后covid -19时代儿童耐药肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特点及治疗结果

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S502937
Qin Sun, Jindou Hao, Qixin Zhou, Yongmei Zeng
{"title":"后covid -19时代儿童耐药肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特点及治疗结果","authors":"Qin Sun, Jindou Hao, Qixin Zhou, Yongmei Zeng","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S502937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> pneumonia (MPP) is a prevalent disease among children. Typically, macrolides are the first-line treatment for MPP in China. However, the number of cases resistant to macrolides has been rising, especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has further complicated the clinical management of macrolide-unresponsive <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> pneumonia (MUMPP) in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the clinical characteristics of MUMPP and the effects of various treatments on children with MUMPP during March 2023 to February 2024 in southern China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at a university-affiliated hospital in southern China. Patients were categorized based on their response to macrolide treatment into two groups: MUMPP and control group. The study included 549 pediatric patients. Of these, 297 were in the MUMPP group and 252 were in the control group. This categorization allowed us to compare clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators between the groups. The MUMPP group received one of the three treatments: combined antibiotics, additional steroids, or a switch to doxycycline. Subsequently, we analyzed differences in clinical outcomes, which included hospital stay, hospital cost, and recovery time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in gender or pre-admission disease duration between the MUMPP and control group (P>0.05). However, subjects in MUMPP group was older, had longer fever durations, extended hospital stays, higher medical costs, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, IL-6, and γ-IFN. All of which showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Within the MUMPP group, patients switched to doxycycline had the shortest hospital stay and recovery time, significantly differing from those in other treatment groups (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children in the MUMPP group exhibited higher inflammatory indicators than the control group. The early adaptation of treatment strategies, particularly the switch to doxycycline, is associated with improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"957-963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Drug-Resistant <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> Pneumonia in the Post-COVID-19 Era.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Sun, Jindou Hao, Qixin Zhou, Yongmei Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IDR.S502937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> pneumonia (MPP) is a prevalent disease among children. Typically, macrolides are the first-line treatment for MPP in China. However, the number of cases resistant to macrolides has been rising, especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has further complicated the clinical management of macrolide-unresponsive <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> pneumonia (MUMPP) in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the clinical characteristics of MUMPP and the effects of various treatments on children with MUMPP during March 2023 to February 2024 in southern China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at a university-affiliated hospital in southern China. Patients were categorized based on their response to macrolide treatment into two groups: MUMPP and control group. The study included 549 pediatric patients. Of these, 297 were in the MUMPP group and 252 were in the control group. This categorization allowed us to compare clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators between the groups. The MUMPP group received one of the three treatments: combined antibiotics, additional steroids, or a switch to doxycycline. Subsequently, we analyzed differences in clinical outcomes, which included hospital stay, hospital cost, and recovery time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in gender or pre-admission disease duration between the MUMPP and control group (P>0.05). However, subjects in MUMPP group was older, had longer fever durations, extended hospital stays, higher medical costs, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, IL-6, and γ-IFN. All of which showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Within the MUMPP group, patients switched to doxycycline had the shortest hospital stay and recovery time, significantly differing from those in other treatment groups (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children in the MUMPP group exhibited higher inflammatory indicators than the control group. The early adaptation of treatment strategies, particularly the switch to doxycycline, is associated with improved clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"957-963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846524/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S502937\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S502937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺炎支原体肺炎(MPP)是儿童常见病。在中国,大环内酯类药物通常是MPP的一线治疗药物。然而,对大环内酯类药物耐药的病例数一直在上升,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发后,这进一步复杂化了儿童大环内酯类药物无反应肺炎支原体肺炎(MUMPP)的临床管理。目的:研究2023年3月至2024年2月华南地区流行性腮腺炎(MUMPP)患儿的临床特点及不同治疗方法的疗效。方法:在中国南方某大学附属医院进行回顾性病例对照研究。根据患者对大环内酯治疗的反应将患者分为两组:MUMPP组和对照组。该研究包括549名儿科患者。其中,297人在MUMPP组,252人在对照组。这种分类使我们能够比较两组之间的临床特征和实验室指标。MUMPP组接受了三种治疗中的一种:联合抗生素、额外的类固醇或改用强力霉素。随后,我们分析了临床结果的差异,包括住院时间、住院费用和恢复时间。结果:MUMPP组与对照组在性别、入院前病程方面无显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,MUMPP组受试者年龄较大,发热时间较长,住院时间较长,医疗费用较高,c反应蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、IL-6和γ-IFN水平升高。结论:MUMPP组患儿炎症指标高于对照组。早期适应治疗策略,特别是转向强力霉素,与改善临床结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Drug-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in the Post-COVID-19 Era.

Background: Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) is a prevalent disease among children. Typically, macrolides are the first-line treatment for MPP in China. However, the number of cases resistant to macrolides has been rising, especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has further complicated the clinical management of macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MUMPP) in children.

Objective: This study examined the clinical characteristics of MUMPP and the effects of various treatments on children with MUMPP during March 2023 to February 2024 in southern China.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at a university-affiliated hospital in southern China. Patients were categorized based on their response to macrolide treatment into two groups: MUMPP and control group. The study included 549 pediatric patients. Of these, 297 were in the MUMPP group and 252 were in the control group. This categorization allowed us to compare clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators between the groups. The MUMPP group received one of the three treatments: combined antibiotics, additional steroids, or a switch to doxycycline. Subsequently, we analyzed differences in clinical outcomes, which included hospital stay, hospital cost, and recovery time.

Results: No significant differences were found in gender or pre-admission disease duration between the MUMPP and control group (P>0.05). However, subjects in MUMPP group was older, had longer fever durations, extended hospital stays, higher medical costs, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, IL-6, and γ-IFN. All of which showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Within the MUMPP group, patients switched to doxycycline had the shortest hospital stay and recovery time, significantly differing from those in other treatment groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Children in the MUMPP group exhibited higher inflammatory indicators than the control group. The early adaptation of treatment strategies, particularly the switch to doxycycline, is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信