第二心脏辅助耳语经皮机械循环支持装置的体外溶血评价。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Chris H H Chan, Asma Farooqui, Preston Peak, Yaxin Wang, Sai Kode, Hadeel Al-Sahli, Zvonimir Krajcer, Sejal Chaudhari, Alex Richardson, Leslie Miller
{"title":"第二心脏辅助耳语经皮机械循环支持装置的体外溶血评价。","authors":"Chris H H Chan, Asma Farooqui, Preston Peak, Yaxin Wang, Sai Kode, Hadeel Al-Sahli, Zvonimir Krajcer, Sejal Chaudhari, Alex Richardson, Leslie Miller","doi":"10.1111/aor.14979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rotational pump speeds in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices frequently result in hemolysis. Consequently, in vitro hemolysis testing for newly developed devices is essential to mitigate this significant risk. This study compared the degree of hemolysis induced by the Second Heart Assist Whisper pMCS at its maximum pump speed, representing the worst-case scenario, with that of the Impella CP, following American society for testing and materials standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five Whisper devices were tested at 10000 RPM, while a comparator Impella CP was operated at 44 133 ± 606 RPM to match the Whisper's flow rate. Both devices were evaluated in two identical in vitro blood circulatory loops using citrated bovine blood. Hemolysis was analyzed by the tetramethylbenzidine method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change in plasma free hemoglobin (ΔpfHb) was significantly greater with the Impella CP than with the Whisper (p < 0.01). Both devices caused a steady increase in pfHb, with significant differences after 60 min of in vitro testing (p < 0.01). The Whisper and Impella CP differed significantly in normalized index of hemolysis (0.088 ± 0.022 vs. 0.194 ± 0.029 g/100, p < 0.01) and modified index of hemolysis (9.72 ± 2.4 vs. 20.83 ± 3.5, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Whisper exhibited superior hemolytic performance to that of the Impella CP under identical hemodynamic conditions. Our newly designed blood circulatory loop and these benchmark values will aid future in vitro hemolysis testing for pMCS devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Hemolysis Evaluation of the Second Heart Assist Whisper Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Device.\",\"authors\":\"Chris H H Chan, Asma Farooqui, Preston Peak, Yaxin Wang, Sai Kode, Hadeel Al-Sahli, Zvonimir Krajcer, Sejal Chaudhari, Alex Richardson, Leslie Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rotational pump speeds in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices frequently result in hemolysis. Consequently, in vitro hemolysis testing for newly developed devices is essential to mitigate this significant risk. This study compared the degree of hemolysis induced by the Second Heart Assist Whisper pMCS at its maximum pump speed, representing the worst-case scenario, with that of the Impella CP, following American society for testing and materials standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five Whisper devices were tested at 10000 RPM, while a comparator Impella CP was operated at 44 133 ± 606 RPM to match the Whisper's flow rate. Both devices were evaluated in two identical in vitro blood circulatory loops using citrated bovine blood. Hemolysis was analyzed by the tetramethylbenzidine method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change in plasma free hemoglobin (ΔpfHb) was significantly greater with the Impella CP than with the Whisper (p < 0.01). Both devices caused a steady increase in pfHb, with significant differences after 60 min of in vitro testing (p < 0.01). The Whisper and Impella CP differed significantly in normalized index of hemolysis (0.088 ± 0.022 vs. 0.194 ± 0.029 g/100, p < 0.01) and modified index of hemolysis (9.72 ± 2.4 vs. 20.83 ± 3.5, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Whisper exhibited superior hemolytic performance to that of the Impella CP under identical hemodynamic conditions. Our newly designed blood circulatory loop and these benchmark values will aid future in vitro hemolysis testing for pMCS devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14979\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高转速泵在经皮机械循环支持(pMCS)装置经常导致溶血。因此,对新开发的设备进行体外溶血测试对于减轻这一重大风险至关重要。本研究比较了Second Heart Assist Whisper pMCS在最大泵速下(代表最坏情况)与Impella CP(遵循美国社会测试和材料标准)诱导的溶血程度。方法:在10000 RPM的转速下测试5个Whisper装置,同时在44 133±606 RPM的转速下运行一个比较器Impella CP,以匹配Whisper的流速。这两种装置在使用柠檬酸牛血液的两个相同的体外血液循环循环中进行了评估。采用四甲基联苯胺法分析溶血情况。结果:血浆游离血红蛋白(ΔpfHb)随Impella CP的变化明显大于Whisper (p)。结论:在相同的血流动力学条件下,Whisper的溶血性能优于Impella CP。我们新设计的血液循环回路和这些基准值将有助于未来pMCS设备的体外溶血测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Hemolysis Evaluation of the Second Heart Assist Whisper Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Device.

Background: High rotational pump speeds in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices frequently result in hemolysis. Consequently, in vitro hemolysis testing for newly developed devices is essential to mitigate this significant risk. This study compared the degree of hemolysis induced by the Second Heart Assist Whisper pMCS at its maximum pump speed, representing the worst-case scenario, with that of the Impella CP, following American society for testing and materials standards.

Methods: Five Whisper devices were tested at 10000 RPM, while a comparator Impella CP was operated at 44 133 ± 606 RPM to match the Whisper's flow rate. Both devices were evaluated in two identical in vitro blood circulatory loops using citrated bovine blood. Hemolysis was analyzed by the tetramethylbenzidine method.

Results: The change in plasma free hemoglobin (ΔpfHb) was significantly greater with the Impella CP than with the Whisper (p < 0.01). Both devices caused a steady increase in pfHb, with significant differences after 60 min of in vitro testing (p < 0.01). The Whisper and Impella CP differed significantly in normalized index of hemolysis (0.088 ± 0.022 vs. 0.194 ± 0.029 g/100, p < 0.01) and modified index of hemolysis (9.72 ± 2.4 vs. 20.83 ± 3.5, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The Whisper exhibited superior hemolytic performance to that of the Impella CP under identical hemodynamic conditions. Our newly designed blood circulatory loop and these benchmark values will aid future in vitro hemolysis testing for pMCS devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信