查明沙特阿拉伯急诊科工作流程中的主要瓶颈

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Abdulellah Al Thobaity
{"title":"查明沙特阿拉伯急诊科工作流程中的主要瓶颈","authors":"Abdulellah Al Thobaity","doi":"10.1155/jonm/4239274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Crowded emergency departments (EDs) adversely affect patient care and healthcare efficiency, leading to prolonged wait times, delayed treatments, and increased medical errors. This issue also diminishes patient satisfaction and disrupts hospital operations. In Saudi Arabia, ED overcrowding impacts response times and staff morale, highlighting the need for efficient patient flow processes to ensure timely and effective care.</p>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study is to identify the main bottlenecks in the workflow of Saudi Arabian EDs from patient arrival to disposition.</p>\n <p><b>Design:</b> A retrospective quantitative study analyzed data from 753 patients across multiple hospitals in Saudi Arabia’s EDs to identify workflow bottlenecks. Using SPSS and AMOS for data analysis, various statistical methods, including ANOVA and structural equation modeling (SEM), were employed to evaluate key performance metrics and their influence on the total length of stay (LOS).</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The Doctor to Decision Time is the most significant bottleneck, followed by the Triage to Doctor Time. CTAS3 and CTAS4 categories experience the most significant delays across multiple stages. In addition, the default model in AMOS 29 shows an excellent fit, indicating that reducing delays in Decision to Disposition Time (estimate = 0.840) and Doctor to Decision Time (estimate = 0.442) is crucial for improving the total LOS in the ED.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study identifies significant inefficiencies in the ED workflow in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the Doctor to Decision Time and Triage to Doctor Time stages, and recommends streamlining consultation protocols, enhancing medication delivery, expediting lab and radiology services, and increasing staffing to improve operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Faster bed turnover reduces Decision to Disposition Time and frees up ED beds. Adequate staffing improves triage, evaluation times, and care quality. Well-trained nurses enhance patient interactions and reduce delays. Standardized guidelines ensure timely treatment. Effective communication and teamwork improve patient flow and reduce bottlenecks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4239274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs)\",\"authors\":\"Abdulellah Al Thobaity\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jonm/4239274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Crowded emergency departments (EDs) adversely affect patient care and healthcare efficiency, leading to prolonged wait times, delayed treatments, and increased medical errors. This issue also diminishes patient satisfaction and disrupts hospital operations. In Saudi Arabia, ED overcrowding impacts response times and staff morale, highlighting the need for efficient patient flow processes to ensure timely and effective care.</p>\\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study is to identify the main bottlenecks in the workflow of Saudi Arabian EDs from patient arrival to disposition.</p>\\n <p><b>Design:</b> A retrospective quantitative study analyzed data from 753 patients across multiple hospitals in Saudi Arabia’s EDs to identify workflow bottlenecks. Using SPSS and AMOS for data analysis, various statistical methods, including ANOVA and structural equation modeling (SEM), were employed to evaluate key performance metrics and their influence on the total length of stay (LOS).</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> The Doctor to Decision Time is the most significant bottleneck, followed by the Triage to Doctor Time. CTAS3 and CTAS4 categories experience the most significant delays across multiple stages. In addition, the default model in AMOS 29 shows an excellent fit, indicating that reducing delays in Decision to Disposition Time (estimate = 0.840) and Doctor to Decision Time (estimate = 0.442) is crucial for improving the total LOS in the ED.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study identifies significant inefficiencies in the ED workflow in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the Doctor to Decision Time and Triage to Doctor Time stages, and recommends streamlining consultation protocols, enhancing medication delivery, expediting lab and radiology services, and increasing staffing to improve operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Faster bed turnover reduces Decision to Disposition Time and frees up ED beds. Adequate staffing improves triage, evaluation times, and care quality. Well-trained nurses enhance patient interactions and reduce delays. Standardized guidelines ensure timely treatment. Effective communication and teamwork improve patient flow and reduce bottlenecks.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/4239274\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4239274\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/4239274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拥挤的急诊科(EDs)对患者护理和医疗效率产生不利影响,导致等待时间延长、治疗延误和医疗差错增加。这个问题也降低了病人的满意度,扰乱了医院的运作。在沙特阿拉伯,急诊科过度拥挤影响了反应时间和工作人员的士气,强调需要有效的病人流程,以确保及时有效的护理。目的:本研究的目的是确定沙特阿拉伯急诊科从病人到达到处置的工作流程中的主要瓶颈。设计:一项回顾性定量研究分析了沙特阿拉伯多家医院急诊室753名患者的数据,以确定工作流程瓶颈。使用SPSS和AMOS进行数据分析,采用方差分析(ANOVA)和结构方程模型(SEM)等多种统计方法评估关键绩效指标及其对总停留时间(LOS)的影响。结果:医生到决策时间是最显著的瓶颈,其次是分诊到医生时间。CTAS3和CTAS4类别在多个阶段经历最显著的延迟。此外,AMOS 29中的默认模型具有很好的拟合性,表明减少Decision - to - Disposition Time(估计= 0.840)和Doctor - to - Decision Time(估计= 0.442)的延迟对于提高急诊科的总LOS至关重要。本研究确定了沙特阿拉伯急诊科工作流程的显著低效率,特别是在从医生到决策时间和从分诊到医生的时间阶段,并建议简化会诊方案,加强药物交付,加快实验室和放射服务,增加人员配置,以提高运营效率和患者治疗效果。更快的床位周转减少了从决策到处置的时间,并腾出了急诊床位。充足的人员配备可以改善分诊、评估时间和护理质量。训练有素的护士加强与病人的互动,减少延误。标准化的指导方针确保及时治疗。有效的沟通和团队合作改善了患者流程,减少了瓶颈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs)

Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs)

Background: Crowded emergency departments (EDs) adversely affect patient care and healthcare efficiency, leading to prolonged wait times, delayed treatments, and increased medical errors. This issue also diminishes patient satisfaction and disrupts hospital operations. In Saudi Arabia, ED overcrowding impacts response times and staff morale, highlighting the need for efficient patient flow processes to ensure timely and effective care.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the main bottlenecks in the workflow of Saudi Arabian EDs from patient arrival to disposition.

Design: A retrospective quantitative study analyzed data from 753 patients across multiple hospitals in Saudi Arabia’s EDs to identify workflow bottlenecks. Using SPSS and AMOS for data analysis, various statistical methods, including ANOVA and structural equation modeling (SEM), were employed to evaluate key performance metrics and their influence on the total length of stay (LOS).

Results: The Doctor to Decision Time is the most significant bottleneck, followed by the Triage to Doctor Time. CTAS3 and CTAS4 categories experience the most significant delays across multiple stages. In addition, the default model in AMOS 29 shows an excellent fit, indicating that reducing delays in Decision to Disposition Time (estimate = 0.840) and Doctor to Decision Time (estimate = 0.442) is crucial for improving the total LOS in the ED.

Conclusion: This study identifies significant inefficiencies in the ED workflow in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the Doctor to Decision Time and Triage to Doctor Time stages, and recommends streamlining consultation protocols, enhancing medication delivery, expediting lab and radiology services, and increasing staffing to improve operational efficiency and patient outcomes. Faster bed turnover reduces Decision to Disposition Time and frees up ED beds. Adequate staffing improves triage, evaluation times, and care quality. Well-trained nurses enhance patient interactions and reduce delays. Standardized guidelines ensure timely treatment. Effective communication and teamwork improve patient flow and reduce bottlenecks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信