考虑碳配额交易和政府补贴的BaaS商业模式下动力电池供应链定价决策

IF 4.4 2区工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS

Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2025.101679

Yuyan He , Xiaoqing Tan , Zhenting Hong , Fengjun Wang , Longcheng Huang

{"title":"考虑碳配额交易和政府补贴的BaaS商业模式下动力电池供应链定价决策","authors":"Yuyan He , Xiaoqing Tan , Zhenting Hong , Fengjun Wang , Longcheng Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilized the Battery as a Service (BaaS) framework to construct pricing decision models for battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading, government subsidies, and a hybrid policy. Optimal strategies for supply chain entities were determined through comparative analysis, assessing the impact of carbon trading prices, incentives for battery recycling, and gradient utilization efficiency on pricing and profitability. Results show that government subsidies to battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading increased vehicle body prices, hindering the reduction of new energy vehicle purchase costs for consumers. The introduction of carbon quota trading under government subsidies significantly enhanced the subsidy's profitability impact on the supply chain. The effects of carbon trading prices and subsidies on supply chain profits are uncertain, yet gradient utilization benefits overall supply chain profit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing decision in the power battery supply chain under BaaS business model considering carbon quota trading and government subsidies\",\"authors\":\"Yuyan He , Xiaoqing Tan , Zhenting Hong , Fengjun Wang , Longcheng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study utilized the Battery as a Service (BaaS) framework to construct pricing decision models for battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading, government subsidies, and a hybrid policy. Optimal strategies for supply chain entities were determined through comparative analysis, assessing the impact of carbon trading prices, incentives for battery recycling, and gradient utilization efficiency on pricing and profitability. Results show that government subsidies to battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading increased vehicle body prices, hindering the reduction of new energy vehicle purchase costs for consumers. The introduction of carbon quota trading under government subsidies significantly enhanced the subsidy's profitability impact on the supply chain. The effects of carbon trading prices and subsidies on supply chain profits are uncertain, yet gradient utilization benefits overall supply chain profit.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000298\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用电池即服务（BaaS）框架，构建碳配额交易、政府补贴和混合政策下电池制造商的定价决策模型。通过比较分析，评估了碳交易价格、电池回收激励和梯度利用效率对定价和盈利能力的影响，确定了供应链实体的最优策略。结果表明，碳配额交易下政府对电池厂商的补贴提高了车体价格，阻碍了消费者购买新能源汽车成本的降低。政府补贴下碳配额交易的引入显著增强了补贴对供应链盈利能力的影响。碳交易价格和补贴对供应链利润的影响是不确定的，但梯度利用有利于供应链整体利润。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pricing decision in the power battery supply chain under BaaS business model considering carbon quota trading and government subsidies

This study utilized the Battery as a Service (BaaS) framework to construct pricing decision models for battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading, government subsidies, and a hybrid policy. Optimal strategies for supply chain entities were determined through comparative analysis, assessing the impact of carbon trading prices, incentives for battery recycling, and gradient utilization efficiency on pricing and profitability. Results show that government subsidies to battery manufacturers under carbon quota trading increased vehicle body prices, hindering the reduction of new energy vehicle purchase costs for consumers. The introduction of carbon quota trading under government subsidies significantly enhanced the subsidy's profitability impact on the supply chain. The effects of carbon trading prices and subsidies on supply chain profits are uncertain, yet gradient utilization benefits overall supply chain profit.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS

CiteScore

8.10

自引率

9.10%

发文量

187

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.