缓释口服达福普啶似乎对多发性硬化症患者的上肢功能没有影响:随机对照试验。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251321696
Shay Menascu, Lior Frid, Alon Kalron
{"title":"缓释口服达福普啶似乎对多发性硬化症患者的上肢功能没有影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Shay Menascu, Lior Frid, Alon Kalron","doi":"10.1177/17562864251321696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper limb dysfunction is common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), significantly affecting daily activities and quality of life. While dalfampridine has shown efficacy in improving gait in pwMS, its impact on upper extremity function remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sustained-release oral dalfampridine on upper extremity function in pwMS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 30 pwMS were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 2 weeks. Upper extremity function was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks post-treatment using clinical tests (9-Hole Peg Test, Box, and Block Test, peak isometric grip force, 2-point discrimination) and self-reported questionnaires (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, ability measure of the hand, Manual Ability Measurement 36). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate group × time interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant group × time interactions were observed across clinical or self-reported outcomes. Both groups exhibited similar trends over time, with no measurable improvements in upper extremity dexterity, strength, or perceived function attributable to dalfampridine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sustained-release dalfampridine does not appear to improve upper extremity function in pwMS, highlighting its limitations beyond gait-related benefits. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore alternative treatments targeting upper limb dysfunction in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251321696"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustained-release oral dalfampridine appears to have no impact on upper extremity function in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shay Menascu, Lior Frid, Alon Kalron\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864251321696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper limb dysfunction is common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), significantly affecting daily activities and quality of life. While dalfampridine has shown efficacy in improving gait in pwMS, its impact on upper extremity function remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sustained-release oral dalfampridine on upper extremity function in pwMS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 30 pwMS were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 2 weeks. Upper extremity function was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks post-treatment using clinical tests (9-Hole Peg Test, Box, and Block Test, peak isometric grip force, 2-point discrimination) and self-reported questionnaires (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, ability measure of the hand, Manual Ability Measurement 36). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate group × time interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant group × time interactions were observed across clinical or self-reported outcomes. Both groups exhibited similar trends over time, with no measurable improvements in upper extremity dexterity, strength, or perceived function attributable to dalfampridine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sustained-release dalfampridine does not appear to improve upper extremity function in pwMS, highlighting its limitations beyond gait-related benefits. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore alternative treatments targeting upper limb dysfunction in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17562864251321696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251321696\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251321696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustained-release oral dalfampridine appears to have no impact on upper extremity function in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Upper limb dysfunction is common in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), significantly affecting daily activities and quality of life. While dalfampridine has shown efficacy in improving gait in pwMS, its impact on upper extremity function remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of sustained-release oral dalfampridine on upper extremity function in pwMS.

Design: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods: In all, 30 pwMS were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 2 weeks. Upper extremity function was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, after 2 weeks of treatment, and 2 weeks post-treatment using clinical tests (9-Hole Peg Test, Box, and Block Test, peak isometric grip force, 2-point discrimination) and self-reported questionnaires (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, ability measure of the hand, Manual Ability Measurement 36). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to evaluate group × time interactions.

Results: No significant group × time interactions were observed across clinical or self-reported outcomes. Both groups exhibited similar trends over time, with no measurable improvements in upper extremity dexterity, strength, or perceived function attributable to dalfampridine.

Conclusion: Sustained-release dalfampridine does not appear to improve upper extremity function in pwMS, highlighting its limitations beyond gait-related benefits. These findings underscore the need for further research to explore alternative treatments targeting upper limb dysfunction in this population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02259361.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信