强直性脊柱炎患者到医院的驾车距离、驾车时间和公共交通时间与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂持续存在的关系:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S504479
Aran Kim, Min Wook So, Seung-Geun Lee
{"title":"强直性脊柱炎患者到医院的驾车距离、驾车时间和公共交通时间与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂持续存在的关系:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Aran Kim, Min Wook So, Seung-Geun Lee","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S504479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Research on the impact of geographical distance from or travel time to healthcare facilities on treatment adherence among patients with rheumatic diseases is lacking. Therefore, we investigated the association of the driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital with the persistence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This 19-year retrospective cohort study was performed in the rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital in Korea and analyzed 313 adult patients with AS who were newly initiated on TNF-α inhibitors. The driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were calculated using the Naver Map application. Drug persistence of TNF-α inhibitors was defined as the time duration between the index date and the date of discontinuation without exceeding a treatment gap of 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly prescribed TNF-α inhibitor in patients with AS was adalimumab (69.3%), followed by etanercept (21.4%) and infliximab (9.3%). The median driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were 16 kilometers (km), 0.6 hours, and 0.8 hours, respectively. In total, 120 (38.3%) patients with AS stopped TNF-α inhibitors over a median follow-up period of 67.1 months. After adjusting confounding factors, the driving distance to the hospital per 10-km increase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.09, p=0.017) and the driving distance to hospital ≧16 km (HR=1.9, p=0.001) were significantly associated with a higher risk of TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. Neither the driving time nor the public transit time to the hospital was significantly associated with TNF-α inhibitor persistence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer driving distances significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation, highlighting the need for healthcare systems to address these barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"373-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the Driving Distance, Driving Time, and Public Transit Time to the Hospital with the Persistence of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Aran Kim, Min Wook So, Seung-Geun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S504479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Research on the impact of geographical distance from or travel time to healthcare facilities on treatment adherence among patients with rheumatic diseases is lacking. Therefore, we investigated the association of the driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital with the persistence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This 19-year retrospective cohort study was performed in the rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital in Korea and analyzed 313 adult patients with AS who were newly initiated on TNF-α inhibitors. The driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were calculated using the Naver Map application. Drug persistence of TNF-α inhibitors was defined as the time duration between the index date and the date of discontinuation without exceeding a treatment gap of 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly prescribed TNF-α inhibitor in patients with AS was adalimumab (69.3%), followed by etanercept (21.4%) and infliximab (9.3%). The median driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were 16 kilometers (km), 0.6 hours, and 0.8 hours, respectively. In total, 120 (38.3%) patients with AS stopped TNF-α inhibitors over a median follow-up period of 67.1 months. After adjusting confounding factors, the driving distance to the hospital per 10-km increase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.09, p=0.017) and the driving distance to hospital ≧16 km (HR=1.9, p=0.001) were significantly associated with a higher risk of TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. Neither the driving time nor the public transit time to the hospital was significantly associated with TNF-α inhibitor persistence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer driving distances significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation, highlighting the need for healthcare systems to address these barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"373-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S504479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S504479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尚缺乏风湿病患者到医疗机构的地理距离或旅行时间对治疗依从性的影响的研究。因此,我们研究了强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者开车距离、开车时间和到医院的公共交通时间与肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)抑制剂持续时间的关系。患者和方法:这项19年的回顾性队列研究在韩国一家三级医院的风湿科进行,分析了313名新开始使用TNF-α抑制剂的成年AS患者。通过Naver地图应用程序计算了到医院的行驶距离、行驶时间和公共交通时间。TNF-α抑制剂的药物持续时间定义为从指标日期到停药日期之间不超过90天的治疗间隔时间。结果:AS患者最常使用的TNF-α抑制剂是阿达木单抗(69.3%),其次是依那西普(21.4%)和英夫利昔单抗(9.3%)。到医院的驾车距离、驾车时间和公共交通时间的中位数分别为16公里、0.6小时和0.8小时。总共有120例(38.3%)AS患者在67.1个月的中位随访期内停止使用TNF-α抑制剂。调整混杂因素后,每增加10公里至医院的驾车距离(风险比[HR]=1.09, p=0.017)和至医院的驾车距离≧16公里(HR=1.9, p=0.001)与TNF-α抑制剂停药风险增加显著相关。驾车时间和到医院的公共交通时间与TNF-α抑制剂的持久性均无显著相关。结论:较长的驾驶距离显著增加了治疗中断的风险,突出了卫生保健系统解决这些障碍的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of the Driving Distance, Driving Time, and Public Transit Time to the Hospital with the Persistence of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Research on the impact of geographical distance from or travel time to healthcare facilities on treatment adherence among patients with rheumatic diseases is lacking. Therefore, we investigated the association of the driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital with the persistence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Patients and methods: This 19-year retrospective cohort study was performed in the rheumatology department of a tertiary hospital in Korea and analyzed 313 adult patients with AS who were newly initiated on TNF-α inhibitors. The driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were calculated using the Naver Map application. Drug persistence of TNF-α inhibitors was defined as the time duration between the index date and the date of discontinuation without exceeding a treatment gap of 90 days.

Results: The most commonly prescribed TNF-α inhibitor in patients with AS was adalimumab (69.3%), followed by etanercept (21.4%) and infliximab (9.3%). The median driving distance, driving time, and public transit time to the hospital were 16 kilometers (km), 0.6 hours, and 0.8 hours, respectively. In total, 120 (38.3%) patients with AS stopped TNF-α inhibitors over a median follow-up period of 67.1 months. After adjusting confounding factors, the driving distance to the hospital per 10-km increase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.09, p=0.017) and the driving distance to hospital ≧16 km (HR=1.9, p=0.001) were significantly associated with a higher risk of TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation. Neither the driving time nor the public transit time to the hospital was significantly associated with TNF-α inhibitor persistence.

Conclusion: Longer driving distances significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation, highlighting the need for healthcare systems to address these barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信