肺动脉高压主肺动脉直径的预后价值

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.012
Jacob Y Cao, Rita-Maria Abdo, Nelson Wang, Nicholas Olsen, Kate Kearney, Kirby Wong, Edmund Lau, David Celermajer, Eugene Kotlyar, Rachael Cordina
{"title":"肺动脉高压主肺动脉直径的预后价值","authors":"Jacob Y Cao, Rita-Maria Abdo, Nelson Wang, Nicholas Olsen, Kate Kearney, Kirby Wong, Edmund Lau, David Celermajer, Eugene Kotlyar, Rachael Cordina","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate risk stratification is critical aspect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management. It is unclear whether main pulmonary artery (MPA) enlargement offers additional prognostic value to validated risk scores.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Is MPA diameter prognostic in PAH, independent of the existing risk scores?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients with PAH from 2 large referral centers was conducted. Baseline Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, and European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society scores were calculated. The primary end points were composite death, lung transplantation, and right heart failure hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards models were used for time-to-event analyses. Receiver operator characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses additionally assessed the prognostic value of MPA diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-one patients were included. Baseline mean (SD) MPA diameter was 35.3 (7.1) mm. MPA grew by a mean (SD) of 0.4 (1.1) mm/y (1.1% baseline diameter). Over a mean (SD) of 4.0 (3.4) years of follow-up, 190 primary events occurred, and MPA diameter was a predictor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06/mm; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07/mm; P < .001). MPA diameter remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustments for the 3 risk scores and their individual components. MPA growth rate also predicted the outcome (HR, 1.79/mm/y; 95% CI, 1.52-2.11/mm/y; P < .001), independent of baseline MPA diameter. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the risk of the primary end point at 1 year was similar for MPA alone (0.72) compared with the 3 risk scores (0.72-0.75). Furthermore, using MPA in addition to REVEAL 2.0 score resulted in risk reclassification in 23% of patients, mostly because of appropriate risk downgrading.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MPA diameter is a significant independent predictor of adverse clinical events in patients with PAH without congenital heart disease. It may be a novel prognostic marker in addition to the existing risk scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of Main Pulmonary Artery Diameter in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Y Cao, Rita-Maria Abdo, Nelson Wang, Nicholas Olsen, Kate Kearney, Kirby Wong, Edmund Lau, David Celermajer, Eugene Kotlyar, Rachael Cordina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate risk stratification is critical aspect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management. It is unclear whether main pulmonary artery (MPA) enlargement offers additional prognostic value to validated risk scores.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Is MPA diameter prognostic in PAH, independent of the existing risk scores?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients with PAH from 2 large referral centers was conducted. Baseline Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, and European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society scores were calculated. The primary end points were composite death, lung transplantation, and right heart failure hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards models were used for time-to-event analyses. Receiver operator characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses additionally assessed the prognostic value of MPA diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-one patients were included. Baseline mean (SD) MPA diameter was 35.3 (7.1) mm. MPA grew by a mean (SD) of 0.4 (1.1) mm/y (1.1% baseline diameter). Over a mean (SD) of 4.0 (3.4) years of follow-up, 190 primary events occurred, and MPA diameter was a predictor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06/mm; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07/mm; P < .001). MPA diameter remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustments for the 3 risk scores and their individual components. MPA growth rate also predicted the outcome (HR, 1.79/mm/y; 95% CI, 1.52-2.11/mm/y; P < .001), independent of baseline MPA diameter. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the risk of the primary end point at 1 year was similar for MPA alone (0.72) compared with the 3 risk scores (0.72-0.75). Furthermore, using MPA in addition to REVEAL 2.0 score resulted in risk reclassification in 23% of patients, mostly because of appropriate risk downgrading.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MPA diameter is a significant independent predictor of adverse clinical events in patients with PAH without congenital heart disease. It may be a novel prognostic marker in addition to the existing risk scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确的风险分层是肺动脉高压(PAH)管理的关键方面。目前尚不清楚肺动脉(MPA)扩张是否为风险评分提供了额外的预后价值。研究问题:独立于现有的风险评分,MPA直径是否与PAH预后有关?研究设计和方法:对来自两个大型转诊中心的PAH患者进行回顾性研究。计算基线REVEAL 2.0、REVEAL Lite 2和ESC/ERS评分。主要终点为复合死亡、肺移植和右心衰住院。Cox比例风险模型用于时间-事件分析。接受者-操作者特征和净重分类改进分析还评估了MPA直径的预后价值。结果:共纳入351例患者。基线MPA直径为35.3±7.1 mm。MPA增长0.4±1.1 mm/年(1.1%基线直径)。在平均4.0±3.4年的随访中,发生了190起原发事件,MPA直径是一个预测因子(HR 1.06 / mm, 95% CI 1.04-1.07)。解释:MPA直径是无先天性心脏病的PAH患者不良临床事件的重要独立预测因子。除了现有的风险评分外,它可能是一种新的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Value of Main Pulmonary Artery Diameter in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Background: Accurate risk stratification is critical aspect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management. It is unclear whether main pulmonary artery (MPA) enlargement offers additional prognostic value to validated risk scores.

Research question: Is MPA diameter prognostic in PAH, independent of the existing risk scores?

Study design and methods: A retrospective review of patients with PAH from 2 large referral centers was conducted. Baseline Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, and European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society scores were calculated. The primary end points were composite death, lung transplantation, and right heart failure hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards models were used for time-to-event analyses. Receiver operator characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses additionally assessed the prognostic value of MPA diameter.

Results: Three hundred fifty-one patients were included. Baseline mean (SD) MPA diameter was 35.3 (7.1) mm. MPA grew by a mean (SD) of 0.4 (1.1) mm/y (1.1% baseline diameter). Over a mean (SD) of 4.0 (3.4) years of follow-up, 190 primary events occurred, and MPA diameter was a predictor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06/mm; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07/mm; P < .001). MPA diameter remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustments for the 3 risk scores and their individual components. MPA growth rate also predicted the outcome (HR, 1.79/mm/y; 95% CI, 1.52-2.11/mm/y; P < .001), independent of baseline MPA diameter. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the risk of the primary end point at 1 year was similar for MPA alone (0.72) compared with the 3 risk scores (0.72-0.75). Furthermore, using MPA in addition to REVEAL 2.0 score resulted in risk reclassification in 23% of patients, mostly because of appropriate risk downgrading.

Interpretation: MPA diameter is a significant independent predictor of adverse clinical events in patients with PAH without congenital heart disease. It may be a novel prognostic marker in addition to the existing risk scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信