Tingting Ji, Ting Long, Xiaodan Li, Zhifei Xu, Jing Zhao, Guixiang Wang, Hua Wang, Hongbin Li, Fengzhen Zhang, Li Zheng, Shengcai Wang, Xin Ni
{"title":"基于两种不同指南的儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停临床特征的比较研究。","authors":"Tingting Ji, Ting Long, Xiaodan Li, Zhifei Xu, Jing Zhao, Guixiang Wang, Hua Wang, Hongbin Li, Fengzhen Zhang, Li Zheng, Shengcai Wang, Xin Ni","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S484935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"17 ","pages":"329-341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Investigation on Clinical Characteristics in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Two Distinct Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Ji, Ting Long, Xiaodan Li, Zhifei Xu, Jing Zhao, Guixiang Wang, Hua Wang, Hongbin Li, Fengzhen Zhang, Li Zheng, Shengcai Wang, Xin Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/NSS.S484935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"329-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S484935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S484935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Investigation on Clinical Characteristics in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Two Distinct Guidelines.
Objective: To investigate the differences in assessment of clinical characteristics between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosed according to the 2007 and 2020 guidelines and those without OSA, together with the relationships between polysomnography (PSG) parameters and cognitive tests scores in preschool and school-aged children with OSA.
Methods: Eighty children were totally recruited and divided into OSA and non-OSA groups based on two distinct guidelines, with further subclassification into preschool and school-aged subgroups. Differences in PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores between groups and subgroups were analyzed and compared, followed by partial correlation analysis to determine the correlations between these characteristics.
Results: Compared to the 2007 guideline, the 2020 guideline demonstrated more significant between-group differences in clinical characteristics assessments, especially verbal intelligent quotient (VIQ). For preschool children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, there were significant differences in PSG parameters and Block Diagram between the two guidelines. Additionally, the 2007 guideline showed difference in Picture Vocabulary, where the 2020 guideline exhibited differences in performance IQ (PIQ) and Geometric Figure For school-aged children in the OSA and non-OSA subgroups, both guidelines showed significant differences in PSG parameters, full-scale IQ (FIQ) and Block Diagram. The 2007 guideline had significant differences in PIQ, while the 2020 guideline had difference in VIQ. Furthermore, significant correlations were observed between PSG parameters and cognitive tests scores across different subgroups.
Conclusion: The 2020 guideline has advantages in assessing the clinical characteristics of children with OSA, especially for verbal function, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
期刊介绍:
Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep.
Specific topics covered in the journal include:
The functions of sleep in humans and other animals
Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep
The genetics of sleep and sleep differences
The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness
Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness
Sleep changes with development and with age
Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause)
The science and nature of dreams
Sleep disorders
Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life
Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders
Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health)
The microbiome and sleep
Chronotherapy
Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health
Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally
Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health
Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption
Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms
Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.