转移焦点:从皮肤病学角度探讨幸福对健康的影响

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Flora Balieva
{"title":"转移焦点:从皮肤病学角度探讨幸福对健康的影响","authors":"Flora Balieva","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Happiness is under-researched in medicine. The World Happiness Report highlights the role of societal factors: income equality, social freedom and healthcare access in influencing population-level happiness.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The majority of dermatological research focuses on disability indices such as impairment in mental health, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), economic burden and other negative measurements that impair well-being. In this issue of the JEADV, Ziehfreund, Wecker et al. present their study<span><sup>2</sup></span> in which they chose to adopt a positive perspective, exploring happiness as the key health outcome. The authors investigated happiness in 1039 patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p>The study employs a combination of subjective self-assessments using standardized instruments (Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), subjective well-being with the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), a heuristic happiness single item scale and self-assessed disease severity) as well as objective clinical measures of disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]) to integrate diverse data, which were then used to perform quantile regression. This approach offers valuable insights into the factors influencing happiness across a spectrum of experiences.</p><p>The authors selected their measurements based on prior existing publications and their own experience in the field, ensuring that results could be compared across studies and patient groups. Furthermore, the participants were recruited from eight European countries, providing insights into geographical differences in happiness levels and their relationship with dermatological health. This broad scope is a valuable contribution to cross-cultural research in dermatology.</p><p>Patients with AD reported greater impairment in HRQoL compared to patients with psoriasis. The authors attribute this difference to symptoms such as itch and fatigue. However, fatigue is more explored in psoriasis, while tiredness in AD is more likely to result from sleep loss due to severe itching.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Another reason for lower experienced happiness in patients with AD may be due to psoriasis patients having had access to effective biological treatments, available since the early 2000s, whereas similar treatments for AD have only recently become available.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The last two decades have offered psoriasis patients considerably better improvement in symptoms than for patients with AD, thus a different patient journey. In the study by Ziehfreund, Wecker et al.,<span><sup>2</sup></span> patients with AD exhibited more severe disease symptoms than patients with psoriasis, and current or previous use of systemic treatments was linked to higher happiness scores in some quantiles. These findings underscore the importance of adequate medical management in improving patient happiness.</p><p>Among the various outcomes, the disparity in happiness was most pronounced between the eight participating countries (Austria, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Malta, Germany, Portugal and Romania). Happiness levels were highest in Austria and Italy, potentially reflecting better healthcare access or societal factors. In contrast, Poland, Romania and Ukraine exhibited lower scores, suggesting disparities in treatment availability or cultural attitudes towards visible skin conditions. However, there were significant differences in the number of patients from each country, ranging from 23 (Romania, 7 with AD) to 256 (Austria, 91 with AD), making some comparisons less robust. Nevertheless, these results align with known differences in health policies and treatment access across European countries.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>The study largely focuses on European populations and two chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Expanding research to include diverse global contexts and a broader range of dermatological conditions could generate knowledge to enhance well-being, satisfaction with life and happiness. This study represents a significant step forward in understanding the interplay between dermatological health and subjective well-being, shifting the focus from traditional impairment metrics to positive psychological constructs such as happiness.</p><p>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"39 3","pages":"455-456"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdv.20536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting the focus: Exploring happiness as a health outcome in dermatology\",\"authors\":\"Flora Balieva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jdv.20536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Happiness is under-researched in medicine. The World Happiness Report highlights the role of societal factors: income equality, social freedom and healthcare access in influencing population-level happiness.