Deborah Bochert, Sabine Hofer, Peter Dechent, Jens Frahm, Mathias Bähr, Jan Liman, Ilko Maier
{"title":"颈动脉狭窄患者的实时相衬MRI血流速度测定","authors":"Deborah Bochert, Sabine Hofer, Peter Dechent, Jens Frahm, Mathias Bähr, Jan Liman, Ilko Maier","doi":"10.1111/jon.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Real-time phase-contrast (RT-PC) flow MRI can be used to determine quantitative flow parameters throughout the vessel lumen of extracranial, brain-supplying arteries. Its potential value in the diagnostic workup of patients with carotid artery stenosis has not been evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>RT-PC flow MRI was performed in 10 patients with carotid stenosis in comparison to conventional neurovascular ultrasound (nvUS). Peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean flow velocity, and flow volumes have been evaluated by RT-PC flow MRI. Measurements have been performed at standardized sites along the common, internal, and external carotid arteries on both sides and at the maximum of the carotid stenosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Blood flow velocities were significantly lower with RT-PC flow MRI compared to nvUS and not consistently correlated between both methods. Within the maximum of the carotid stenosis, RT-PC flow MRI showed implausible flow velocity reductions compared to nvUS. In contrast, the flow volumes determined by RT-PC flow MRI—with exception of the stenosis maximum—were comparable with nvUS and significantly correlated in the prestenotic common carotid artery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>RT-PC flow MRI does not appear to be suitable for quantifying blood flow velocities and volumes in the patients with carotid stenosis compared to nvUS. Apart from the lower temporal resolution of RT-PC MRI, the lack of correlation of blood flow velocities might be ascribed to the prevalence of nonlaminar flow within and behind the stenosis, which violates a general prerequisite for valid flow velocity measurements by PC MRI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood Flow Velocities as Determined by Real-Time Phase-Contrast MRI in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Bochert, Sabine Hofer, Peter Dechent, Jens Frahm, Mathias Bähr, Jan Liman, Ilko Maier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Real-time phase-contrast (RT-PC) flow MRI can be used to determine quantitative flow parameters throughout the vessel lumen of extracranial, brain-supplying arteries. Its potential value in the diagnostic workup of patients with carotid artery stenosis has not been evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>RT-PC flow MRI was performed in 10 patients with carotid stenosis in comparison to conventional neurovascular ultrasound (nvUS). Peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean flow velocity, and flow volumes have been evaluated by RT-PC flow MRI. Measurements have been performed at standardized sites along the common, internal, and external carotid arteries on both sides and at the maximum of the carotid stenosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Blood flow velocities were significantly lower with RT-PC flow MRI compared to nvUS and not consistently correlated between both methods. Within the maximum of the carotid stenosis, RT-PC flow MRI showed implausible flow velocity reductions compared to nvUS. In contrast, the flow volumes determined by RT-PC flow MRI—with exception of the stenosis maximum—were comparable with nvUS and significantly correlated in the prestenotic common carotid artery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>RT-PC flow MRI does not appear to be suitable for quantifying blood flow velocities and volumes in the patients with carotid stenosis compared to nvUS. Apart from the lower temporal resolution of RT-PC MRI, the lack of correlation of blood flow velocities might be ascribed to the prevalence of nonlaminar flow within and behind the stenosis, which violates a general prerequisite for valid flow velocity measurements by PC MRI.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.70016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.70016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blood Flow Velocities as Determined by Real-Time Phase-Contrast MRI in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis
Background and Purpose
Real-time phase-contrast (RT-PC) flow MRI can be used to determine quantitative flow parameters throughout the vessel lumen of extracranial, brain-supplying arteries. Its potential value in the diagnostic workup of patients with carotid artery stenosis has not been evaluated.
Methods
RT-PC flow MRI was performed in 10 patients with carotid stenosis in comparison to conventional neurovascular ultrasound (nvUS). Peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean flow velocity, and flow volumes have been evaluated by RT-PC flow MRI. Measurements have been performed at standardized sites along the common, internal, and external carotid arteries on both sides and at the maximum of the carotid stenosis.
Results
Blood flow velocities were significantly lower with RT-PC flow MRI compared to nvUS and not consistently correlated between both methods. Within the maximum of the carotid stenosis, RT-PC flow MRI showed implausible flow velocity reductions compared to nvUS. In contrast, the flow volumes determined by RT-PC flow MRI—with exception of the stenosis maximum—were comparable with nvUS and significantly correlated in the prestenotic common carotid artery.
Conclusion
RT-PC flow MRI does not appear to be suitable for quantifying blood flow velocities and volumes in the patients with carotid stenosis compared to nvUS. Apart from the lower temporal resolution of RT-PC MRI, the lack of correlation of blood flow velocities might be ascribed to the prevalence of nonlaminar flow within and behind the stenosis, which violates a general prerequisite for valid flow velocity measurements by PC MRI.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!