Jiajun Yuan, Changjie Du, Hongyu Wu, Tao Zhong, Qilong Zhai, Jialun Peng, Nan Liu, Jinzheng Li
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术后患者未能达到教科书结局的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiajun Yuan, Changjie Du, Hongyu Wu, Tao Zhong, Qilong Zhai, Jialun Peng, Nan Liu, Jinzheng Li","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) represents one of the most technically demanding surgical procedures, characterized by extensive surgical trauma and high perioperative morbidity. Single outcome measures are insufficient to comprehensively assess the surgical quality of PD. Textbook outcome (TO), as an integrated evaluation system incorporating multiple clinical parameters, offers an objective, reliable, and comprehensive assessment of surgical performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome (non-TO) following pancreatoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We systematically searched international databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Chinese Journals Service Platform, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed) for studies on risk factors of failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy from inception to 31 December 2024. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 5238 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among the 18 factors evaluated, five were significantly associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: preoperative biliary drainage (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.30-3.36], P = 0.002), smaller tumor size (OR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.02-1.81], P = 0.04), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 2.25, 95%CI [1.01-5.02], P = 0.05), small pancreatic duct diameter (OR = 2.30, 95%CI [1.62-3.28], P < 0.00001), and increased intraoperative blood loss (OR = 4.14, 95%CI [1.16-14.83], P = 0.03). The remaining 13 factors showed no significant association with failure to achieve textbook outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identified preoperative biliary drainage, tumor morphological characteristics (including size and texture), pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss as key factors affecting the achievement of textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. These findings may help surgeons identify high-risk patients for failure to achieve textbook outcome, enabling personalized surgical strategies and optimized perioperative management to improve textbook outcome rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3093-3106"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors of failure to achieve textbook outcome in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiajun Yuan, Changjie Du, Hongyu Wu, Tao Zhong, Qilong Zhai, Jialun Peng, Nan Liu, Jinzheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) represents one of the most technically demanding surgical procedures, characterized by extensive surgical trauma and high perioperative morbidity. Single outcome measures are insufficient to comprehensively assess the surgical quality of PD. Textbook outcome (TO), as an integrated evaluation system incorporating multiple clinical parameters, offers an objective, reliable, and comprehensive assessment of surgical performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome (non-TO) following pancreatoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We systematically searched international databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Chinese Journals Service Platform, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed) for studies on risk factors of failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy from inception to 31 December 2024. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 5238 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among the 18 factors evaluated, five were significantly associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: preoperative biliary drainage (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.30-3.36], P = 0.002), smaller tumor size (OR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.02-1.81], P = 0.04), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 2.25, 95%CI [1.01-5.02], P = 0.05), small pancreatic duct diameter (OR = 2.30, 95%CI [1.62-3.28], P < 0.00001), and increased intraoperative blood loss (OR = 4.14, 95%CI [1.16-14.83], P = 0.03). The remaining 13 factors showed no significant association with failure to achieve textbook outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identified preoperative biliary drainage, tumor morphological characteristics (including size and texture), pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss as key factors affecting the achievement of textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. These findings may help surgeons identify high-risk patients for failure to achieve textbook outcome, enabling personalized surgical strategies and optimized perioperative management to improve textbook outcome rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3093-3106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002299\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胰十二指肠切除术(PD)是技术要求最高的外科手术之一,其特点是手术创伤大,围手术期发病率高。单一结果指标不足以全面评价PD的手术质量。教科书结果(TO),作为一个综合评价系统,包括多个临床参数,提供客观,可靠,全面的评估手术表现。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定胰十二指肠切除术后未能达到教科书结局(非to)的相关危险因素。材料和方法:我们系统地检索了国际数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane Library)和中文数据库(中国国家知识基础设施、卫普中文期刊服务平台、万方数据、中国医学信息数据库),从开始到2024年12月31日,关于胰十二指肠切除术后未达到教科书结局的危险因素的研究。使用随机效应或固定效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs)。进行异质性检验、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了10项研究,涉及5238例患者。在评估的18个因素中,有5个因素与胰十二指肠切除术后未能达到标准结局显著相关:术前胆道引流(OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.30-3.36], P = 0.002)、肿瘤体积较小(OR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.02-1.81], P = 0.04)、胰腺质地柔软(OR = 2.25, 95%CI [1.01-5.02], P = 0.05)、胰管直径较小(OR = 2.30, 95%CI [1.62-3.28], P < 0.00001)、术中出血量增加(OR = 4.14, 95%CI [1.16-14.83], P = 0.03)。其余13个因素显示与未能达到教科书结果无显著关联。结论:本荟萃分析确定术前胆道引流、肿瘤形态特征(包括大小和质地)、胰管直径和术中出血量是影响胰十二指肠切除术后达到标准预后的关键因素。这些发现可以帮助外科医生识别未能达到教科书预后的高危患者,从而实现个性化的手术策略和优化的围手术期管理,以提高教科书预后率。
Risk factors of failure to achieve textbook outcome in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) represents one of the most technically demanding surgical procedures, characterized by extensive surgical trauma and high perioperative morbidity. Single outcome measures are insufficient to comprehensively assess the surgical quality of PD. Textbook outcome (TO), as an integrated evaluation system incorporating multiple clinical parameters, offers an objective, reliable, and comprehensive assessment of surgical performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome (non-TO) following pancreatoduodenectomy.
Materials and methods: We systematically searched international databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Chinese Journals Service Platform, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed) for studies on risk factors of failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy from inception to 31 December 2024. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were conducted.
Results: Ten studies involving 5238 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among the 18 factors evaluated, five were significantly associated with failure to achieve textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: preoperative biliary drainage (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.30-3.36], P = 0.002), smaller tumor size (OR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.02-1.81], P = 0.04), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 2.25, 95%CI [1.01-5.02], P = 0.05), small pancreatic duct diameter (OR = 2.30, 95%CI [1.62-3.28], P < 0.00001), and increased intraoperative blood loss (OR = 4.14, 95%CI [1.16-14.83], P = 0.03). The remaining 13 factors showed no significant association with failure to achieve textbook outcome.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified preoperative biliary drainage, tumor morphological characteristics (including size and texture), pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss as key factors affecting the achievement of textbook outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. These findings may help surgeons identify high-risk patients for failure to achieve textbook outcome, enabling personalized surgical strategies and optimized perioperative management to improve textbook outcome rates.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.