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The majority of dermatological research focuses on disability indices such as impairment in mental health, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), economic burden and other negative measurements that impair well-being. In this issue of the JEADV, Ziehfreund, Wecker et al. present their study<span><sup>2</sup></span> in which they chose to adopt a positive perspective, exploring happiness as the key health outcome. The authors investigated happiness in 1039 patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p>The study employs a combination of subjective self-assessments using standardized instruments (Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), subjective well-being with the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), a heuristic happiness single item scale and self-assessed disease severity) as well as objective clinical measures of disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]) to integrate diverse data, which were then used to perform quantile regression. This approach offers valuable insights into the factors influencing happiness across a spectrum of experiences.</p><p>The authors selected their measurements based on prior existing publications and their own experience in the field, ensuring that results could be compared across studies and patient groups. Furthermore, the participants were recruited from eight European countries, providing insights into geographical differences in happiness levels and their relationship with dermatological health. This broad scope is a valuable contribution to cross-cultural research in dermatology.</p><p>Patients with AD reported greater impairment in HRQoL compared to patients with psoriasis. The authors attribute this difference to symptoms such as itch and fatigue. However, fatigue is more explored in psoriasis, while tiredness in AD is more likely to result from sleep loss due to severe itching.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Another reason for lower experienced happiness in patients with AD may be due to psoriasis patients having had access to effective biological treatments, available since the early 2000s, whereas similar treatments for AD have only recently become available.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The last two decades have offered psoriasis patients considerably better improvement in symptoms than for patients with AD, thus a different patient journey. In the study by Ziehfreund, Wecker et al.,<span><sup>2</sup></span> patients with AD exhibited more severe disease symptoms than patients with psoriasis, and current or previous use of systemic treatments was linked to higher happiness scores in some quantiles. These findings underscore the importance of adequate medical management in improving patient happiness.</p><p>Among the various outcomes, the disparity in happiness was most pronounced between the eight participating countries (Austria, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Malta, Germany, Portugal and Romania). Happiness levels were highest in Austria and Italy, potentially reflecting better healthcare access or societal factors. In contrast, Poland, Romania and Ukraine exhibited lower scores, suggesting disparities in treatment availability or cultural attitudes towards visible skin conditions. However, there were significant differences in the number of patients from each country, ranging from 23 (Romania, 7 with AD) to 256 (Austria, 91 with AD), making some comparisons less robust. Nevertheless, these results align with known differences in health policies and treatment access across European countries.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>The study largely focuses on European populations and two chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Expanding research to include diverse global contexts and a broader range of dermatological conditions could generate knowledge to enhance well-being, satisfaction with life and happiness. This study represents a significant step forward in understanding the interplay between dermatological health and subjective well-being, shifting the focus from traditional impairment metrics to positive psychological constructs such as happiness.</p><p>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"455-456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdv.20536\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.20536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学上对幸福的研究不足。《世界幸福报告》强调了收入平等、社会自由和获得医疗保健等社会因素在影响人口幸福水平方面的作用大多数皮肤病学研究的重点是残疾指数,如精神健康受损、与健康有关的生活质量下降、经济负担和其他损害福祉的负面衡量标准。在这一期的JEADV中,Ziehfreund, Wecker等人展示了他们的研究,他们选择采用积极的观点,探索幸福作为关键的健康结果。作者调查了1039名牛皮癣和特应性皮炎(AD)患者的幸福感。本研究采用标准化的主观自我评估工具(皮肤生活质量指数(DLQI)、生活满意度量表(SWLS)、主观幸福感与积极和消极体验量表(SPANE)、启发式幸福感单项量表和自评疾病严重程度)以及客观的疾病严重程度临床测量方法(银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI]和特应性皮炎评分[SCORAD])相结合,整合多种数据。然后使用它们进行分位数回归。这种方法对一系列经历中影响幸福的因素提供了有价值的见解。作者根据先前的现有出版物和他们自己在该领域的经验选择了他们的测量方法,确保结果可以在研究和患者群体之间进行比较。此外,参与者是从八个欧洲国家招募来的,从而深入了解了幸福水平的地理差异及其与皮肤健康的关系。这种广泛的研究范围是对皮肤病学跨文化研究的宝贵贡献。与牛皮癣患者相比,AD患者报告的HRQoL损害更大。作者将这种差异归因于瘙痒和疲劳等症状。然而,牛皮癣患者更容易出现疲劳,而AD患者的疲劳更可能是由于严重瘙痒导致睡眠不足造成的AD患者幸福感较低的另一个原因可能是牛皮癣患者可以获得有效的生物治疗,自21世纪初以来,而AD的类似治疗直到最近才可用在过去的二十年里,牛皮癣患者的症状比AD患者有了明显的改善,因此患者的旅程是不同的。在Ziehfreund, Wecker等人的研究中,AD患者比牛皮癣患者表现出更严重的疾病症状,并且在某些分位数中,当前或以前使用的全身治疗与更高的幸福得分有关。这些发现强调了充分的医疗管理对提高患者幸福感的重要性。在各种结果中,八个参与调查的国家(奥地利、波兰、意大利、乌克兰、马耳他、德国、葡萄牙和罗马尼亚)之间的幸福感差异最为明显。奥地利和意大利的幸福指数最高,这可能反映了更好的医疗服务或社会因素。相比之下,波兰、罗马尼亚和乌克兰的得分较低,这表明在治疗可用性或对可见皮肤状况的文化态度上存在差异。然而,来自每个国家的患者数量存在显著差异,从23人(罗马尼亚,7人患有阿尔茨海默病)到256人(奥地利,91人患有阿尔茨海默病),使得一些比较不那么可靠。然而,这些结果与欧洲各国在卫生政策和治疗可及性方面的已知差异相符。这项研究主要集中在欧洲人群和两种慢性炎症性皮肤病上。扩大研究范围,使其包括不同的全球背景和更广泛的皮肤病,可以产生知识,以提高福祉、对生活的满意度和幸福感。这项研究在理解皮肤健康和主观幸福感之间的相互作用方面迈出了重要的一步,将重点从传统的损伤指标转移到积极的心理结构,如幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shifting the focus: Exploring happiness as a health outcome in dermatology

