新型炎症指标在熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆管炎中的应用价值。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S493132
Siqi Liu, Yongli Pang, Xiaoxi Wang, Ruihang Lin, Siqing Tunala
{"title":"新型炎症指标在熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆管炎中的应用价值。","authors":"Siqi Liu, Yongli Pang, Xiaoxi Wang, Ruihang Lin, Siqing Tunala","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S493132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the application value of novel inflammation indicators such as the lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) undergoing ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. We plan to further seek simple and convenient methods to assess the response of patients to UDCA treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded routine blood tests, liver function, and vitamin D (VD) levels of PBC patients and healthy controls visiting the hospital between October 2022 and October 2023. LMR, NLR, and PLR were calculated, and differences between the two groups were analyzed. PBC patients were divided into good response and poor response groups according to the Paris I criteria, and differences in laboratory tests between the two groups were analyzed. The predictive value of novel inflammation indicators in UDCA treatment response was further analyzed using ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LMR and VD levels were significantly lower in the PBC group compared to the control group (<i>P</i>=0.000, <i>P</i>=0.000). In PBC patients, the good response group had higher LMR than the poor response group (<i>P</i>=0.001) and lower NLR than the poor response group (<i>P</i>=0.015). The areas under the ROC curve for LMR and NLR were 0.682±0.049 and 0.630±0.052, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between PLR and VD in PBC patients (<i>r</i>=-0.252, <i>P</i>=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low LMR and high NLR may indicate poor treatment response. And PLR also have certain predictive values for treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"897-905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application Value of Novel Inflammatory Indicators in Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis.\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Liu, Yongli Pang, Xiaoxi Wang, Ruihang Lin, Siqing Tunala\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S493132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the application value of novel inflammation indicators such as the lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) undergoing ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. We plan to further seek simple and convenient methods to assess the response of patients to UDCA treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded routine blood tests, liver function, and vitamin D (VD) levels of PBC patients and healthy controls visiting the hospital between October 2022 and October 2023. LMR, NLR, and PLR were calculated, and differences between the two groups were analyzed. PBC patients were divided into good response and poor response groups according to the Paris I criteria, and differences in laboratory tests between the two groups were analyzed. The predictive value of novel inflammation indicators in UDCA treatment response was further analyzed using ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LMR and VD levels were significantly lower in the PBC group compared to the control group (<i>P</i>=0.000, <i>P</i>=0.000). In PBC patients, the good response group had higher LMR than the poor response group (<i>P</i>=0.001) and lower NLR than the poor response group (<i>P</i>=0.015). The areas under the ROC curve for LMR and NLR were 0.682±0.049 and 0.630±0.052, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between PLR and VD in PBC patients (<i>r</i>=-0.252, <i>P</i>=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low LMR and high NLR may indicate poor treatment response. And PLR also have certain predictive values for treatment response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"897-905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S493132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S493132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析新型炎症指标淋巴细胞/单核细胞比(LMR)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比(PLR)在熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)治疗原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)患者中的应用价值。我们计划进一步寻求简单方便的方法来评估患者对UDCA治疗的反应。方法:我们记录了2022年10月至2023年10月期间就诊的PBC患者和健康对照者的常规血液检查、肝功能和维生素D (VD)水平。计算LMR、NLR、PLR,并分析两组间差异。根据Paris I标准将PBC患者分为反应良好组和反应不良组,分析两组间实验室检查的差异。采用ROC分析进一步分析新型炎症指标对UDCA治疗反应的预测价值。结果:PBC组LMR和VD水平明显低于对照组(P=0.000, P=0.000)。在PBC患者中,良好反应组的LMR高于不良反应组(P=0.001), NLR低于不良反应组(P=0.015)。LMR和NLR的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.682±0.049和0.630±0.052。PBC患者PLR与VD呈显著负相关(r=-0.252, P=0.005)。结论:低LMR和高NLR可能提示治疗效果差。PLR对治疗反应也有一定的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application Value of Novel Inflammatory Indicators in Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Objective: To analyze the application value of novel inflammation indicators such as the lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) undergoing ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. We plan to further seek simple and convenient methods to assess the response of patients to UDCA treatment.

Methods: We recorded routine blood tests, liver function, and vitamin D (VD) levels of PBC patients and healthy controls visiting the hospital between October 2022 and October 2023. LMR, NLR, and PLR were calculated, and differences between the two groups were analyzed. PBC patients were divided into good response and poor response groups according to the Paris I criteria, and differences in laboratory tests between the two groups were analyzed. The predictive value of novel inflammation indicators in UDCA treatment response was further analyzed using ROC analysis.

Results: LMR and VD levels were significantly lower in the PBC group compared to the control group (P=0.000, P=0.000). In PBC patients, the good response group had higher LMR than the poor response group (P=0.001) and lower NLR than the poor response group (P=0.015). The areas under the ROC curve for LMR and NLR were 0.682±0.049 and 0.630±0.052, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between PLR and VD in PBC patients (r=-0.252, P=0.005).

Conclusion: Low LMR and high NLR may indicate poor treatment response. And PLR also have certain predictive values for treatment response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信