生殖股神经调节作为慢性睾丸疼痛患者疼痛管理的新解决方案:一项概念验证研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S507805
Tran Ngoc An Huynh, Jeffrey Jiang, Paul Manohar
{"title":"生殖股神经调节作为慢性睾丸疼痛患者疼痛管理的新解决方案:一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Tran Ngoc An Huynh, Jeffrey Jiang, Paul Manohar","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S507805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe chronic testicular pain that has failed medical therapy and physiotherapy poses a treatment dilemma. This study presents a proof of concept for the use of genitofemoral neuromodulation (GFM) as a potential pain management solution for patients with persistent testicular pain unresponsive to conservative and surgical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to conventional treatments were selected for GFM. A total of three patients were included in this proof-of-concept study. Demographic information, prior medical and surgical interventions, and pre- and post-operative pain scores using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale were collected. All patients must have had temporary relief from pain with a spermatic cord block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient 1 (75 years old) had a history of opioid medication use, physiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and nerve block. His pain score reduced from 10/10 to 4/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 2 (59 years old) had a history of opioid, nortriptyline, baclofen medication use, and physiotherapy. His pain score reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 3 (36 years old) had a history of opioid medication use and physiotherapy, and bilateral orchidectomy for pain relief. His pain score reduced from 8/10 to 6/10 six months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that GFM is effective in reduce pain scores and could be a viable option for patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to traditional interventions. Further research is essential to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of GFM in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"43-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genitofemoral Neuromodulation as a Novel Pain Management Solution for Patients with Chronic Testicular Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tran Ngoc An Huynh, Jeffrey Jiang, Paul Manohar\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RRU.S507805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe chronic testicular pain that has failed medical therapy and physiotherapy poses a treatment dilemma. This study presents a proof of concept for the use of genitofemoral neuromodulation (GFM) as a potential pain management solution for patients with persistent testicular pain unresponsive to conservative and surgical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to conventional treatments were selected for GFM. A total of three patients were included in this proof-of-concept study. Demographic information, prior medical and surgical interventions, and pre- and post-operative pain scores using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale were collected. All patients must have had temporary relief from pain with a spermatic cord block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient 1 (75 years old) had a history of opioid medication use, physiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and nerve block. His pain score reduced from 10/10 to 4/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 2 (59 years old) had a history of opioid, nortriptyline, baclofen medication use, and physiotherapy. His pain score reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 3 (36 years old) had a history of opioid medication use and physiotherapy, and bilateral orchidectomy for pain relief. His pain score reduced from 8/10 to 6/10 six months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that GFM is effective in reduce pain scores and could be a viable option for patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to traditional interventions. Further research is essential to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of GFM in this cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Reports in Urology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"43-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Reports in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S507805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S507805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重的慢性睾丸疼痛,已经失败的药物治疗和物理治疗提出了一个困境的治疗。本研究提出了使用生殖-股神经调节(GFM)作为对保守和手术治疗无反应的持续性睾丸疼痛患者的潜在疼痛管理解决方案的概念证明。方法:选择常规治疗难治的慢性睾丸痛患者进行GFM治疗。这项概念验证研究共纳入了三名患者。收集了人口统计信息、既往医疗和手术干预以及使用数值评定疼痛量表的术前和术后疼痛评分。所有患者都必须通过精索阻滞暂时缓解疼痛。结果:患者1(75岁)有阿片类药物使用、物理治疗、射频消融和神经阻滞的病史。术后6个月疼痛评分由10/10降至4/10。患者2(59岁)有阿片类药物、去甲替林、巴氯芬药物使用史和物理治疗史。术后6个月疼痛评分由9/10降至2/10。患者3(36岁)有阿片类药物使用和物理治疗史,双侧睾丸切除术缓解疼痛。术后6个月疼痛评分由8/10降至6/10。结论:本研究提示GFM可有效降低疼痛评分,对于传统干预措施难治性慢性睾丸痛患者可能是一种可行的选择。进一步的研究对于确定GFM在该队列中的长期有效性和安全性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genitofemoral Neuromodulation as a Novel Pain Management Solution for Patients with Chronic Testicular Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Introduction: Severe chronic testicular pain that has failed medical therapy and physiotherapy poses a treatment dilemma. This study presents a proof of concept for the use of genitofemoral neuromodulation (GFM) as a potential pain management solution for patients with persistent testicular pain unresponsive to conservative and surgical management.

Methods: Patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to conventional treatments were selected for GFM. A total of three patients were included in this proof-of-concept study. Demographic information, prior medical and surgical interventions, and pre- and post-operative pain scores using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale were collected. All patients must have had temporary relief from pain with a spermatic cord block.

Results: Patient 1 (75 years old) had a history of opioid medication use, physiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and nerve block. His pain score reduced from 10/10 to 4/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 2 (59 years old) had a history of opioid, nortriptyline, baclofen medication use, and physiotherapy. His pain score reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 six months post-operatively. Patient 3 (36 years old) had a history of opioid medication use and physiotherapy, and bilateral orchidectomy for pain relief. His pain score reduced from 8/10 to 6/10 six months post-operatively.

Conclusion: This study suggests that GFM is effective in reduce pain scores and could be a viable option for patients with chronic testicular pain refractory to traditional interventions. Further research is essential to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of GFM in this cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信