Happiness is under-researched in medicine. The World Happiness Report highlights the role of societal factors: income equality, social freedom and healthcare access in influencing population-level happiness.1 The majority of dermatological research focuses on disability indices such as impairment in mental health, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), economic burden and other negative measurements that impair well-being. In this issue of the JEADV, Ziehfreund, Wecker et al. present their study2 in which they chose to adopt a positive perspective, exploring happiness as the key health outcome. The authors investigated happiness in 1039 patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD).

The study employs a combination of subjective self-assessments using standardized instruments (Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), subjective well-being with the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), a heuristic happiness single item scale and self-assessed disease severity) as well as objective clinical measures of disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]) to integrate diverse data, which were then used to perform quantile regression. This approach offers valuable insights into the factors influencing happiness across a spectrum of experiences.

The authors selected their measurements based on prior existing publications and their own experience in the field, ensuring that results could be compared across studies and patient groups. Furthermore, the participants were recruited from eight European countries, providing insights into geographical differences in happiness levels and their relationship with dermatological health. This broad scope is a valuable contribution to cross-cultural research in dermatology.

Patients with AD reported greater impairment in HRQoL compared to patients with psoriasis. The authors attribute this difference to symptoms such as itch and fatigue. However, fatigue is more explored in psoriasis, while tiredness in AD is more likely to result from sleep loss due to severe itching.3 Another reason for lower experienced happiness in patients with AD may be due to psoriasis patients having had access to effective biological treatments, available since the early 2000s, whereas similar treatments for AD have only recently become available.4 The last two decades have offered psoriasis patients considerably better improvement in symptoms than for patients with AD, thus a different patient journey. In the study by Ziehfreund, Wecker et al.,2 patients with AD exhibited more severe disease symptoms than patients with psoriasis, and current or previous use of systemic treatments was linked to higher happiness scores in some quantiles. These findings underscore the importance of adequate medical management in improving patient happiness.

Among the various outcomes, the disparity in happiness was most pronounced between the eight participating countries (Austria, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Malta, Germany, Portugal and Romania). Happiness levels were highest in Austria and Italy, potentially reflecting better healthcare access or societal factors. In contrast, Poland, Romania and Ukraine exhibited lower scores, suggesting disparities in treatment availability or cultural attitudes towards visible skin conditions. However, there were significant differences in the number of patients from each country, ranging from 23 (Romania, 7 with AD) to 256 (Austria, 91 with AD), making some comparisons less robust. Nevertheless, these results align with known differences in health policies and treatment access across European countries.5

The study largely focuses on European populations and two chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Expanding research to include diverse global contexts and a broader range of dermatological conditions could generate knowledge to enhance well-being, satisfaction with life and happiness. This study represents a significant step forward in understanding the interplay between dermatological health and subjective well-being, shifting the focus from traditional impairment metrics to positive psychological constructs such as happiness.

None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信