60.3%) were high. Objective dysfunction was most common for Color-Word Interference (20.8%) and Trail Making Test (TMT) Part-B (23.1%). Greater CA was associated with worse depression, general anxiety, BRIEF-A GEC, and TMT Part-A. Higher GAI accounted for the CAS and BRIEF-A GEC association. Longer time since pandemic onset was only associated with decreasing CA. Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure for the CAS. Conclusions: Clinically elevated CA is rare in patients with PASC seen for neuropsychological evaluation. Higher CA is associated with worse mood and subjective executive dysfunction, though the latter was accounted for by general anxiety. Patients with PASC who endorse a high level of CA would likely benefit from interventions to reduce emotional distress.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.